Active Users:505 Time:17/10/2025 06:40:42 AM
I disagree... Etzel Send a noteboard - 15/11/2009 09:57:23 AM
This lends no weight to any of the 'major' suspects in my opinion. Only that minor suspects are less likely (and frankly, I consider Slayer a minor suspect, so if anything it takes away from that theory)


The answer it clear that the killer certainly wasn't the most popular choice, Graendal.

But of course you still have the opportunity to ask BS, whom he suspected as killer, when he was just a random WoT fan.. ;)
Reply to message
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory - 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM 1322 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM 765 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books... - 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM 889 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal - 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM 875 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM 718 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes. - 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM 682 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM 693 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny. - 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM 612 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it - 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM 569 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either. - 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM 596 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo... - 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM 742 Views
I'm sure you can see... - 20/11/2009 03:25:41 PM 760 Views
Well... - 20/11/2009 05:23:28 PM 598 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much. - 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM 667 Views
That's wrong - 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM 781 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong. - 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM 749 Views
right here - 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM 657 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM* - 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM 282 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM* - 15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM 265 Views
- 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM 726 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM 870 Views
Just once it would be nice to get a blow from Graendal. *NM* - 14/11/2009 03:50:41 PM 265 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 14/11/2009 04:46:33 PM 256 Views
Nope, that's not a blow against it at all - 14/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 582 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws... - 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM 672 Views
Agreed *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:55:44 AM 261 Views
I disagree... - 15/11/2009 09:57:23 AM 700 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson. - 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM 740 Views
Personally... - 15/11/2009 12:11:50 AM 729 Views
I think... - 15/11/2009 09:55:42 AM 594 Views
No. Try again. - 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM 738 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory - 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM 663 Views
Nonsense... - 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM 627 Views
Your tenacity is impressive. - 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM 687 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM 616 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM 557 Views
It's also possible that Lanfear gave Slayer the task. *NM* - 15/11/2009 07:55:17 PM 846 Views
Pa'ah did it. *NM* - 18/11/2009 01:02:09 AM 275 Views
It is not gone, I have a copy of it *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:19:11 PM 258 Views
I agree with Etzel. - 20/11/2009 02:59:44 AM 601 Views

Reply to Message