Active Users:514 Time:17/10/2025 06:34:02 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions... Sidious Send a noteboard - 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM
However, there is no way that BS wouldn't have figured that it might be Graendal. He isn't an idiot. On the other hand, it's not that easy to find all the clues from the books before LoC to determine that Slayer was the killer.

Therefore Graendal is pretty much ruled out. As I often pointed out, the theory anyway didn't make much sense, once you really think Asmo's murder through.

That last bit would be more convincing if you offered anything resembling an argument in support of it. And as for Graendal being ruled out, no, she's really not. All this does is ruling out the more unlikely suspects. Slayer, Graendal, Lanfear, perhaps even Taim all have enough support and adherents that "oh, those guys were right" makes sense as a reaction.


Sometimes make fun, because it makes them more lively.. ;)

However, I often pointed out the the pro-arguments for Slayerdunnit and the contra-arguments for Graendal. I actually posted a theory on the WoTmania Theory Post, where I compared Slayer vs. Graendal and came to the conclusion that the killer was most likely Slayer. Alas, the TP is gone.


My favourite part about your theory is that you believe that it was Graendal who hired Slayer. So you use all the evidence for Graendal to support Slayer. And of course Slayer likes to kill people, but then so does everyone who works for the Shadow. Lol.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory Etzel - 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM 1321 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. Tom - 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM 764 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books... ursidae - 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM 889 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal Jim - 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM 875 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV Etzel - 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM 718 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes. TaskmasterJack - 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM 681 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV Etzel - 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM 693 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny. Tom - 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM 612 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it Etzel - 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM 568 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either. Tom - 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM 594 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo... Etzel - 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM 742 Views
I'm sure you can see... Legolas - 20/11/2009 03:25:41 PM 758 Views
Well... Etzel - 20/11/2009 05:23:28 PM 596 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much. Tom - 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM 665 Views
That's wrong Etzel - 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM 780 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong. Tom - 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM 747 Views
right here Jim - 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM 657 Views
If Graendal's name is mentioned, then "Graendal" is in the book. *NM* Tom - 15/11/2009 12:13:57 PM 298 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM* Etzel - 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM 282 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM* Tom - 15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM 265 Views
Etzel - 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM 726 Views
BS never would have figured it out himself that Graendal did it? *NM* Etzel - 14/11/2009 05:20:19 PM 286 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. BlackAdder - 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM 870 Views
Just once it would be nice to get a blow from Graendal. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 14/11/2009 03:50:41 PM 265 Views
Agreed. *NM* Etzel - 14/11/2009 04:46:33 PM 256 Views
Nope, that's not a blow against it at all beetnemesis - 14/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 582 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws... kcf - 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM 671 Views
Agreed *NM* Sidious - 15/11/2009 06:55:44 AM 261 Views
I disagree... Etzel - 15/11/2009 09:57:23 AM 698 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson. lord-of-shadow - 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM 738 Views
Personally... Legolas - 15/11/2009 12:11:50 AM 728 Views
I think... Etzel - 15/11/2009 09:55:42 AM 594 Views
No. Try again. everynametaken - 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM 738 Views
Ok, I will stay alert for further blows to Graendaldunnit, if this didn't already convince you! *NM* Etzel - 15/11/2009 10:02:26 AM 263 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory Sidious - 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM 663 Views
Nonsense... Etzel - 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM 626 Views
Your tenacity is impressive. Legolas - 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM 685 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions... Etzel - 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM 616 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions... Sidious - 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM 557 Views
It's also possible that Lanfear gave Slayer the task. *NM* Etzel - 15/11/2009 07:55:17 PM 845 Views
Pa'ah did it. *NM* Mjolner - 18/11/2009 01:02:09 AM 275 Views
It is not gone, I have a copy of it *NM* Ryan - 15/11/2009 06:19:11 PM 258 Views
I agree with Etzel. Skeeve the Great - 20/11/2009 02:59:44 AM 599 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes