Active Users:831 Time:07/08/2025 04:48:51 AM
AS exist for you to question the purpose of all self-serving organizations making grand claims redhand Send a noteboard - 17/11/2009 09:31:24 AM
Can you, or should you trust a powerful organization answerable to no one but itself? Can an organization like that do more than incidential good for outsiders, more than what its members can do individually without the organization?

As has been pointed out, the only good were done by individual Sisters, without the need of a White Tower.

It is telling that the purposes each Ajah has are just mostly empty promises, escepially the Green, and the Yellow. For the Red, does it need to be the biggest Ajah to do its job?

So you kind of get it when you start to question their existance. The AS are written not as an example of ideals, but as something we should avoid. Of course the AS fail very hard, they are what you don't want to be.

Kingdoms and Empires are answerable only to itself, the rulers. And we no longer organize a country that way. We found better ways to do so. There are better ways to organize channelers than making them the current Aes Sedai.
Reply to message
Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 05:18:52 AM 1364 Views
They are politicians at heart... - 17/11/2009 05:31:41 AM 933 Views
You remember Moiraine, right? And Cadsuane? *NM* - 17/11/2009 05:32:50 AM 463 Views
That's individual AS, not AS as a group. *NM* - 17/11/2009 06:23:52 AM 331 Views
Short answer: nope. - 17/11/2009 05:51:01 AM 880 Views
Wonderful response, and I agree. - 17/11/2009 08:18:30 PM 703 Views
rather.. - 18/11/2009 08:32:10 AM 820 Views
Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 05:04:58 PM 726 Views
Re: Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 09:16:04 PM 716 Views
Their Tower allegience was always superior to their Empire allegience but was Bonwhine - 23/11/2009 02:29:57 AM 649 Views
But then.. - 23/11/2009 08:30:37 AM 751 Views
Kind of Sort of - 17/11/2009 07:05:51 AM 696 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 07:50:48 AM 649 Views
AS exist for you to question the purpose of all self-serving organizations making grand claims - 17/11/2009 09:31:24 AM 2089 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 02:36:33 PM 718 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 01:48:27 PM 642 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 09:14:14 PM 896 Views
You're asking the wrong question - 17/11/2009 05:35:06 PM 706 Views
You could ask the exact same questions about the Ashaman, or the Aiel, or the SeaFolk, or any group - 18/11/2009 11:49:25 AM 672 Views
SeaFolk yes, Aiel or Ashamen no.....stupid reply.....try again if you would like. *NM* - 18/11/2009 05:56:54 PM 406 Views
Scored using your words - 18/11/2009 06:33:31 PM 807 Views
Slow down Professor.....the AS have killed 1 Forsaken..... - 18/11/2009 10:59:39 PM 657 Views
I think he's counting Nynaeve and Egwene *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:21:20 PM 323 Views
So who killed Lanfear? *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:59:27 PM 424 Views
You mean Lanfear/Cyndane.....nobody..... - 19/11/2009 12:04:10 AM 683 Views
They reduced her in power. - 19/11/2009 12:39:17 AM 608 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 01:33:56 AM 636 Views
So you've decided to redefine words now? - 19/11/2009 01:42:48 AM 585 Views
Have you read the books? - 19/11/2009 01:39:37 AM 626 Views
I will type more slowly.....the AS have killed 1 and only 1 Forsaken..... - 19/11/2009 04:00:59 AM 632 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 05:00:13 AM 671 Views
Oh dear! - 19/11/2009 11:51:17 AM 595 Views
Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:04:44 PM 562 Views
Re: Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:11:36 PM 761 Views
This is silly - 19/11/2009 07:29:33 PM 601 Views
There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:45:18 PM 616 Views
The point I made is - 19/11/2009 07:48:52 PM 601 Views
Are we speaking english? - 19/11/2009 08:07:45 PM 814 Views
Not really - 19/11/2009 08:19:49 PM 685 Views
Re: There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:49:29 PM 738 Views
OK - 19/11/2009 08:15:08 PM 677 Views
No idea - 19/11/2009 08:17:09 PM 647 Views
OK fair enough, I do too, - 19/11/2009 08:31:11 PM 775 Views
Well what do you think of - 19/11/2009 08:56:38 PM 882 Views
And another point - 19/11/2009 03:05:45 PM 577 Views
For the sake of argument, though - 19/11/2009 03:49:23 PM 648 Views
OK fair enough - 19/11/2009 07:56:00 PM 632 Views
- 19/11/2009 12:06:02 AM 747 Views
There isn't much in this series I would call "filler" - seriously? - 19/11/2009 12:11:14 AM 597 Views
You're bothering to discuss a series with three books of "filler"- seriously? *NM* - 19/11/2009 01:34:43 AM 298 Views
Just skipped over them.....no big deal slick..... - 19/11/2009 04:02:57 AM 622 Views
Yeah right... - 19/11/2009 04:58:54 AM 581 Views
Yes, seriously - 20/11/2009 01:11:18 AM 681 Views

Reply to Message