Active Users:366 Time:01/05/2025 12:30:20 PM
AS exist for you to question the purpose of all self-serving organizations making grand claims redhand Send a noteboard - 17/11/2009 09:31:24 AM
Can you, or should you trust a powerful organization answerable to no one but itself? Can an organization like that do more than incidential good for outsiders, more than what its members can do individually without the organization?

As has been pointed out, the only good were done by individual Sisters, without the need of a White Tower.

It is telling that the purposes each Ajah has are just mostly empty promises, escepially the Green, and the Yellow. For the Red, does it need to be the biggest Ajah to do its job?

So you kind of get it when you start to question their existance. The AS are written not as an example of ideals, but as something we should avoid. Of course the AS fail very hard, they are what you don't want to be.

Kingdoms and Empires are answerable only to itself, the rulers. And we no longer organize a country that way. We found better ways to do so. There are better ways to organize channelers than making them the current Aes Sedai.
Reply to message
Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 05:18:52 AM 1334 Views
They are politicians at heart... - 17/11/2009 05:31:41 AM 898 Views
You remember Moiraine, right? And Cadsuane? *NM* - 17/11/2009 05:32:50 AM 450 Views
That's individual AS, not AS as a group. *NM* - 17/11/2009 06:23:52 AM 317 Views
Short answer: nope. - 17/11/2009 05:51:01 AM 843 Views
Wonderful response, and I agree. - 17/11/2009 08:18:30 PM 665 Views
rather.. - 18/11/2009 08:32:10 AM 785 Views
Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 05:04:58 PM 695 Views
Re: Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 09:16:04 PM 682 Views
Their Tower allegience was always superior to their Empire allegience but was Bonwhine - 23/11/2009 02:29:57 AM 604 Views
But then.. - 23/11/2009 08:30:37 AM 720 Views
Kind of Sort of - 17/11/2009 07:05:51 AM 657 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 07:50:48 AM 617 Views
AS exist for you to question the purpose of all self-serving organizations making grand claims - 17/11/2009 09:31:24 AM 2055 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 02:36:33 PM 685 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 01:48:27 PM 605 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 09:14:14 PM 839 Views
You're asking the wrong question - 17/11/2009 05:35:06 PM 672 Views
You could ask the exact same questions about the Ashaman, or the Aiel, or the SeaFolk, or any group - 18/11/2009 11:49:25 AM 634 Views
SeaFolk yes, Aiel or Ashamen no.....stupid reply.....try again if you would like. *NM* - 18/11/2009 05:56:54 PM 391 Views
Scored using your words - 18/11/2009 06:33:31 PM 767 Views
Slow down Professor.....the AS have killed 1 Forsaken..... - 18/11/2009 10:59:39 PM 617 Views
I think he's counting Nynaeve and Egwene *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:21:20 PM 310 Views
So who killed Lanfear? *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:59:27 PM 378 Views
You mean Lanfear/Cyndane.....nobody..... - 19/11/2009 12:04:10 AM 653 Views
They reduced her in power. - 19/11/2009 12:39:17 AM 576 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 01:33:56 AM 603 Views
So you've decided to redefine words now? - 19/11/2009 01:42:48 AM 550 Views
Have you read the books? - 19/11/2009 01:39:37 AM 595 Views
I will type more slowly.....the AS have killed 1 and only 1 Forsaken..... - 19/11/2009 04:00:59 AM 597 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 05:00:13 AM 633 Views
Oh dear! - 19/11/2009 11:51:17 AM 563 Views
Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:04:44 PM 525 Views
Re: Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:11:36 PM 721 Views
This is silly - 19/11/2009 07:29:33 PM 568 Views
There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:45:18 PM 582 Views
The point I made is - 19/11/2009 07:48:52 PM 566 Views
Are we speaking english? - 19/11/2009 08:07:45 PM 773 Views
Not really - 19/11/2009 08:19:49 PM 652 Views
Re: There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:49:29 PM 704 Views
OK - 19/11/2009 08:15:08 PM 638 Views
No idea - 19/11/2009 08:17:09 PM 613 Views
OK fair enough, I do too, - 19/11/2009 08:31:11 PM 738 Views
Well what do you think of - 19/11/2009 08:56:38 PM 847 Views
And another point - 19/11/2009 03:05:45 PM 543 Views
For the sake of argument, though - 19/11/2009 03:49:23 PM 609 Views
OK fair enough - 19/11/2009 07:56:00 PM 594 Views
- 19/11/2009 12:06:02 AM 714 Views
There isn't much in this series I would call "filler" - seriously? - 19/11/2009 12:11:14 AM 564 Views
You're bothering to discuss a series with three books of "filler"- seriously? *NM* - 19/11/2009 01:34:43 AM 284 Views
Just skipped over them.....no big deal slick..... - 19/11/2009 04:02:57 AM 585 Views
Yeah right... - 19/11/2009 04:58:54 AM 541 Views
Yes, seriously - 20/11/2009 01:11:18 AM 648 Views

Reply to Message