Active Users:1637 Time:21/10/2025 12:36:54 AM
AS exist for you to question the purpose of all self-serving organizations making grand claims redhand Send a noteboard - 17/11/2009 09:31:24 AM
Can you, or should you trust a powerful organization answerable to no one but itself? Can an organization like that do more than incidential good for outsiders, more than what its members can do individually without the organization?

As has been pointed out, the only good were done by individual Sisters, without the need of a White Tower.

It is telling that the purposes each Ajah has are just mostly empty promises, escepially the Green, and the Yellow. For the Red, does it need to be the biggest Ajah to do its job?

So you kind of get it when you start to question their existance. The AS are written not as an example of ideals, but as something we should avoid. Of course the AS fail very hard, they are what you don't want to be.

Kingdoms and Empires are answerable only to itself, the rulers. And we no longer organize a country that way. We found better ways to do so. There are better ways to organize channelers than making them the current Aes Sedai.
Reply to message
Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 05:18:52 AM 1388 Views
They are politicians at heart... - 17/11/2009 05:31:41 AM 970 Views
You remember Moiraine, right? And Cadsuane? *NM* - 17/11/2009 05:32:50 AM 477 Views
That's individual AS, not AS as a group. *NM* - 17/11/2009 06:23:52 AM 348 Views
Short answer: nope. - 17/11/2009 05:51:01 AM 913 Views
Wonderful response, and I agree. - 17/11/2009 08:18:30 PM 737 Views
rather.. - 18/11/2009 08:32:10 AM 847 Views
Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 05:04:58 PM 760 Views
Re: Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 09:16:04 PM 743 Views
Their Tower allegience was always superior to their Empire allegience but was Bonwhine - 23/11/2009 02:29:57 AM 683 Views
But then.. - 23/11/2009 08:30:37 AM 786 Views
Kind of Sort of - 17/11/2009 07:05:51 AM 732 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 07:50:48 AM 683 Views
AS exist for you to question the purpose of all self-serving organizations making grand claims - 17/11/2009 09:31:24 AM 2123 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 02:36:33 PM 752 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 01:48:27 PM 669 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 09:14:14 PM 922 Views
You're asking the wrong question - 17/11/2009 05:35:06 PM 737 Views
You could ask the exact same questions about the Ashaman, or the Aiel, or the SeaFolk, or any group - 18/11/2009 11:49:25 AM 712 Views
SeaFolk yes, Aiel or Ashamen no.....stupid reply.....try again if you would like. *NM* - 18/11/2009 05:56:54 PM 419 Views
Scored using your words - 18/11/2009 06:33:31 PM 837 Views
Slow down Professor.....the AS have killed 1 Forsaken..... - 18/11/2009 10:59:39 PM 682 Views
I think he's counting Nynaeve and Egwene *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:21:20 PM 336 Views
So who killed Lanfear? *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:59:27 PM 456 Views
You mean Lanfear/Cyndane.....nobody..... - 19/11/2009 12:04:10 AM 713 Views
They reduced her in power. - 19/11/2009 12:39:17 AM 641 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 01:33:56 AM 664 Views
So you've decided to redefine words now? - 19/11/2009 01:42:48 AM 613 Views
Have you read the books? - 19/11/2009 01:39:37 AM 661 Views
I will type more slowly.....the AS have killed 1 and only 1 Forsaken..... - 19/11/2009 04:00:59 AM 661 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 05:00:13 AM 707 Views
Oh dear! - 19/11/2009 11:51:17 AM 621 Views
Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:04:44 PM 587 Views
Re: Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:11:36 PM 787 Views
This is silly - 19/11/2009 07:29:33 PM 629 Views
There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:45:18 PM 651 Views
The point I made is - 19/11/2009 07:48:52 PM 638 Views
Are we speaking english? - 19/11/2009 08:07:45 PM 848 Views
Not really - 19/11/2009 08:19:49 PM 717 Views
Re: There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:49:29 PM 762 Views
OK - 19/11/2009 08:15:08 PM 708 Views
No idea - 19/11/2009 08:17:09 PM 679 Views
OK fair enough, I do too, - 19/11/2009 08:31:11 PM 816 Views
Well what do you think of - 19/11/2009 08:56:38 PM 913 Views
And another point - 19/11/2009 03:05:45 PM 606 Views
For the sake of argument, though - 19/11/2009 03:49:23 PM 677 Views
OK fair enough - 19/11/2009 07:56:00 PM 662 Views
- 19/11/2009 12:06:02 AM 775 Views
There isn't much in this series I would call "filler" - seriously? - 19/11/2009 12:11:14 AM 623 Views
You're bothering to discuss a series with three books of "filler"- seriously? *NM* - 19/11/2009 01:34:43 AM 312 Views
Just skipped over them.....no big deal slick..... - 19/11/2009 04:02:57 AM 650 Views
Yeah right... - 19/11/2009 04:58:54 AM 608 Views
Yes, seriously - 20/11/2009 01:11:18 AM 708 Views

Reply to Message