Active Users:471 Time:18/06/2025 09:17:41 AM
You're asking the wrong question HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 17/11/2009 05:35:06 PM
..or at least looking at it in the wrong direction. Instead of looking at what has been done and asking "are they relevent," look at what tehy should have and would have done, if they had not been infiltrated and subverted by the shadow. Suan and Moirane had a plan and it was working. They were moving subtly and had just about everything in position when the Black Ajah rose up and shattered their plans, and the Tower. Everything that happened after that was not the WT at work but BA manipulations.

There is a parallel to the Children of the light as well, though it is not explored as deeply in the books. It was not an accident that both the organizations that *should* have been major forces for the light were made inefectual at the same time.
Reply to message
Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 05:18:52 AM 1351 Views
They are politicians at heart... - 17/11/2009 05:31:41 AM 918 Views
You remember Moiraine, right? And Cadsuane? *NM* - 17/11/2009 05:32:50 AM 457 Views
That's individual AS, not AS as a group. *NM* - 17/11/2009 06:23:52 AM 325 Views
Short answer: nope. - 17/11/2009 05:51:01 AM 867 Views
Wonderful response, and I agree. - 17/11/2009 08:18:30 PM 693 Views
rather.. - 18/11/2009 08:32:10 AM 808 Views
Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 05:04:58 PM 717 Views
Re: Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 09:16:04 PM 703 Views
Their Tower allegience was always superior to their Empire allegience but was Bonwhine - 23/11/2009 02:29:57 AM 633 Views
But then.. - 23/11/2009 08:30:37 AM 740 Views
Kind of Sort of - 17/11/2009 07:05:51 AM 684 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 07:50:48 AM 638 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 02:36:33 PM 706 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 01:48:27 PM 628 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 09:14:14 PM 881 Views
You're asking the wrong question - 17/11/2009 05:35:06 PM 696 Views
You could ask the exact same questions about the Ashaman, or the Aiel, or the SeaFolk, or any group - 18/11/2009 11:49:25 AM 658 Views
SeaFolk yes, Aiel or Ashamen no.....stupid reply.....try again if you would like. *NM* - 18/11/2009 05:56:54 PM 399 Views
Scored using your words - 18/11/2009 06:33:31 PM 795 Views
Slow down Professor.....the AS have killed 1 Forsaken..... - 18/11/2009 10:59:39 PM 644 Views
I think he's counting Nynaeve and Egwene *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:21:20 PM 318 Views
So who killed Lanfear? *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:59:27 PM 412 Views
You mean Lanfear/Cyndane.....nobody..... - 19/11/2009 12:04:10 AM 672 Views
They reduced her in power. - 19/11/2009 12:39:17 AM 595 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 01:33:56 AM 623 Views
So you've decided to redefine words now? - 19/11/2009 01:42:48 AM 572 Views
Have you read the books? - 19/11/2009 01:39:37 AM 613 Views
I will type more slowly.....the AS have killed 1 and only 1 Forsaken..... - 19/11/2009 04:00:59 AM 622 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 05:00:13 AM 656 Views
Oh dear! - 19/11/2009 11:51:17 AM 583 Views
Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:04:44 PM 548 Views
Re: Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:11:36 PM 743 Views
This is silly - 19/11/2009 07:29:33 PM 589 Views
There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:45:18 PM 605 Views
The point I made is - 19/11/2009 07:48:52 PM 589 Views
Are we speaking english? - 19/11/2009 08:07:45 PM 799 Views
Not really - 19/11/2009 08:19:49 PM 676 Views
Re: There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:49:29 PM 726 Views
OK - 19/11/2009 08:15:08 PM 661 Views
No idea - 19/11/2009 08:17:09 PM 632 Views
OK fair enough, I do too, - 19/11/2009 08:31:11 PM 763 Views
Well what do you think of - 19/11/2009 08:56:38 PM 870 Views
And another point - 19/11/2009 03:05:45 PM 564 Views
For the sake of argument, though - 19/11/2009 03:49:23 PM 635 Views
OK fair enough - 19/11/2009 07:56:00 PM 615 Views
- 19/11/2009 12:06:02 AM 736 Views
There isn't much in this series I would call "filler" - seriously? - 19/11/2009 12:11:14 AM 584 Views
You're bothering to discuss a series with three books of "filler"- seriously? *NM* - 19/11/2009 01:34:43 AM 292 Views
Just skipped over them.....no big deal slick..... - 19/11/2009 04:02:57 AM 606 Views
Yeah right... - 19/11/2009 04:58:54 AM 568 Views
Yes, seriously - 20/11/2009 01:11:18 AM 671 Views

Reply to Message