Active Users:1456 Time:23/09/2026 05:22:41 PM
You're asking the wrong question HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 17/11/2009 05:35:06 PM
..or at least looking at it in the wrong direction. Instead of looking at what has been done and asking "are they relevent," look at what tehy should have and would have done, if they had not been infiltrated and subverted by the shadow. Suan and Moirane had a plan and it was working. They were moving subtly and had just about everything in position when the Black Ajah rose up and shattered their plans, and the Tower. Everything that happened after that was not the WT at work but BA manipulations.

There is a parallel to the Children of the light as well, though it is not explored as deeply in the books. It was not an accident that both the organizations that *should* have been major forces for the light were made inefectual at the same time.
Reply to message
Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 05:18:52 AM 1545 Views
They are politicians at heart... - 17/11/2009 05:31:41 AM 1124 Views
You remember Moiraine, right? And Cadsuane? *NM* - 17/11/2009 05:32:50 AM 558 Views
That's individual AS, not AS as a group. *NM* - 17/11/2009 06:23:52 AM 425 Views
Short answer: nope. - 17/11/2009 05:51:01 AM 1101 Views
Wonderful response, and I agree. - 17/11/2009 08:18:30 PM 897 Views
rather.. - 18/11/2009 08:32:10 AM 1037 Views
Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 05:04:58 PM 937 Views
Re: Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 09:16:04 PM 909 Views
Their Tower allegience was always superior to their Empire allegience but was Bonwhine - 23/11/2009 02:29:57 AM 873 Views
But then.. - 23/11/2009 08:30:37 AM 939 Views
Kind of Sort of - 17/11/2009 07:05:51 AM 919 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 07:50:48 AM 847 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 02:36:33 PM 934 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 01:48:27 PM 842 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 09:14:14 PM 1083 Views
You're asking the wrong question - 17/11/2009 05:35:06 PM 887 Views
You could ask the exact same questions about the Ashaman, or the Aiel, or the SeaFolk, or any group - 18/11/2009 11:49:25 AM 884 Views
SeaFolk yes, Aiel or Ashamen no.....stupid reply.....try again if you would like. *NM* - 18/11/2009 05:56:54 PM 497 Views
Scored using your words - 18/11/2009 06:33:31 PM 992 Views
Slow down Professor.....the AS have killed 1 Forsaken..... - 18/11/2009 10:59:39 PM 870 Views
I think he's counting Nynaeve and Egwene *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:21:20 PM 411 Views
So who killed Lanfear? *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:59:27 PM 533 Views
You mean Lanfear/Cyndane.....nobody..... - 19/11/2009 12:04:10 AM 901 Views
They reduced her in power. - 19/11/2009 12:39:17 AM 826 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 01:33:56 AM 823 Views
So you've decided to redefine words now? - 19/11/2009 01:42:48 AM 797 Views
Have you read the books? - 19/11/2009 01:39:37 AM 834 Views
I will type more slowly.....the AS have killed 1 and only 1 Forsaken..... - 19/11/2009 04:00:59 AM 831 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 05:00:13 AM 900 Views
Oh dear! - 19/11/2009 11:51:17 AM 800 Views
Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:04:44 PM 759 Views
Re: Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:11:36 PM 954 Views
This is silly - 19/11/2009 07:29:33 PM 844 Views
There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:45:18 PM 798 Views
The point I made is - 19/11/2009 07:48:52 PM 788 Views
Are we speaking english? - 19/11/2009 08:07:45 PM 1044 Views
Not really - 19/11/2009 08:19:49 PM 891 Views
Re: There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:49:29 PM 914 Views
OK - 19/11/2009 08:15:08 PM 862 Views
No idea - 19/11/2009 08:17:09 PM 844 Views
OK fair enough, I do too, - 19/11/2009 08:31:11 PM 963 Views
Well what do you think of - 19/11/2009 08:56:38 PM 1060 Views
And another point - 19/11/2009 03:05:45 PM 761 Views
For the sake of argument, though - 19/11/2009 03:49:23 PM 844 Views
OK fair enough - 19/11/2009 07:56:00 PM 832 Views
- 19/11/2009 12:06:02 AM 961 Views
There isn't much in this series I would call "filler" - seriously? - 19/11/2009 12:11:14 AM 803 Views
You're bothering to discuss a series with three books of "filler"- seriously? *NM* - 19/11/2009 01:34:43 AM 397 Views
Just skipped over them.....no big deal slick..... - 19/11/2009 04:02:57 AM 832 Views
Yeah right... - 19/11/2009 04:58:54 AM 783 Views
Yes, seriously - 20/11/2009 01:11:18 AM 861 Views

Reply to Message