Active Users:2200 Time:18/06/2026 12:26:16 AM
You're asking the wrong question HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 17/11/2009 05:35:06 PM
..or at least looking at it in the wrong direction. Instead of looking at what has been done and asking "are they relevent," look at what tehy should have and would have done, if they had not been infiltrated and subverted by the shadow. Suan and Moirane had a plan and it was working. They were moving subtly and had just about everything in position when the Black Ajah rose up and shattered their plans, and the Tower. Everything that happened after that was not the WT at work but BA manipulations.

There is a parallel to the Children of the light as well, though it is not explored as deeply in the books. It was not an accident that both the organizations that *should* have been major forces for the light were made inefectual at the same time.
Reply to message
Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 05:18:52 AM 1494 Views
They are politicians at heart... - 17/11/2009 05:31:41 AM 1068 Views
You remember Moiraine, right? And Cadsuane? *NM* - 17/11/2009 05:32:50 AM 521 Views
That's individual AS, not AS as a group. *NM* - 17/11/2009 06:23:52 AM 397 Views
Short answer: nope. - 17/11/2009 05:51:01 AM 1034 Views
Wonderful response, and I agree. - 17/11/2009 08:18:30 PM 841 Views
rather.. - 18/11/2009 08:32:10 AM 954 Views
Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 05:04:58 PM 876 Views
Re: Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 09:16:04 PM 858 Views
Their Tower allegience was always superior to their Empire allegience but was Bonwhine - 23/11/2009 02:29:57 AM 811 Views
But then.. - 23/11/2009 08:30:37 AM 890 Views
Kind of Sort of - 17/11/2009 07:05:51 AM 847 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 07:50:48 AM 793 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 02:36:33 PM 874 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 01:48:27 PM 775 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 09:14:14 PM 1031 Views
You're asking the wrong question - 17/11/2009 05:35:06 PM 837 Views
You could ask the exact same questions about the Ashaman, or the Aiel, or the SeaFolk, or any group - 18/11/2009 11:49:25 AM 825 Views
SeaFolk yes, Aiel or Ashamen no.....stupid reply.....try again if you would like. *NM* - 18/11/2009 05:56:54 PM 467 Views
Scored using your words - 18/11/2009 06:33:31 PM 940 Views
Slow down Professor.....the AS have killed 1 Forsaken..... - 18/11/2009 10:59:39 PM 817 Views
I think he's counting Nynaeve and Egwene *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:21:20 PM 380 Views
So who killed Lanfear? *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:59:27 PM 507 Views
You mean Lanfear/Cyndane.....nobody..... - 19/11/2009 12:04:10 AM 841 Views
They reduced her in power. - 19/11/2009 12:39:17 AM 751 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 01:33:56 AM 762 Views
So you've decided to redefine words now? - 19/11/2009 01:42:48 AM 732 Views
Have you read the books? - 19/11/2009 01:39:37 AM 766 Views
I will type more slowly.....the AS have killed 1 and only 1 Forsaken..... - 19/11/2009 04:00:59 AM 764 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 05:00:13 AM 846 Views
Oh dear! - 19/11/2009 11:51:17 AM 733 Views
Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:04:44 PM 706 Views
Re: Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:11:36 PM 900 Views
This is silly - 19/11/2009 07:29:33 PM 769 Views
There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:45:18 PM 748 Views
The point I made is - 19/11/2009 07:48:52 PM 740 Views
Are we speaking english? - 19/11/2009 08:07:45 PM 961 Views
Not really - 19/11/2009 08:19:49 PM 814 Views
Re: There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:49:29 PM 869 Views
OK - 19/11/2009 08:15:08 PM 813 Views
No idea - 19/11/2009 08:17:09 PM 787 Views
OK fair enough, I do too, - 19/11/2009 08:31:11 PM 914 Views
Well what do you think of - 19/11/2009 08:56:38 PM 1013 Views
And another point - 19/11/2009 03:05:45 PM 711 Views
For the sake of argument, though - 19/11/2009 03:49:23 PM 785 Views
OK fair enough - 19/11/2009 07:56:00 PM 771 Views
- 19/11/2009 12:06:02 AM 884 Views
There isn't much in this series I would call "filler" - seriously? - 19/11/2009 12:11:14 AM 743 Views
You're bothering to discuss a series with three books of "filler"- seriously? *NM* - 19/11/2009 01:34:43 AM 360 Views
Just skipped over them.....no big deal slick..... - 19/11/2009 04:02:57 AM 769 Views
Yeah right... - 19/11/2009 04:58:54 AM 720 Views
Yes, seriously - 20/11/2009 01:11:18 AM 800 Views

Reply to Message