There is actually no evidence that Alivia is the strongest of all damane. It actually would be very surprising if of all damane, Rand's troops managed to capture the strongest of all Seanchan damane in PoD. Most likely some super strong damane are in the possession of the Imperial Family. It makes sense then that Tuon took at least one super strong damane with her for the campaign in the Westlands.
But maybe BS will clarify it in coming Q&A (maybe he would answer "Is Alivia the strongest damane out there or at least the strongest among those we have seen in the series?", or Sera will play a more important role in ToM and/or AMoL, which shows her true strength.
But maybe BS will clarify it in coming Q&A (maybe he would answer "Is Alivia the strongest damane out there or at least the strongest among those we have seen in the series?", or Sera will play a more important role in ToM and/or AMoL, which shows her true strength.
This message last edited by Etzel on 19/11/2009 at 04:42:05 PM
Female Forsaken strength : a new post
- 19/11/2009 04:12:35 PM
1910 Views
Except...
- 19/11/2009 04:26:32 PM
932 Views
There's no evidence for that
- 19/11/2009 04:31:17 PM
877 Views
I agree with Sidious - we have no evidence at this time, so she should remain off the list
- 19/11/2009 04:38:31 PM
887 Views
It's common sense
- 19/11/2009 04:40:01 PM
805 Views
No, it's based on absolutely nothing
- 19/11/2009 04:50:30 PM
931 Views
If you agree that there are stronger damane than Alivia...
- 19/11/2009 05:00:05 PM
807 Views
Glad to have you back. Now for the arguments to start!
- 19/11/2009 04:29:01 PM
963 Views
Hmm...
- 19/11/2009 04:47:12 PM
964 Views
Actually, you are the one placing Lanfear immensely high, my list reduced the strength difference...
- 19/11/2009 05:05:18 PM
1052 Views
But I'm not
- 19/11/2009 05:17:05 PM
928 Views
Let me ask you this...
- 19/11/2009 10:13:12 PM
970 Views
All assumption
- 20/11/2009 04:11:20 AM
861 Views
Why introduce that concept, if it is just of academic importance?
- 20/11/2009 07:41:54 AM
784 Views
You don't know the significance of it at all
- 20/11/2009 03:14:46 PM
927 Views
Why?
- 20/11/2009 03:17:51 PM
1445 Views
Re: Why?
- 20/11/2009 04:30:50 PM
818 Views
How can you argue in such a way and still keep a straight face (presumably)...
- 20/11/2009 05:07:39 PM
825 Views
Re: How can you argue in such a way and still keep a straight face (presumably)...
- 21/11/2009 10:55:47 AM
829 Views
Is Graendal the only Forsaken NOT to overstate her own ability then?
- 21/11/2009 01:53:28 PM
948 Views
Your rankings hinge ENTIRELY on whether you have Graendal correctly placed.
- 20/11/2009 03:24:22 PM
816 Views
Yeah... entirely
- 20/11/2009 04:33:45 PM
780 Views
- 20/11/2009 04:33:45 PM
780 Views
What ever happened to all teh info from wotmania? Especially the FAQs? *NM*
- 19/11/2009 05:01:45 PM
569 Views
Re: Female Forsaken strength : a new post
- 19/11/2009 05:39:10 PM
903 Views
Re: Female Forsaken strength : a new post -- What about Dexterity??
- 19/11/2009 06:44:31 PM
897 Views
Seems good, except I'd bunch up the upper levels and place Nynaeve a little higher. *NM*
- 19/11/2009 09:46:16 PM
463 Views
Too many levels
- 20/11/2009 01:48:24 AM
893 Views
21 levels is largely a myth
- 20/11/2009 04:27:27 AM
810 Views
I have to disagree for a couple of reasons.
- 20/11/2009 04:14:40 AM
930 Views
I thought of something else to support my upper limit theory on gateways
- 20/11/2009 01:53:05 PM
942 Views
Talaan is not stronger than Nynaeve
- 28/11/2009 08:27:22 PM
1024 Views
more hopefully to come
- 20/11/2009 08:15:00 PM
747 Views
Thanks KCF, that's a great question to ask.
- 20/11/2009 08:28:32 PM
999 Views
I'm the same way. I should be studying for law school finals, but I'm distracted. *NM*
- 20/11/2009 09:45:46 PM
380 Views
I agree that Graendal is the 2nd most powerful woman Forsaken
- 29/11/2009 04:07:00 PM
761 Views
