Active Users:351 Time:17/06/2025 02:31:10 PM
Well... Etzel Send a noteboard - 20/11/2009 05:23:28 PM
I would already be satisfied if the Graendadunnits admited that Slayer became more likely than Graendal, at least due to the events in TGS and BS' statements.

But probably you are right, and they will only buy it, if it's spelled out in the text.
Reply to message
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory - 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM 1269 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM 718 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books... - 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM 832 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal - 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM 823 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM 675 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes. - 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM 637 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM 647 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny. - 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM 563 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it - 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM 521 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either. - 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM 549 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo... - 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM 689 Views
I'm sure you can see... - 20/11/2009 03:25:41 PM 703 Views
Well... - 20/11/2009 05:23:28 PM 548 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much. - 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM 616 Views
That's wrong - 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM 733 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong. - 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM 686 Views
right here - 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM 611 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM* - 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM 264 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM* - 15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM 244 Views
- 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM 693 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM 825 Views
Just once it would be nice to get a blow from Graendal. *NM* - 14/11/2009 03:50:41 PM 245 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 14/11/2009 04:46:33 PM 235 Views
Nope, that's not a blow against it at all - 14/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 541 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws... - 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM 621 Views
Agreed *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:55:44 AM 240 Views
I disagree... - 15/11/2009 09:57:23 AM 649 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson. - 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM 681 Views
Personally... - 15/11/2009 12:11:50 AM 675 Views
I think... - 15/11/2009 09:55:42 AM 549 Views
No. Try again. - 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM 690 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory - 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM 612 Views
Nonsense... - 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM 582 Views
Your tenacity is impressive. - 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM 638 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM 571 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM 512 Views
It's also possible that Lanfear gave Slayer the task. *NM* - 15/11/2009 07:55:17 PM 799 Views
Pa'ah did it. *NM* - 18/11/2009 01:02:09 AM 249 Views
It is not gone, I have a copy of it *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:19:11 PM 239 Views
I agree with Etzel. - 20/11/2009 02:59:44 AM 555 Views

Reply to Message