Active Users:853 Time:03/05/2026 10:47:57 PM
Their Tower allegience was always superior to their Empire allegience but was Bonwhine Onarishma Send a noteboard - 23/11/2009 02:29:57 AM
Yes, Hawkwing included AS but he ran a meritocracy(Sp?). He didn't use them because they were AS but rather because they happened to be competent.

Also, It wasn't all Ishy that turned Hawkwing against the AS. The fact that the AS started to sabotage Hawkwing's rule by taking orders from Beonwhin(Sp?) rather than following the laws and guidelines from Hawking, whom as govenors they were to supposed to follow.


Before or after Hawkwing started being manipulated... It was my understanding that Ishy was around before Bonewhine started acting up and since Ishmael began the Black Ajah we could lay Bonewhine at his feet as well if she was their doing.
Reply to message
Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 05:18:52 AM 1475 Views
They are politicians at heart... - 17/11/2009 05:31:41 AM 1056 Views
You remember Moiraine, right? And Cadsuane? *NM* - 17/11/2009 05:32:50 AM 514 Views
That's individual AS, not AS as a group. *NM* - 17/11/2009 06:23:52 AM 389 Views
Short answer: nope. - 17/11/2009 05:51:01 AM 1011 Views
Wonderful response, and I agree. - 17/11/2009 08:18:30 PM 823 Views
rather.. - 18/11/2009 08:32:10 AM 933 Views
Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 05:04:58 PM 856 Views
Re: Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 09:16:04 PM 843 Views
Their Tower allegience was always superior to their Empire allegience but was Bonwhine - 23/11/2009 02:29:57 AM 788 Views
But then.. - 23/11/2009 08:30:37 AM 875 Views
Kind of Sort of - 17/11/2009 07:05:51 AM 824 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 07:50:48 AM 770 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 02:36:33 PM 856 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 01:48:27 PM 757 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 09:14:14 PM 1018 Views
You're asking the wrong question - 17/11/2009 05:35:06 PM 818 Views
You could ask the exact same questions about the Ashaman, or the Aiel, or the SeaFolk, or any group - 18/11/2009 11:49:25 AM 808 Views
SeaFolk yes, Aiel or Ashamen no.....stupid reply.....try again if you would like. *NM* - 18/11/2009 05:56:54 PM 458 Views
Scored using your words - 18/11/2009 06:33:31 PM 920 Views
Slow down Professor.....the AS have killed 1 Forsaken..... - 18/11/2009 10:59:39 PM 783 Views
I think he's counting Nynaeve and Egwene *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:21:20 PM 371 Views
So who killed Lanfear? *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:59:27 PM 497 Views
You mean Lanfear/Cyndane.....nobody..... - 19/11/2009 12:04:10 AM 829 Views
They reduced her in power. - 19/11/2009 12:39:17 AM 729 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 01:33:56 AM 749 Views
So you've decided to redefine words now? - 19/11/2009 01:42:48 AM 708 Views
Have you read the books? - 19/11/2009 01:39:37 AM 746 Views
I will type more slowly.....the AS have killed 1 and only 1 Forsaken..... - 19/11/2009 04:00:59 AM 744 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 05:00:13 AM 819 Views
Oh dear! - 19/11/2009 11:51:17 AM 707 Views
Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:04:44 PM 682 Views
Re: Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:11:36 PM 876 Views
This is silly - 19/11/2009 07:29:33 PM 736 Views
There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:45:18 PM 735 Views
The point I made is - 19/11/2009 07:48:52 PM 721 Views
Are we speaking english? - 19/11/2009 08:07:45 PM 938 Views
Not really - 19/11/2009 08:19:49 PM 794 Views
Re: There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:49:29 PM 847 Views
OK - 19/11/2009 08:15:08 PM 798 Views
No idea - 19/11/2009 08:17:09 PM 771 Views
OK fair enough, I do too, - 19/11/2009 08:31:11 PM 899 Views
Well what do you think of - 19/11/2009 08:56:38 PM 1000 Views
And another point - 19/11/2009 03:05:45 PM 692 Views
For the sake of argument, though - 19/11/2009 03:49:23 PM 765 Views
OK fair enough - 19/11/2009 07:56:00 PM 747 Views
- 19/11/2009 12:06:02 AM 859 Views
There isn't much in this series I would call "filler" - seriously? - 19/11/2009 12:11:14 AM 723 Views
You're bothering to discuss a series with three books of "filler"- seriously? *NM* - 19/11/2009 01:34:43 AM 350 Views
Just skipped over them.....no big deal slick..... - 19/11/2009 04:02:57 AM 744 Views
Yeah right... - 19/11/2009 04:58:54 AM 704 Views
Yes, seriously - 20/11/2009 01:11:18 AM 780 Views

Reply to Message