Active Users:1413 Time:23/09/2026 04:09:11 PM
Their Tower allegience was always superior to their Empire allegience but was Bonwhine Onarishma Send a noteboard - 23/11/2009 02:29:57 AM
Yes, Hawkwing included AS but he ran a meritocracy(Sp?). He didn't use them because they were AS but rather because they happened to be competent.

Also, It wasn't all Ishy that turned Hawkwing against the AS. The fact that the AS started to sabotage Hawkwing's rule by taking orders from Beonwhin(Sp?) rather than following the laws and guidelines from Hawking, whom as govenors they were to supposed to follow.


Before or after Hawkwing started being manipulated... It was my understanding that Ishy was around before Bonewhine started acting up and since Ishmael began the Black Ajah we could lay Bonewhine at his feet as well if she was their doing.
Reply to message
Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 05:18:52 AM 1543 Views
They are politicians at heart... - 17/11/2009 05:31:41 AM 1122 Views
You remember Moiraine, right? And Cadsuane? *NM* - 17/11/2009 05:32:50 AM 558 Views
That's individual AS, not AS as a group. *NM* - 17/11/2009 06:23:52 AM 425 Views
Short answer: nope. - 17/11/2009 05:51:01 AM 1099 Views
Wonderful response, and I agree. - 17/11/2009 08:18:30 PM 894 Views
rather.. - 18/11/2009 08:32:10 AM 1035 Views
Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 05:04:58 PM 934 Views
Re: Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 09:16:04 PM 909 Views
Their Tower allegience was always superior to their Empire allegience but was Bonwhine - 23/11/2009 02:29:57 AM 873 Views
But then.. - 23/11/2009 08:30:37 AM 937 Views
Kind of Sort of - 17/11/2009 07:05:51 AM 918 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 07:50:48 AM 846 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 02:36:33 PM 932 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 01:48:27 PM 840 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 09:14:14 PM 1081 Views
You're asking the wrong question - 17/11/2009 05:35:06 PM 884 Views
You could ask the exact same questions about the Ashaman, or the Aiel, or the SeaFolk, or any group - 18/11/2009 11:49:25 AM 882 Views
SeaFolk yes, Aiel or Ashamen no.....stupid reply.....try again if you would like. *NM* - 18/11/2009 05:56:54 PM 497 Views
Scored using your words - 18/11/2009 06:33:31 PM 990 Views
Slow down Professor.....the AS have killed 1 Forsaken..... - 18/11/2009 10:59:39 PM 868 Views
I think he's counting Nynaeve and Egwene *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:21:20 PM 411 Views
So who killed Lanfear? *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:59:27 PM 533 Views
You mean Lanfear/Cyndane.....nobody..... - 19/11/2009 12:04:10 AM 899 Views
They reduced her in power. - 19/11/2009 12:39:17 AM 824 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 01:33:56 AM 821 Views
So you've decided to redefine words now? - 19/11/2009 01:42:48 AM 795 Views
Have you read the books? - 19/11/2009 01:39:37 AM 832 Views
I will type more slowly.....the AS have killed 1 and only 1 Forsaken..... - 19/11/2009 04:00:59 AM 830 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 05:00:13 AM 898 Views
Oh dear! - 19/11/2009 11:51:17 AM 798 Views
Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:04:44 PM 757 Views
Re: Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:11:36 PM 952 Views
This is silly - 19/11/2009 07:29:33 PM 842 Views
There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:45:18 PM 796 Views
The point I made is - 19/11/2009 07:48:52 PM 786 Views
Are we speaking english? - 19/11/2009 08:07:45 PM 1042 Views
Not really - 19/11/2009 08:19:49 PM 891 Views
Re: There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:49:29 PM 912 Views
OK - 19/11/2009 08:15:08 PM 860 Views
No idea - 19/11/2009 08:17:09 PM 842 Views
OK fair enough, I do too, - 19/11/2009 08:31:11 PM 961 Views
Well what do you think of - 19/11/2009 08:56:38 PM 1058 Views
And another point - 19/11/2009 03:05:45 PM 759 Views
For the sake of argument, though - 19/11/2009 03:49:23 PM 842 Views
OK fair enough - 19/11/2009 07:56:00 PM 832 Views
- 19/11/2009 12:06:02 AM 959 Views
There isn't much in this series I would call "filler" - seriously? - 19/11/2009 12:11:14 AM 801 Views
You're bothering to discuss a series with three books of "filler"- seriously? *NM* - 19/11/2009 01:34:43 AM 397 Views
Just skipped over them.....no big deal slick..... - 19/11/2009 04:02:57 AM 830 Views
Yeah right... - 19/11/2009 04:58:54 AM 780 Views
Yes, seriously - 20/11/2009 01:11:18 AM 859 Views

Reply to Message