This really is a massive gap in the Oath. It's not really used in the books that way but it could be. A Sister could lie freely as long as she thought she was being sarcastic. How the person she is talking to takes it is secondary.
I mean, c'mon... here's a typical excange between a normal person and an AS (I believe there are at least two exchanges almost exactly like this in the series):
Q: "What is your name?"
A: "You may call me Alyce."
Not technically a lie, since the AS is not saying her name is Alyce, but the intent is clearly a lie.
The oaths are next to worthless. Especially since everyone in the Westlands seems to be aware that AS do this so no one ever believes them anyway.
This message last edited by BlackAdder on 07/12/2009 at 05:13:27 AM
Cadsuane lies!
- 06/12/2009 06:10:41 PM
2225 Views
Re: Cadsuane lies!
- 06/12/2009 06:18:39 PM
1432 Views
Sarcasm is one thing
- 06/12/2009 06:43:12 PM
1144 Views
I disagree
- 06/12/2009 06:51:27 PM
1096 Views
RJ has said they're allowed to be sarcastic
- 06/12/2009 07:07:32 PM
1054 Views
How does that jive with the Oaths?
- 06/12/2009 07:13:21 PM
1103 Views
Good point, but in that same book Tamra said that Gitara didn't say anything before dying *NM*
- 06/12/2009 07:53:31 PM
511 Views
Re: Good point, but in that same book Tamra said that Gitara didn't say anything before dying
- 06/12/2009 08:03:36 PM
1148 Views
The Oaths focus on INTENT
- 06/12/2009 10:01:27 PM
1080 Views
Because it isn't a lie
- 06/12/2009 07:44:29 PM
1081 Views
I understand this, I'm not arguing that an AS should not be able to be sarcastic
- 06/12/2009 08:08:15 PM
1062 Views
Re: I understand this, I'm not arguing that an AS should not be able to be sarcastic
- 06/12/2009 08:35:23 PM
1088 Views
Quote for you
- 06/12/2009 08:42:52 PM
1019 Views
The sarcasm was for him repeating himself to her. The "remember" is the part she's refering to.
- 07/12/2009 10:15:06 AM
855 Views
That's why I think this example of sarcasm works as opposed to Cadsuane who makes a false statement
- 07/12/2009 03:17:52 PM
928 Views
sarcasm is sarcasm. In both instances their is technically a lie.
- 07/12/2009 11:28:02 PM
875 Views
Not at all the case
- 07/12/2009 11:58:42 PM
960 Views
Do you really believe he waited till the last minute to tell Seonid?
- 14/12/2009 01:32:37 PM
1029 Views
What about the Sheriam thing?
- 07/12/2009 01:49:32 PM
950 Views
Re: What about the Sheriam thing?
- 07/12/2009 02:15:25 PM
822 Views
But surely an Aes Sedai can answer a question she hasn't fully heard yet.
- 07/12/2009 03:06:34 PM
1063 Views
Sarcasm
- 06/12/2009 07:14:47 PM
1097 Views
It's obviously meant to be sarcasm, I just don't like
- 06/12/2009 07:18:40 PM
898 Views
Here is what RJ said about it
- 06/12/2009 07:41:18 PM
1046 Views
Well I have to say I think RJ made the wrong call with this one *NM*
- 06/12/2009 07:43:47 PM
453 Views
Agreed.
- 07/12/2009 01:45:39 AM
864 Views
You can already drive a truck through the oaths. Does this one additional tiny gap really matter?
- 07/12/2009 04:07:16 AM
889 Views
Alys (Moiraine alias) *NM*
- 07/12/2009 05:13:18 AM
1197 Views
what do you think a RL lie detector would tell in this case?
- 07/12/2009 12:27:07 PM
832 Views
in RL you would get warned by the investigator to cooperate
- 07/12/2009 01:04:33 PM
862 Views
But how would the machine reading indicate?
- 07/12/2009 07:04:22 PM
863 Views
Usually you're s'possed to answer with a yes or no. It's easy to tell when you're evasive
- 09/12/2009 10:46:58 PM
902 Views
Where's the problem?
- 09/12/2009 04:18:40 PM
811 Views
It's in the way the Oath is worded
- 09/12/2009 05:14:39 PM
859 Views
PS You misread my original quote
- 09/12/2009 11:00:56 PM
797 Views
Lies, untruths, sarcasm, and meaning
- 09/12/2009 07:46:25 PM
932 Views
We are starting understand each other
- 09/12/2009 10:09:41 PM
904 Views


