This really is a massive gap in the Oath. It's not really used in the books that way but it could be. A Sister could lie freely as long as she thought she was being sarcastic. How the person she is talking to takes it is secondary.
I mean, c'mon... here's a typical excange between a normal person and an AS (I believe there are at least two exchanges almost exactly like this in the series):
Q: "What is your name?"
A: "You may call me Alyce."
Not technically a lie, since the AS is not saying her name is Alyce, but the intent is clearly a lie.
The oaths are next to worthless. Especially since everyone in the Westlands seems to be aware that AS do this so no one ever believes them anyway.
This message last edited by BlackAdder on 07/12/2009 at 05:13:27 AM
Cadsuane lies!
- 06/12/2009 06:10:41 PM
2426 Views
Re: Cadsuane lies!
- 06/12/2009 06:18:39 PM
1651 Views
Sarcasm is one thing
- 06/12/2009 06:43:12 PM
1330 Views
I disagree
- 06/12/2009 06:51:27 PM
1298 Views
RJ has said they're allowed to be sarcastic
- 06/12/2009 07:07:32 PM
1251 Views
How does that jive with the Oaths?
- 06/12/2009 07:13:21 PM
1307 Views
Good point, but in that same book Tamra said that Gitara didn't say anything before dying *NM*
- 06/12/2009 07:53:31 PM
612 Views
Re: Good point, but in that same book Tamra said that Gitara didn't say anything before dying
- 06/12/2009 08:03:36 PM
1379 Views
The Oaths focus on INTENT
- 06/12/2009 10:01:27 PM
1273 Views
Because it isn't a lie
- 06/12/2009 07:44:29 PM
1306 Views
I understand this, I'm not arguing that an AS should not be able to be sarcastic
- 06/12/2009 08:08:15 PM
1295 Views
Re: I understand this, I'm not arguing that an AS should not be able to be sarcastic
- 06/12/2009 08:35:23 PM
1325 Views
Quote for you
- 06/12/2009 08:42:52 PM
1242 Views
The sarcasm was for him repeating himself to her. The "remember" is the part she's refering to.
- 07/12/2009 10:15:06 AM
1092 Views
That's why I think this example of sarcasm works as opposed to Cadsuane who makes a false statement
- 07/12/2009 03:17:52 PM
1133 Views
sarcasm is sarcasm. In both instances their is technically a lie.
- 07/12/2009 11:28:02 PM
1086 Views
Not at all the case
- 07/12/2009 11:58:42 PM
1148 Views
Do you really believe he waited till the last minute to tell Seonid?
- 14/12/2009 01:32:37 PM
1253 Views
What about the Sheriam thing?
- 07/12/2009 01:49:32 PM
1186 Views
Re: What about the Sheriam thing?
- 07/12/2009 02:15:25 PM
1022 Views
But surely an Aes Sedai can answer a question she hasn't fully heard yet.
- 07/12/2009 03:06:34 PM
1280 Views
Sarcasm
- 06/12/2009 07:14:47 PM
1315 Views
It's obviously meant to be sarcasm, I just don't like
- 06/12/2009 07:18:40 PM
1100 Views
Here is what RJ said about it
- 06/12/2009 07:41:18 PM
1277 Views
Well I have to say I think RJ made the wrong call with this one *NM*
- 06/12/2009 07:43:47 PM
551 Views
Agreed.
- 07/12/2009 01:45:39 AM
1064 Views
You can already drive a truck through the oaths. Does this one additional tiny gap really matter?
- 07/12/2009 04:07:16 AM
1121 Views
Alys (Moiraine alias) *NM*
- 07/12/2009 05:13:18 AM
1421 Views
what do you think a RL lie detector would tell in this case?
- 07/12/2009 12:27:07 PM
1075 Views
in RL you would get warned by the investigator to cooperate
- 07/12/2009 01:04:33 PM
1091 Views
But how would the machine reading indicate?
- 07/12/2009 07:04:22 PM
1058 Views
Usually you're s'possed to answer with a yes or no. It's easy to tell when you're evasive
- 09/12/2009 10:46:58 PM
1146 Views
Where's the problem?
- 09/12/2009 04:18:40 PM
997 Views
It's in the way the Oath is worded
- 09/12/2009 05:14:39 PM
1085 Views
PS You misread my original quote
- 09/12/2009 11:00:56 PM
996 Views
Lies, untruths, sarcasm, and meaning
- 09/12/2009 07:46:25 PM
1180 Views
We are starting understand each other
- 09/12/2009 10:09:41 PM
1129 Views


