This really is a massive gap in the Oath. It's not really used in the books that way but it could be. A Sister could lie freely as long as she thought she was being sarcastic. How the person she is talking to takes it is secondary.
I mean, c'mon... here's a typical excange between a normal person and an AS (I believe there are at least two exchanges almost exactly like this in the series):
Q: "What is your name?"
A: "You may call me Alyce."
Not technically a lie, since the AS is not saying her name is Alyce, but the intent is clearly a lie.
The oaths are next to worthless. Especially since everyone in the Westlands seems to be aware that AS do this so no one ever believes them anyway.
This message last edited by BlackAdder on 07/12/2009 at 05:13:27 AM
Cadsuane lies!
- 06/12/2009 06:10:41 PM
2343 Views
Re: Cadsuane lies!
- 06/12/2009 06:18:39 PM
1551 Views
Sarcasm is one thing
- 06/12/2009 06:43:12 PM
1248 Views
I disagree
- 06/12/2009 06:51:27 PM
1209 Views
RJ has said they're allowed to be sarcastic
- 06/12/2009 07:07:32 PM
1150 Views
How does that jive with the Oaths?
- 06/12/2009 07:13:21 PM
1205 Views
Good point, but in that same book Tamra said that Gitara didn't say anything before dying *NM*
- 06/12/2009 07:53:31 PM
557 Views
Re: Good point, but in that same book Tamra said that Gitara didn't say anything before dying
- 06/12/2009 08:03:36 PM
1274 Views
The Oaths focus on INTENT
- 06/12/2009 10:01:27 PM
1189 Views
Because it isn't a lie
- 06/12/2009 07:44:29 PM
1213 Views
I understand this, I'm not arguing that an AS should not be able to be sarcastic
- 06/12/2009 08:08:15 PM
1174 Views
Re: I understand this, I'm not arguing that an AS should not be able to be sarcastic
- 06/12/2009 08:35:23 PM
1204 Views
Quote for you
- 06/12/2009 08:42:52 PM
1147 Views
The sarcasm was for him repeating himself to her. The "remember" is the part she's refering to.
- 07/12/2009 10:15:06 AM
977 Views
That's why I think this example of sarcasm works as opposed to Cadsuane who makes a false statement
- 07/12/2009 03:17:52 PM
1039 Views
sarcasm is sarcasm. In both instances their is technically a lie.
- 07/12/2009 11:28:02 PM
988 Views
Not at all the case
- 07/12/2009 11:58:42 PM
1059 Views
Do you really believe he waited till the last minute to tell Seonid?
- 14/12/2009 01:32:37 PM
1151 Views
What about the Sheriam thing?
- 07/12/2009 01:49:32 PM
1073 Views
Re: What about the Sheriam thing?
- 07/12/2009 02:15:25 PM
937 Views
But surely an Aes Sedai can answer a question she hasn't fully heard yet.
- 07/12/2009 03:06:34 PM
1180 Views
Sarcasm
- 06/12/2009 07:14:47 PM
1213 Views
It's obviously meant to be sarcasm, I just don't like
- 06/12/2009 07:18:40 PM
1014 Views
Here is what RJ said about it
- 06/12/2009 07:41:18 PM
1179 Views
Well I have to say I think RJ made the wrong call with this one *NM*
- 06/12/2009 07:43:47 PM
501 Views
Agreed.
- 07/12/2009 01:45:39 AM
973 Views
You can already drive a truck through the oaths. Does this one additional tiny gap really matter?
- 07/12/2009 04:07:16 AM
1021 Views
Alys (Moiraine alias) *NM*
- 07/12/2009 05:13:18 AM
1317 Views
what do you think a RL lie detector would tell in this case?
- 07/12/2009 12:27:07 PM
958 Views
in RL you would get warned by the investigator to cooperate
- 07/12/2009 01:04:33 PM
996 Views
But how would the machine reading indicate?
- 07/12/2009 07:04:22 PM
967 Views
Usually you're s'possed to answer with a yes or no. It's easy to tell when you're evasive
- 09/12/2009 10:46:58 PM
1020 Views
Where's the problem?
- 09/12/2009 04:18:40 PM
913 Views
It's in the way the Oath is worded
- 09/12/2009 05:14:39 PM
983 Views
PS You misread my original quote
- 09/12/2009 11:00:56 PM
903 Views
Lies, untruths, sarcasm, and meaning
- 09/12/2009 07:46:25 PM
1072 Views
We are starting understand each other
- 09/12/2009 10:09:41 PM
1010 Views


