But surely an Aes Sedai can answer a question she hasn't fully heard yet.
Legolas Send a noteboard - 07/12/2009 03:06:34 PM
Sheriam betrayed herself by anticipating the question and giving the wrong answer. Under the first oath, such a slip isn't possible. The first oath should have stopped her answering at all until/unless she heard the question, or else to answer differently, by a true statement (eg: Q: are your hair red? A

If she thinks she knows what the question that's coming is, it's not intent to lie if she answers it before the question has been spoken, or before she has realized what it is. I don't know if we've seen any examples of that, but if it's all about intent, it would make little sense that an Aes Sedai found herself unable to give the perfectly honest answer she wanted to give.
Cadsuane lies!
06/12/2009 06:10:41 PM
- 2149 Views
Re: Cadsuane lies!
06/12/2009 06:18:39 PM
- 1356 Views
Sarcasm is one thing
06/12/2009 06:43:12 PM
- 1072 Views
I disagree
06/12/2009 06:51:27 PM
- 1030 Views
RJ has said they're allowed to be sarcastic
06/12/2009 07:07:32 PM
- 983 Views
How does that jive with the Oaths?
06/12/2009 07:13:21 PM
- 1034 Views
Good point, but in that same book Tamra said that Gitara didn't say anything before dying *NM*
06/12/2009 07:53:31 PM
- 475 Views
Re: Good point, but in that same book Tamra said that Gitara didn't say anything before dying
06/12/2009 08:03:36 PM
- 1077 Views
The Oaths focus on INTENT
06/12/2009 10:01:27 PM
- 987 Views
Because it isn't a lie
06/12/2009 07:44:29 PM
- 996 Views
I understand this, I'm not arguing that an AS should not be able to be sarcastic
06/12/2009 08:08:15 PM
- 979 Views
Re: I understand this, I'm not arguing that an AS should not be able to be sarcastic
06/12/2009 08:35:23 PM
- 1019 Views
Quote for you
06/12/2009 08:42:52 PM
- 949 Views
The sarcasm was for him repeating himself to her. The "remember" is the part she's refering to.
07/12/2009 10:15:06 AM
- 791 Views
That's why I think this example of sarcasm works as opposed to Cadsuane who makes a false statement
07/12/2009 03:17:52 PM
- 860 Views
sarcasm is sarcasm. In both instances their is technically a lie.
07/12/2009 11:28:02 PM
- 808 Views
Not at all the case
07/12/2009 11:58:42 PM
- 898 Views
Do you really believe he waited till the last minute to tell Seonid?
14/12/2009 01:32:37 PM
- 973 Views
What about the Sheriam thing?
07/12/2009 01:49:32 PM
- 888 Views
Re: What about the Sheriam thing?
07/12/2009 02:15:25 PM
- 763 Views
But surely an Aes Sedai can answer a question she hasn't fully heard yet.
07/12/2009 03:06:34 PM
- 1002 Views
Sarcasm
06/12/2009 07:14:47 PM
- 1020 Views
It's obviously meant to be sarcasm, I just don't like
06/12/2009 07:18:40 PM
- 819 Views
Here is what RJ said about it
06/12/2009 07:41:18 PM
- 976 Views
Well I have to say I think RJ made the wrong call with this one *NM*
06/12/2009 07:43:47 PM
- 421 Views
Agreed.
07/12/2009 01:45:39 AM
- 772 Views
You can already drive a truck through the oaths. Does this one additional tiny gap really matter?
07/12/2009 04:07:16 AM
- 813 Views
what do you think a RL lie detector would tell in this case?
07/12/2009 12:27:07 PM
- 774 Views
in RL you would get warned by the investigator to cooperate
07/12/2009 01:04:33 PM
- 795 Views
But how would the machine reading indicate?
07/12/2009 07:04:22 PM
- 803 Views
Usually you're s'possed to answer with a yes or no. It's easy to tell when you're evasive
09/12/2009 10:46:58 PM
- 835 Views
Where's the problem?
09/12/2009 04:18:40 PM
- 728 Views
It's in the way the Oath is worded
09/12/2009 05:14:39 PM
- 790 Views
PS You misread my original quote
09/12/2009 11:00:56 PM
- 734 Views
Lies, untruths, sarcasm, and meaning
09/12/2009 07:46:25 PM
- 865 Views
We are starting understand each other
09/12/2009 10:09:41 PM
- 830 Views