Active Users:957 Time:28/06/2026 12:47:46 AM
Re: Let me ask you this... lyringlas Send a noteboard - 23/12/2009 04:30:27 PM
Surely the point of reducing her strength is to bring her down to a level of humility or vulnerability where she cannot use her superior strength as her automatic advantage over everyone else.

In my view, the only purpose of reducing Lanfear in strength would be to make her weaker than some of the other female Forsaken. Else it serves no purpose.



Exactly, she has been slightly lowered in overall strength; however, it isn't necessarily to put female forsaken above her in the power. Instead, I think it was for a couple of other reasons:

1) I think it is to put Lanfear above Cyndane in strength...that alone would piss her off to no end- afterall, if you were a perfectionist, like Lanfear, that was one of the two people responsible for unleashing the dark one on the world and you could no longer live up to your former self wouldn't you be pissed off??
2) Now, Lanfear, who was rivaled by almost no one in her own age and time, is second to some former damane, who is one of the second-rate 3rd age channelers that she loathes so much (not saying that Shai'tan did this intentionally....but then again, knowing the forsaken how he does, maybe he did).
3) We know that she was severed/stilled when she fell through the ter'angreal doorframe, with Moraine, to the Aelfinn's homeland. We know of several women in the series, including Leane, Siuan, and the Aes Sedai from Dumai Well that have been severed. Of these, Leane and Siuan are significantly weaker, because they were healed imperfectly by a female- we know it is imperfect because the other Aes Sedai were healed by a man, and appear to be at their original strength. This last point is my contention though: do we know they are at their original strength, or are they just very close to their original strength (so compared to Leane and Siuan there is no discussion needed about their new strength levels).
This message last edited by lyringlas on 23/12/2009 at 04:59:02 PM
Reply to message
Female Forsaken strength : a new post - 19/11/2009 04:12:35 PM 1992 Views
Except... - 19/11/2009 04:26:32 PM 1008 Views
There's no evidence for that - 19/11/2009 04:31:17 PM 981 Views
It's common sense - 19/11/2009 04:40:01 PM 893 Views
No, it's based on absolutely nothing - 19/11/2009 04:50:30 PM 1031 Views
If you agree that there are stronger damane than Alivia... - 19/11/2009 05:00:05 PM 883 Views
I didn't say that - 19/11/2009 05:07:33 PM 938 Views
Well, I think you are wrong... - 19/11/2009 05:35:27 PM 917 Views
Glad to have you back. Now for the arguments to start! - 19/11/2009 04:29:01 PM 1054 Views
Hmm... - 19/11/2009 04:47:12 PM 1053 Views
Actually, you are the one placing Lanfear immensely high, my list reduced the strength difference... - 19/11/2009 05:05:18 PM 1134 Views
But I'm not - 19/11/2009 05:17:05 PM 1012 Views
Let me ask you this... - 19/11/2009 10:13:12 PM 1064 Views
Very good point *NM* - 20/11/2009 01:38:55 AM 464 Views
One possibility - 20/11/2009 03:18:55 AM 983 Views
All assumption - 20/11/2009 04:11:20 AM 948 Views
Why introduce that concept, if it is just of academic importance? - 20/11/2009 07:41:54 AM 875 Views
You don't know the significance of it at all - 20/11/2009 03:14:46 PM 1015 Views
Why? - 20/11/2009 03:17:51 PM 1545 Views
Re: Why? - 20/11/2009 04:30:50 PM 913 Views
How can you argue in such a way and still keep a straight face (presumably)... - 20/11/2009 05:07:39 PM 903 Views
Re: How can you argue in such a way and still keep a straight face (presumably)... - 21/11/2009 10:55:47 AM 911 Views
Is Graendal the only Forsaken NOT to overstate her own ability then? - 21/11/2009 01:53:28 PM 1026 Views
Probably not in this case - 21/11/2009 11:34:25 PM 895 Views
Your rankings hinge ENTIRELY on whether you have Graendal correctly placed. - 20/11/2009 03:24:22 PM 921 Views
Yeah... entirely - 20/11/2009 04:33:45 PM 874 Views
Okay, "entirely" was a bad choice of word. - 20/11/2009 09:57:52 PM 899 Views
Re: Okay, "entirely" was a bad choice of word. - 21/11/2009 10:48:16 AM 990 Views
Re: Let me ask you this... - 23/12/2009 04:30:27 PM 940 Views
*correction*Re: Let me ask you this... - 23/12/2009 04:32:02 PM 906 Views
my comments w/ edit - 19/11/2009 04:37:27 PM 972 Views
Re: my comments w/ edit - 19/11/2009 04:54:30 PM 1056 Views
Re: my comments w/ edit - 23/12/2009 04:42:15 PM 835 Views
What ever happened to all teh info from wotmania? Especially the FAQs? *NM* - 19/11/2009 05:01:45 PM 613 Views
http://13depository.blogspot.com/ *NM* - 19/11/2009 05:31:01 PM 481 Views
Re: Female Forsaken strength : a new post - 19/11/2009 05:39:10 PM 989 Views
Re: Female Forsaken strength : a new post -- What about Dexterity?? - 19/11/2009 06:44:31 PM 1003 Views
This perfectly matches my understanding of the situation. - 19/11/2009 07:06:31 PM 859 Views
Agreed! This make more sense than the previous list *NM* - 20/11/2009 12:07:37 AM 519 Views
Too many levels - 20/11/2009 01:48:24 AM 978 Views
You are completely right about too many levels. - 20/11/2009 04:17:17 AM 867 Views
21 levels is largely a myth - 20/11/2009 04:27:27 AM 909 Views
Re: 21 levels is largely a myth - 20/11/2009 01:51:17 PM 1002 Views
Thanks for the post. Interesting stuff there. *NM* - 20/11/2009 03:14:12 PM 444 Views
That's good to know. - 20/11/2009 07:56:41 PM 857 Views
I have to disagree for a couple of reasons. - 20/11/2009 04:14:40 AM 1027 Views
Talaan is not stronger than Nynaeve - 28/11/2009 08:27:22 PM 1125 Views
Re: Talaan is not stronger than Nynaeve - 28/11/2009 10:05:15 PM 1131 Views
Talaan has be channeling for 6 or 7 years - 28/11/2009 10:56:12 PM 902 Views
Re: I have to disagree for a couple of reasons. - 30/12/2009 12:37:40 AM 1341 Views
Agree with nearly all - 20/11/2009 04:43:47 AM 848 Views
more hopefully to come - 20/11/2009 08:15:00 PM 829 Views
Thanks KCF, that's a great question to ask. - 20/11/2009 08:28:32 PM 1085 Views
A little more evidence that Nynaeve is stronger than Semirhage - 29/11/2009 12:12:37 AM 930 Views
I agree that Graendal is the 2nd most powerful woman Forsaken - 29/11/2009 04:07:00 PM 839 Views
It's possible - 30/11/2009 08:23:28 PM 891 Views
Re: It's possible - 01/12/2009 06:18:56 PM 959 Views

Reply to Message