I doubt it. Just because someone is insane or have a disordered emotional response rendering them inhuman doesn't meant that they have any advantage.
The fact is, Slayer could have eliminated Perrin, but he couldn't, otherwise this would have been arranged. He could have killed Perrin in TAR, leaving a husk behind. He didn't. That is enough to convince me that Slayer is an enemy whose ability set places him closer to a Wise One Dreamer than a full-blown channeler.
The fact is, Slayer could have eliminated Perrin, but he couldn't, otherwise this would have been arranged. He could have killed Perrin in TAR, leaving a husk behind. He didn't. That is enough to convince me that Slayer is an enemy whose ability set places him closer to a Wise One Dreamer than a full-blown channeler.
He got his powers as gifts from the DO after all. And just because Slayer didn't manage to kill Perrin (who was still needed for the plot), doesn't mean that Slayer isn't a deadly top assassin, who successfully killed Asmo. After all, the Forsaken also didn't manage to kill a ta'veren for obvious plot reasons.
Fain's Myrddraal
- 28/12/2009 01:45:58 PM
2094 Views
Nope, Myrddraal have been nothing but cannon fodder since book four *NM*
- 28/12/2009 03:01:01 PM
574 Views
But what was the purpose then?
- 28/12/2009 03:43:01 PM
1069 Views
Re: Fain's Myrddraal
- 28/12/2009 03:19:37 PM
1051 Views
Slayer also hunts Rand
- 28/12/2009 03:57:11 PM
1105 Views
I think it's possible that Slayer could have killed Asmo
- 28/12/2009 04:35:57 PM
989 Views
The explanations
- 28/12/2009 05:06:02 PM
1260 Views
Perhaps, I still don't buy it, but if that's the way it turns out I won't be shocked
- 28/12/2009 05:20:06 PM
1195 Views
Your reaction would be similar to BS's then
- 28/12/2009 05:57:44 PM
2123 Views
Re: The explanations
- 28/12/2009 08:01:19 PM
940 Views
The case for Graendal was already weak before TGS...
- 28/12/2009 08:13:07 PM
1027 Views
Re: The case for Graendal was already weak before TGS...
- 28/12/2009 10:19:24 PM
1096 Views
The reason is...
- 29/12/2009 11:58:24 AM
1056 Views
The reasoning is very weak.
- 29/12/2009 03:34:19 PM
1072 Views
If you mean...
- 29/12/2009 04:01:25 PM
1155 Views
A few points
- 29/12/2009 04:14:12 PM
980 Views
You are wrong...
- 29/12/2009 04:25:09 PM
975 Views
Key word - "possibly"
- 29/12/2009 04:38:46 PM
990 Views
As said, if you just compare it to Alviarin's mark, it's clear.
- 29/12/2009 05:06:47 PM
943 Views
Re: As said, if you just compare it to Alviarin's mark, it's clear.
- 29/12/2009 06:08:09 PM
879 Views
Well, it protects you of Shadowspawn, not that bad.
- 29/12/2009 06:12:04 PM
969 Views
I don't think what happened to Fain or Slayer are "gifts"
- 29/12/2009 06:26:15 PM
876 Views
Slayer calls it "gifts" in his PoV
- 29/12/2009 06:37:49 PM
918 Views
I think you are stretching the reality a bit
- 29/12/2009 06:42:10 PM
971 Views
You confuse it a bit...
- 29/12/2009 06:57:07 PM
1032 Views
I think you've got it backwards
- 29/12/2009 07:12:02 PM
929 Views
However...
- 29/12/2009 07:16:08 PM
965 Views
I wasn't arguing that point
- 29/12/2009 08:13:25 PM
1198 Views
- 29/12/2009 08:13:25 PM
1198 Views
Some things don't have to be spelled out, if they are that clear...
*NM*
- 29/12/2009 08:18:05 PM
924 Views
*NM*
- 29/12/2009 08:18:05 PM
924 Views
Yes; it is not readily apparant that the mark was made with the TP.
- 29/12/2009 06:12:07 PM
995 Views
Sorry, but that is utter nonsense
- 29/12/2009 06:24:54 PM
1084 Views
You are incorrect; I'm actually thinking that you only skimmed certain sections!
- 29/12/2009 06:38:37 PM
1042 Views
Simply read the books and what the authors said...
- 29/12/2009 06:55:42 PM
977 Views
Sorry, I think you have an opinion and read everything to support it in this case.
- 29/12/2009 07:02:42 PM
947 Views
Ok, then we play dumb, if you like...
- 29/12/2009 07:14:58 PM
1060 Views
You are mistaken on quite a few counts.
- 29/12/2009 04:37:51 PM
1150 Views
Actually...
- 29/12/2009 05:04:54 PM
1051 Views
BWB says...
- 29/12/2009 05:48:40 PM
1265 Views
Well...
- 29/12/2009 06:18:08 PM
1095 Views
Just pointing out that your comment about Lanfear and Moggy not being assassins
- 29/12/2009 06:37:21 PM
1000 Views
No...
- 29/12/2009 06:47:07 PM
1210 Views
Re: No...
- 29/12/2009 07:00:20 PM
1164 Views
Again...
- 29/12/2009 07:10:12 PM
915 Views
So you dismiss the actual assassinations the Forsaken have performed on-screen?
- 29/12/2009 07:26:55 PM
988 Views
Again...
- 29/12/2009 07:47:57 PM
880 Views
I think any Forsaken is capable of doing it.
- 29/12/2009 08:05:10 PM
982 Views
She kidnapped the Sharan's ... who's to say she hasn't killed others? *NM*
- 29/12/2009 08:17:28 PM
487 Views
Yeah, after TFoH! We are looking for clues before LoC, guys! *sigh*
- 29/12/2009 08:31:13 PM
816 Views
Where did I say this was a clue to her doing it?
- 29/12/2009 09:58:29 PM
1057 Views
I don't say...
- 30/12/2009 12:08:27 PM
1169 Views
Most of what you are talking about with Slayer is discoverd after LoC
- 30/12/2009 02:36:18 PM
1056 Views
Re: Well...
- 29/12/2009 06:41:29 PM
979 Views
It becomes clear...
- 29/12/2009 06:59:03 PM
884 Views
Re: Slayer also hunts Rand
- 28/12/2009 04:39:36 PM
1172 Views
As said...
- 28/12/2009 04:54:07 PM
961 Views
Re: As said...
- 28/12/2009 07:49:22 PM
949 Views
It's rather the TP, which makes Slayer inhuman...
- 28/12/2009 08:21:20 PM
952 Views
Fain's Myrddraal killed asmo LOL *NM*
- 29/12/2009 05:26:22 AM
547 Views
