Active Users:475 Time:12/12/2025 11:21:01 PM
Re: Yeah, if you compare it to the Catholic Church... Gerbeaud Send a noteboard - 31/12/2009 02:20:32 PM
We have e.g. "Brother Jim" or "Sister Jane", which implies that they are equal to a person of any status, or "Father John", which even implies a certain superiority. And even the translation of Asha'man with Guardians, implies that an Asha'man is more powerful than you.

Thus, it's a bit curious that the proud and aloof nowadays Aes Sedai still demand to be called servant by lesser persons, although the title "servant" automatically implies a lesser status.

But of course you are right that it's in tradition with the AoL, and therefore understandable (though other traditions were changed as well).


The impression I get is that in the AOL Aes Sedai were indeed more engaged in serving the common good. Yes, they were powerful individuals and respected by non-channelers but the goal of the Hall of the Servants was to serve. As oppposed to the current crop of Aes Sedai, many of whom appear more interested in maintain their own sense of importance and prestige. Of course, some of the current age Aes Sedai are engaged in healing and resolving disputes but many stay in the Tower and devote their energies to political wrangling and petty plots.
Reply to message
It just occured to me - 31/12/2009 10:12:12 AM 1552 Views
I tink they did - 31/12/2009 10:52:32 AM 839 Views
Re: It just occured to me - 31/12/2009 11:07:29 AM 808 Views
Yeah, if you compare it to the Catholic Church... - 31/12/2009 11:34:49 AM 786 Views
Re: Yeah, if you compare it to the Catholic Church... - 31/12/2009 02:20:32 PM 674 Views
In a democracy though... - 31/12/2009 02:38:21 PM 673 Views
Re: Yeah, if you compare it to the Catholic Church... - 31/12/2009 04:30:58 PM 701 Views
Depends on what the actual translation is... - 31/12/2009 04:49:54 PM 679 Views
The translation... - 31/12/2009 06:17:07 PM 694 Views
Look at M'Hael - 31/12/2009 08:12:35 PM 707 Views
No... - 31/12/2009 08:19:18 PM 653 Views
And Sedai is not a title? - 31/12/2009 08:47:03 PM 753 Views
Nope, it is an honorific. - 31/12/2009 09:31:37 PM 817 Views
You're really splitting hairs... - 01/01/2010 04:06:02 PM 921 Views
That's why I said I was. - 01/01/2010 06:19:22 PM 826 Views
My 2 cents... which may only be worth 1 - 01/01/2010 06:39:52 PM 821 Views
I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 06:49:25 PM 805 Views
Re: I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 07:27:57 PM 785 Views
Re: I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 07:37:17 PM 774 Views
Re: I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 08:08:58 PM 812 Views
Re: I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 09:05:45 PM 782 Views
I think we're pretty much in agreement - 01/01/2010 09:26:26 PM 809 Views
I'd agree with that. - 01/01/2010 10:20:52 PM 755 Views
I think it's a pride of humility thing.... - 31/12/2009 06:24:17 PM 737 Views
They don't care. The meaning of the honorific is irrelevant - all significance comes from context - 01/01/2010 06:08:40 AM 714 Views
I Agree - 01/01/2010 08:36:40 AM 656 Views
Re: I Agree - 01/01/2010 03:04:18 PM 645 Views

Reply to Message