Active Users:727 Time:30/01/2026 03:25:51 AM
Re: Yeah, if you compare it to the Catholic Church... Gerbeaud Send a noteboard - 31/12/2009 02:20:32 PM
We have e.g. "Brother Jim" or "Sister Jane", which implies that they are equal to a person of any status, or "Father John", which even implies a certain superiority. And even the translation of Asha'man with Guardians, implies that an Asha'man is more powerful than you.

Thus, it's a bit curious that the proud and aloof nowadays Aes Sedai still demand to be called servant by lesser persons, although the title "servant" automatically implies a lesser status.

But of course you are right that it's in tradition with the AoL, and therefore understandable (though other traditions were changed as well).


The impression I get is that in the AOL Aes Sedai were indeed more engaged in serving the common good. Yes, they were powerful individuals and respected by non-channelers but the goal of the Hall of the Servants was to serve. As oppposed to the current crop of Aes Sedai, many of whom appear more interested in maintain their own sense of importance and prestige. Of course, some of the current age Aes Sedai are engaged in healing and resolving disputes but many stay in the Tower and devote their energies to political wrangling and petty plots.
Reply to message
It just occured to me - 31/12/2009 10:12:12 AM 1576 Views
I tink they did - 31/12/2009 10:52:32 AM 872 Views
Re: It just occured to me - 31/12/2009 11:07:29 AM 832 Views
Yeah, if you compare it to the Catholic Church... - 31/12/2009 11:34:49 AM 805 Views
Re: Yeah, if you compare it to the Catholic Church... - 31/12/2009 02:20:32 PM 697 Views
In a democracy though... - 31/12/2009 02:38:21 PM 697 Views
Re: Yeah, if you compare it to the Catholic Church... - 31/12/2009 04:30:58 PM 728 Views
Depends on what the actual translation is... - 31/12/2009 04:49:54 PM 705 Views
The translation... - 31/12/2009 06:17:07 PM 722 Views
Look at M'Hael - 31/12/2009 08:12:35 PM 729 Views
No... - 31/12/2009 08:19:18 PM 686 Views
And Sedai is not a title? - 31/12/2009 08:47:03 PM 781 Views
Nope, it is an honorific. - 31/12/2009 09:31:37 PM 843 Views
You're really splitting hairs... - 01/01/2010 04:06:02 PM 950 Views
That's why I said I was. - 01/01/2010 06:19:22 PM 855 Views
My 2 cents... which may only be worth 1 - 01/01/2010 06:39:52 PM 849 Views
I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 06:49:25 PM 838 Views
Re: I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 07:27:57 PM 809 Views
Re: I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 07:37:17 PM 805 Views
Re: I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 08:08:58 PM 834 Views
Re: I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 09:05:45 PM 811 Views
I think we're pretty much in agreement - 01/01/2010 09:26:26 PM 830 Views
I'd agree with that. - 01/01/2010 10:20:52 PM 781 Views
I think it's a pride of humility thing.... - 31/12/2009 06:24:17 PM 758 Views
They don't care. The meaning of the honorific is irrelevant - all significance comes from context - 01/01/2010 06:08:40 AM 741 Views
I Agree - 01/01/2010 08:36:40 AM 680 Views
Re: I Agree - 01/01/2010 03:04:18 PM 669 Views

Reply to Message