Active Users:735 Time:18/12/2025 07:14:15 AM
Clearly dead Etzel Send a noteboard - 05/01/2010 07:29:11 PM
RJ came up with this "elegant" and quick way to get rid of the clever Graendal by Rand's use of brute force. I really don't see what the point would be, if Graendal somehow managed to survive, is still around and Rand has to come up with an even better idea to outsmart Graendal. Seems like a pointless twist, which further burdens the plot.

Graendal's PoV in the prologue also wasn't redundant, because it gave us e.g. more clues about Moridin's plans and situation. It also explains why Graendal didn't dare to immediately flee from Arad Doman, when Rand arrived. She had to stay and make contact with him eventually.

BS indicated as well that Graendal is dead by saying that she will just be mentioned a few times in ToM, and that ToM will make it clear, if she is dead.

Besides this, Semirhage's and Elza's ter'angreal bracelets remained, when Rand hit them with balefire on the chest. Considering this one wonders, if Graendal's angreal was even balefired, since Rand just aimed at the palace.
Reply to message
Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 05:44:12 PM 2519 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 06:46:19 PM 1260 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 07:15:41 PM 1126 Views
Nynaeve's boat... - 05/01/2010 07:23:57 PM 1094 Views
Balefire is REALLY confusing. - 05/01/2010 07:41:05 PM 989 Views
Good point ... - 05/01/2010 07:52:04 PM 934 Views
I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 08:45:52 PM 4670 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 09:23:06 PM 924 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 10:30:42 PM 970 Views
Wasn't there a quote somewhere - 06/01/2010 02:05:32 AM 891 Views
Probably a bit of retconning there by Brandon - 06/01/2010 03:34:55 PM 870 Views
BS is definitely wrong here - 06/01/2010 02:01:23 AM 892 Views
Re: BS is definitely wrong here - 06/01/2010 03:36:06 PM 864 Views
There is another way... - 05/01/2010 07:00:31 PM 950 Views
Re: There is another way... - 05/01/2010 07:35:05 PM 976 Views
Re: There is another way... - 05/01/2010 11:05:26 PM 898 Views
Nope - 06/01/2010 04:36:56 AM 960 Views
USe Occam's Razor yourself... - 06/01/2010 05:53:22 AM 1089 Views
and why didn't she invert any of the weaves? - 06/01/2010 05:55:54 AM 909 Views
Exactly! *NM* - 06/01/2010 05:27:52 PM 480 Views
Maybe you cannot invert compulsion? - 06/01/2010 06:56:35 PM 913 Views
so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? seems a little - 06/01/2010 11:31:09 PM 844 Views
Re: so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? - 07/01/2010 12:02:00 AM 805 Views
I am inclined to agree with Datakim here. - 07/01/2010 02:04:42 AM 1111 Views
Why aren't inverted weaves standard practice? - 07/01/2010 01:24:09 AM 946 Views
Balefire is so confusing - 05/01/2010 07:03:29 PM 980 Views
Re: Balefire is so confusing - 05/01/2010 08:52:57 PM 967 Views
She's dead as a bloody doornail. Or whatever that saying is... *NM* - 05/01/2010 07:20:36 PM 485 Views
Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 07:29:11 PM 1109 Views
Re: Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 08:21:16 PM 987 Views
Re: Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 08:41:15 PM 909 Views
I think... - 05/01/2010 09:05:48 PM 959 Views
No way. - 05/01/2010 07:31:12 PM 1005 Views
Re: No way. - 05/01/2010 08:31:54 PM 884 Views
Re: No way. - 05/01/2010 10:16:03 PM 940 Views
Graendal's as dead as BS/RJ makes her. *NM* - 06/01/2010 02:40:46 AM 460 Views
She's dead as dead gets. - 06/01/2010 01:43:34 AM 843 Views
Dead is my bet - 06/01/2010 11:48:46 AM 861 Views
She's dead *NM* - 06/01/2010 11:58:34 AM 456 Views
Dead. *NM* - 06/01/2010 03:58:19 PM 462 Views
I think she's alive. - 06/01/2010 06:12:50 PM 892 Views
Compulsion is rather useless isn't it? - 06/01/2010 07:44:42 PM 997 Views
It may take an exceptional Delver/Healer - 06/01/2010 08:49:37 PM 943 Views
What if.. - 06/01/2010 10:41:44 PM 854 Views
I'll roll my eyes, and snort if she's alive - 08/01/2010 04:21:20 AM 848 Views
Well... - 10/01/2010 03:24:39 AM 1081 Views

Reply to Message