Active Users:415 Time:17/06/2025 01:36:26 AM
Clearly dead Etzel Send a noteboard - 05/01/2010 07:29:11 PM
RJ came up with this "elegant" and quick way to get rid of the clever Graendal by Rand's use of brute force. I really don't see what the point would be, if Graendal somehow managed to survive, is still around and Rand has to come up with an even better idea to outsmart Graendal. Seems like a pointless twist, which further burdens the plot.

Graendal's PoV in the prologue also wasn't redundant, because it gave us e.g. more clues about Moridin's plans and situation. It also explains why Graendal didn't dare to immediately flee from Arad Doman, when Rand arrived. She had to stay and make contact with him eventually.

BS indicated as well that Graendal is dead by saying that she will just be mentioned a few times in ToM, and that ToM will make it clear, if she is dead.

Besides this, Semirhage's and Elza's ter'angreal bracelets remained, when Rand hit them with balefire on the chest. Considering this one wonders, if Graendal's angreal was even balefired, since Rand just aimed at the palace.
Reply to message
Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 05:44:12 PM 2397 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 06:46:19 PM 1151 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 07:15:41 PM 1019 Views
Nynaeve's boat... - 05/01/2010 07:23:57 PM 987 Views
Balefire is REALLY confusing. - 05/01/2010 07:41:05 PM 868 Views
Good point ... - 05/01/2010 07:52:04 PM 838 Views
I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 08:45:52 PM 4566 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 09:23:06 PM 824 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 10:30:42 PM 838 Views
Wasn't there a quote somewhere - 06/01/2010 02:05:32 AM 759 Views
Probably a bit of retconning there by Brandon - 06/01/2010 03:34:55 PM 788 Views
BS is definitely wrong here - 06/01/2010 02:01:23 AM 807 Views
Re: BS is definitely wrong here - 06/01/2010 03:36:06 PM 780 Views
There is another way... - 05/01/2010 07:00:31 PM 826 Views
Re: There is another way... - 05/01/2010 07:35:05 PM 862 Views
Re: There is another way... - 05/01/2010 11:05:26 PM 777 Views
Nope - 06/01/2010 04:36:56 AM 858 Views
USe Occam's Razor yourself... - 06/01/2010 05:53:22 AM 980 Views
and why didn't she invert any of the weaves? - 06/01/2010 05:55:54 AM 806 Views
Exactly! *NM* - 06/01/2010 05:27:52 PM 424 Views
Maybe you cannot invert compulsion? - 06/01/2010 06:56:35 PM 831 Views
so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? seems a little - 06/01/2010 11:31:09 PM 743 Views
Re: so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? - 07/01/2010 12:02:00 AM 686 Views
I am inclined to agree with Datakim here. - 07/01/2010 02:04:42 AM 1005 Views
Why aren't inverted weaves standard practice? - 07/01/2010 01:24:09 AM 844 Views
Balefire is so confusing - 05/01/2010 07:03:29 PM 860 Views
Re: Balefire is so confusing - 05/01/2010 08:52:57 PM 838 Views
She's dead as a bloody doornail. Or whatever that saying is... *NM* - 05/01/2010 07:20:36 PM 419 Views
Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 07:29:11 PM 1008 Views
Re: Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 08:21:16 PM 873 Views
Re: Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 08:41:15 PM 822 Views
I think... - 05/01/2010 09:05:48 PM 832 Views
No way. - 05/01/2010 07:31:12 PM 900 Views
Re: No way. - 05/01/2010 08:31:54 PM 767 Views
Re: No way. - 05/01/2010 10:16:03 PM 813 Views
Graendal's as dead as BS/RJ makes her. *NM* - 06/01/2010 02:40:46 AM 408 Views
She's dead as dead gets. - 06/01/2010 01:43:34 AM 749 Views
Dead is my bet - 06/01/2010 11:48:46 AM 773 Views
She's dead *NM* - 06/01/2010 11:58:34 AM 390 Views
Dead. *NM* - 06/01/2010 03:58:19 PM 393 Views
I think she's alive. - 06/01/2010 06:12:50 PM 788 Views
Compulsion is rather useless isn't it? - 06/01/2010 07:44:42 PM 879 Views
It may take an exceptional Delver/Healer - 06/01/2010 08:49:37 PM 840 Views
What if.. - 06/01/2010 10:41:44 PM 745 Views
I'll roll my eyes, and snort if she's alive - 08/01/2010 04:21:20 AM 764 Views
Well... - 10/01/2010 03:24:39 AM 969 Views

Reply to Message