Active Users:913 Time:07/02/2026 04:50:04 PM
Clearly dead Etzel Send a noteboard - 05/01/2010 07:29:11 PM
RJ came up with this "elegant" and quick way to get rid of the clever Graendal by Rand's use of brute force. I really don't see what the point would be, if Graendal somehow managed to survive, is still around and Rand has to come up with an even better idea to outsmart Graendal. Seems like a pointless twist, which further burdens the plot.

Graendal's PoV in the prologue also wasn't redundant, because it gave us e.g. more clues about Moridin's plans and situation. It also explains why Graendal didn't dare to immediately flee from Arad Doman, when Rand arrived. She had to stay and make contact with him eventually.

BS indicated as well that Graendal is dead by saying that she will just be mentioned a few times in ToM, and that ToM will make it clear, if she is dead.

Besides this, Semirhage's and Elza's ter'angreal bracelets remained, when Rand hit them with balefire on the chest. Considering this one wonders, if Graendal's angreal was even balefired, since Rand just aimed at the palace.
Reply to message
Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 05:44:12 PM 2562 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 06:46:19 PM 1309 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 07:15:41 PM 1153 Views
Nynaeve's boat... - 05/01/2010 07:23:57 PM 1130 Views
Balefire is REALLY confusing. - 05/01/2010 07:41:05 PM 1028 Views
Good point ... - 05/01/2010 07:52:04 PM 973 Views
I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 08:45:52 PM 4702 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 09:23:06 PM 955 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 10:30:42 PM 1009 Views
Wasn't there a quote somewhere - 06/01/2010 02:05:32 AM 927 Views
Probably a bit of retconning there by Brandon - 06/01/2010 03:34:55 PM 908 Views
BS is definitely wrong here - 06/01/2010 02:01:23 AM 924 Views
Re: BS is definitely wrong here - 06/01/2010 03:36:06 PM 898 Views
There is another way... - 05/01/2010 07:00:31 PM 986 Views
Re: There is another way... - 05/01/2010 07:35:05 PM 1016 Views
Re: There is another way... - 05/01/2010 11:05:26 PM 928 Views
Nope - 06/01/2010 04:36:56 AM 993 Views
USe Occam's Razor yourself... - 06/01/2010 05:53:22 AM 1114 Views
and why didn't she invert any of the weaves? - 06/01/2010 05:55:54 AM 939 Views
Exactly! *NM* - 06/01/2010 05:27:52 PM 495 Views
Maybe you cannot invert compulsion? - 06/01/2010 06:56:35 PM 950 Views
so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? seems a little - 06/01/2010 11:31:09 PM 878 Views
Re: so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? - 07/01/2010 12:02:00 AM 837 Views
I am inclined to agree with Datakim here. - 07/01/2010 02:04:42 AM 1141 Views
Why aren't inverted weaves standard practice? - 07/01/2010 01:24:09 AM 984 Views
Balefire is so confusing - 05/01/2010 07:03:29 PM 1018 Views
Re: Balefire is so confusing - 05/01/2010 08:52:57 PM 1001 Views
She's dead as a bloody doornail. Or whatever that saying is... *NM* - 05/01/2010 07:20:36 PM 496 Views
Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 07:29:11 PM 1160 Views
Re: Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 08:21:16 PM 1019 Views
Re: Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 08:41:15 PM 940 Views
I think... - 05/01/2010 09:05:48 PM 985 Views
No way. - 05/01/2010 07:31:12 PM 1036 Views
Re: No way. - 05/01/2010 08:31:54 PM 913 Views
Re: No way. - 05/01/2010 10:16:03 PM 977 Views
Graendal's as dead as BS/RJ makes her. *NM* - 06/01/2010 02:40:46 AM 472 Views
She's dead as dead gets. - 06/01/2010 01:43:34 AM 877 Views
Dead is my bet - 06/01/2010 11:48:46 AM 892 Views
She's dead *NM* - 06/01/2010 11:58:34 AM 466 Views
Dead. *NM* - 06/01/2010 03:58:19 PM 474 Views
I think she's alive. - 06/01/2010 06:12:50 PM 930 Views
Compulsion is rather useless isn't it? - 06/01/2010 07:44:42 PM 1027 Views
It may take an exceptional Delver/Healer - 06/01/2010 08:49:37 PM 980 Views
What if.. - 06/01/2010 10:41:44 PM 886 Views
I'll roll my eyes, and snort if she's alive - 08/01/2010 04:21:20 AM 880 Views
Well... - 10/01/2010 03:24:39 AM 1126 Views

Reply to Message