Active Users:1121 Time:02/11/2025 07:42:10 AM
Clearly dead Etzel Send a noteboard - 05/01/2010 07:29:11 PM
RJ came up with this "elegant" and quick way to get rid of the clever Graendal by Rand's use of brute force. I really don't see what the point would be, if Graendal somehow managed to survive, is still around and Rand has to come up with an even better idea to outsmart Graendal. Seems like a pointless twist, which further burdens the plot.

Graendal's PoV in the prologue also wasn't redundant, because it gave us e.g. more clues about Moridin's plans and situation. It also explains why Graendal didn't dare to immediately flee from Arad Doman, when Rand arrived. She had to stay and make contact with him eventually.

BS indicated as well that Graendal is dead by saying that she will just be mentioned a few times in ToM, and that ToM will make it clear, if she is dead.

Besides this, Semirhage's and Elza's ter'angreal bracelets remained, when Rand hit them with balefire on the chest. Considering this one wonders, if Graendal's angreal was even balefired, since Rand just aimed at the palace.
Reply to message
Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 05:44:12 PM 2490 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 06:46:19 PM 1224 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 07:15:41 PM 1086 Views
Nynaeve's boat... - 05/01/2010 07:23:57 PM 1059 Views
Balefire is REALLY confusing. - 05/01/2010 07:41:05 PM 954 Views
Good point ... - 05/01/2010 07:52:04 PM 904 Views
I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 08:45:52 PM 4629 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 09:23:06 PM 885 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 10:30:42 PM 929 Views
Wasn't there a quote somewhere - 06/01/2010 02:05:32 AM 841 Views
Probably a bit of retconning there by Brandon - 06/01/2010 03:34:55 PM 843 Views
BS is definitely wrong here - 06/01/2010 02:01:23 AM 865 Views
Re: BS is definitely wrong here - 06/01/2010 03:36:06 PM 836 Views
There is another way... - 05/01/2010 07:00:31 PM 912 Views
Re: There is another way... - 05/01/2010 07:35:05 PM 941 Views
Re: There is another way... - 05/01/2010 11:05:26 PM 856 Views
Nope - 06/01/2010 04:36:56 AM 921 Views
USe Occam's Razor yourself... - 06/01/2010 05:53:22 AM 1051 Views
and why didn't she invert any of the weaves? - 06/01/2010 05:55:54 AM 873 Views
Exactly! *NM* - 06/01/2010 05:27:52 PM 460 Views
Maybe you cannot invert compulsion? - 06/01/2010 06:56:35 PM 891 Views
so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? seems a little - 06/01/2010 11:31:09 PM 805 Views
Re: so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? - 07/01/2010 12:02:00 AM 757 Views
I am inclined to agree with Datakim here. - 07/01/2010 02:04:42 AM 1068 Views
Why aren't inverted weaves standard practice? - 07/01/2010 01:24:09 AM 909 Views
Balefire is so confusing - 05/01/2010 07:03:29 PM 947 Views
Re: Balefire is so confusing - 05/01/2010 08:52:57 PM 928 Views
She's dead as a bloody doornail. Or whatever that saying is... *NM* - 05/01/2010 07:20:36 PM 468 Views
Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 07:29:11 PM 1066 Views
Re: Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 08:21:16 PM 949 Views
Re: Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 08:41:15 PM 879 Views
I think... - 05/01/2010 09:05:48 PM 912 Views
No way. - 05/01/2010 07:31:12 PM 969 Views
Re: No way. - 05/01/2010 08:31:54 PM 839 Views
Re: No way. - 05/01/2010 10:16:03 PM 901 Views
Graendal's as dead as BS/RJ makes her. *NM* - 06/01/2010 02:40:46 AM 444 Views
She's dead as dead gets. - 06/01/2010 01:43:34 AM 812 Views
Dead is my bet - 06/01/2010 11:48:46 AM 835 Views
She's dead *NM* - 06/01/2010 11:58:34 AM 433 Views
Dead. *NM* - 06/01/2010 03:58:19 PM 435 Views
I think she's alive. - 06/01/2010 06:12:50 PM 863 Views
Compulsion is rather useless isn't it? - 06/01/2010 07:44:42 PM 956 Views
It may take an exceptional Delver/Healer - 06/01/2010 08:49:37 PM 907 Views
What if.. - 06/01/2010 10:41:44 PM 811 Views
I'll roll my eyes, and snort if she's alive - 08/01/2010 04:21:20 AM 821 Views
Well... - 10/01/2010 03:24:39 AM 1034 Views

Reply to Message