Active Users:740 Time:13/05/2026 01:15:18 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Good point ... Shishka Send a noteboard - 05/01/2010 07:52:04 PM
Nynaeve's boat in aCoS proves nothing. It moved back a hundred paces because the oarsmen were balefired.


Ah yes, you're right. That wasn't something I had thought about until I started replying to randfandom's post - I should have thought about it more before replying. :<img class=' />

If the boat had a thread, one part of it being balefired would have meant the whole boat would be balefired. That did not happen.


Also a good point. This reminds of something I had though about at one time or another, with respect to objects having threads (which I'd forgotten about until just now). If objects have threads, then each component of the boat (hull plank, sail, rudder, etc.) should have had a thread before the boat was constructed. Do they all combine into one thread, when the various components are combined to construct the boat? Or do they remain individual threads?

Much easier to associate threads with living bodies (I'd say souls, but RJ said that soulless, living bodies still have threads).

Except ... as the DO causes the Pattern to unravel, we see how it affects buildings/hallways/etc., and not just people. So, those buildings/hallways/etc. are a part of the Pattern, it would seem, and therefore the theory that they also have threads becomes a little more substantial, I think.

I'm sure that the coat scene in tGS was a mistake, and BS was mistaken when he said objects had threads.


Could be, but I'm defintitely not "sure".
Rise and fall, turn the Wheel,
'cause all life is
is really just a circle.

-BHT&tM
Reply to message
Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) Shishka - 05/01/2010 05:44:12 PM 2630 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) randfandom - 05/01/2010 06:46:19 PM 1371 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) Shishka - 05/01/2010 07:15:41 PM 1224 Views
Nynaeve's boat... fionwe1987 - 05/01/2010 07:23:57 PM 1190 Views
Balefire is REALLY confusing. Datakim - 05/01/2010 07:41:05 PM 1097 Views
Good point ... Shishka - 05/01/2010 07:52:04 PM 1037 Views
I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. Fanatic-Templar - 05/01/2010 08:45:52 PM 4782 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. Shishka - 05/01/2010 09:23:06 PM 1019 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. Fanatic-Templar - 05/01/2010 10:30:42 PM 1070 Views
Wasn't there a quote somewhere BlackAdder - 06/01/2010 02:05:32 AM 998 Views
Probably a bit of retconning there by Brandon Lord Haart - 06/01/2010 03:34:55 PM 969 Views
BS is definitely wrong here BlackAdder - 06/01/2010 02:01:23 AM 997 Views
Re: BS is definitely wrong here Lord Haart - 06/01/2010 03:36:06 PM 961 Views
There is another way... fionwe1987 - 05/01/2010 07:00:31 PM 1049 Views
Re: There is another way... Shishka - 05/01/2010 07:35:05 PM 1086 Views
Re: There is another way... fionwe1987 - 05/01/2010 11:05:26 PM 999 Views
Nope randfandom - 06/01/2010 04:36:56 AM 1065 Views
USe Occam's Razor yourself... fionwe1987 - 06/01/2010 05:53:22 AM 1184 Views
and why didn't she invert any of the weaves? darius_sedai - 06/01/2010 05:55:54 AM 992 Views
Exactly! *NM* fionwe1987 - 06/01/2010 05:27:52 PM 520 Views
Maybe you cannot invert compulsion? Datakim - 06/01/2010 06:56:35 PM 1016 Views
so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? seems a little darius_sedai - 06/01/2010 11:31:09 PM 952 Views
Re: so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? Datakim - 07/01/2010 12:02:00 AM 895 Views
I am inclined to agree with Datakim here. Fanatic-Templar - 07/01/2010 02:04:42 AM 1203 Views
Why aren't inverted weaves standard practice? BlackAdder - 07/01/2010 01:24:09 AM 1045 Views
Balefire is so confusing Datakim - 05/01/2010 07:03:29 PM 1085 Views
Re: Balefire is so confusing Shishka - 05/01/2010 08:52:57 PM 1070 Views
She's dead as a bloody doornail. Or whatever that saying is... *NM* lilltempest - 05/01/2010 07:20:36 PM 528 Views
Clearly dead Etzel - 05/01/2010 07:29:11 PM 1217 Views
Re: Clearly dead Shishka - 05/01/2010 08:21:16 PM 1094 Views
Re: Clearly dead Datakim - 05/01/2010 08:41:15 PM 1014 Views
I think... Etzel - 05/01/2010 09:05:48 PM 1050 Views
No way. Gher - 05/01/2010 07:31:12 PM 1108 Views
Re: No way. Shishka - 05/01/2010 08:31:54 PM 976 Views
Re: No way. Gher - 05/01/2010 10:16:03 PM 1049 Views
Graendal's as dead as BS/RJ makes her. *NM* Great Lord of Chaos - 06/01/2010 02:40:46 AM 504 Views
She's dead as dead gets. everynametaken - 06/01/2010 01:43:34 AM 945 Views
Dead is my bet Sidious - 06/01/2010 11:48:46 AM 955 Views
She's dead *NM* Simon - 06/01/2010 11:58:34 AM 500 Views
Dead. *NM* AgentOrange - 06/01/2010 03:58:19 PM 513 Views
I think she's alive. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 06/01/2010 06:12:50 PM 999 Views
Compulsion is rather useless isn't it? Syraelle - 06/01/2010 07:44:42 PM 1088 Views
It may take an exceptional Delver/Healer Gher - 06/01/2010 08:49:37 PM 1047 Views
perhaps, but still I have a hard time believing Graendal didn't invert the weaves! darius_sedai - 06/01/2010 11:06:49 PM 987 Views
Re: perhaps, but still I have a hard time believing Graendal didn't invert the weaves! RugbyPlayingAshaman - 07/01/2010 03:42:17 PM 1030 Views
What if.. Tweak - 06/01/2010 10:41:44 PM 942 Views
I'll roll my eyes, and snort if she's alive Wotmaniac Reborn - 08/01/2010 04:21:20 AM 952 Views
Well... Heiko - 10/01/2010 03:24:39 AM 1190 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes