1) Objects don't have threads in the Pattern, so destroying the angreal doesn't undo anything, it just destroys the angreal.
This seems to be a bone of contention. See Datakim's post above, for evidence to the contrary.
2) Why would Graendal ever take it off? It's a ring, she can wear it 24/10, and I would be very surprised if she didn't.
That's a good point. If it were a bulky statue or something, you could see her putting it down. But a ring, in a situation where she would presumably have been more cautious/alert than normal? It does seem unlikely.
Graendal is dead. I actually didn't get a huge letdown over her death. I can't really think of any other way for Rand to get rid of her. She was smarter than him, and she was never going to stand and fight him. He beat her.
I don't have a problem with Graendal's death in this manner, either. I was just trying to think of a plausible way she may still be alive. But, all the feedback I'm getting is making me think that my "plausible" way is not so "plausible" after all.
Rise and fall, turn the Wheel,
'cause all life is
is really just a circle.
-BHT&tM
'cause all life is
is really just a circle.
-BHT&tM
Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?)
05/01/2010 05:44:12 PM
- 2207 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?)
05/01/2010 06:46:19 PM
- 970 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?)
05/01/2010 07:15:41 PM
- 854 Views
Nynaeve's boat...
05/01/2010 07:23:57 PM
- 794 Views
Good point ...
05/01/2010 07:52:04 PM
- 663 Views
I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads.
05/01/2010 08:45:52 PM
- 4408 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads.
05/01/2010 09:23:06 PM
- 633 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads.
05/01/2010 10:30:42 PM
- 666 Views
There is another way...
05/01/2010 07:00:31 PM
- 656 Views
Nope
06/01/2010 04:36:56 AM
- 685 Views
USe Occam's Razor yourself...
06/01/2010 05:53:22 AM
- 792 Views
and why didn't she invert any of the weaves?
06/01/2010 05:55:54 AM
- 619 Views
Maybe you cannot invert compulsion?
06/01/2010 06:56:35 PM
- 654 Views
so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? seems a little
06/01/2010 11:31:09 PM
- 570 Views
Re: so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted?
07/01/2010 12:02:00 AM
- 513 Views
She's dead as a bloody doornail. Or whatever that saying is... *NM*
05/01/2010 07:20:36 PM
- 332 Views
I think she's alive.
06/01/2010 06:12:50 PM
- 619 Views
Compulsion is rather useless isn't it?
06/01/2010 07:44:42 PM
- 698 Views
It may take an exceptional Delver/Healer
06/01/2010 08:49:37 PM
- 669 Views
perhaps, but still I have a hard time believing Graendal didn't invert the weaves!
06/01/2010 11:06:49 PM
- 606 Views
Re: perhaps, but still I have a hard time believing Graendal didn't invert the weaves!
07/01/2010 03:42:17 PM
- 632 Views