Active Users:2048 Time:25/03/2026 06:19:08 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Good point ... Shishka Send a noteboard - 05/01/2010 07:52:04 PM
Nynaeve's boat in aCoS proves nothing. It moved back a hundred paces because the oarsmen were balefired.


Ah yes, you're right. That wasn't something I had thought about until I started replying to randfandom's post - I should have thought about it more before replying. :<img class=' />

If the boat had a thread, one part of it being balefired would have meant the whole boat would be balefired. That did not happen.


Also a good point. This reminds of something I had though about at one time or another, with respect to objects having threads (which I'd forgotten about until just now). If objects have threads, then each component of the boat (hull plank, sail, rudder, etc.) should have had a thread before the boat was constructed. Do they all combine into one thread, when the various components are combined to construct the boat? Or do they remain individual threads?

Much easier to associate threads with living bodies (I'd say souls, but RJ said that soulless, living bodies still have threads).

Except ... as the DO causes the Pattern to unravel, we see how it affects buildings/hallways/etc., and not just people. So, those buildings/hallways/etc. are a part of the Pattern, it would seem, and therefore the theory that they also have threads becomes a little more substantial, I think.

I'm sure that the coat scene in tGS was a mistake, and BS was mistaken when he said objects had threads.


Could be, but I'm defintitely not "sure".
Rise and fall, turn the Wheel,
'cause all life is
is really just a circle.

-BHT&tM
Reply to message
Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) Shishka - 05/01/2010 05:44:12 PM 2584 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) randfandom - 05/01/2010 06:46:19 PM 1331 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) Shishka - 05/01/2010 07:15:41 PM 1178 Views
Nynaeve's boat... fionwe1987 - 05/01/2010 07:23:57 PM 1152 Views
Balefire is REALLY confusing. Datakim - 05/01/2010 07:41:05 PM 1057 Views
Good point ... Shishka - 05/01/2010 07:52:04 PM 996 Views
I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. Fanatic-Templar - 05/01/2010 08:45:52 PM 4740 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. Shishka - 05/01/2010 09:23:06 PM 979 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. Fanatic-Templar - 05/01/2010 10:30:42 PM 1033 Views
Wasn't there a quote somewhere BlackAdder - 06/01/2010 02:05:32 AM 954 Views
Probably a bit of retconning there by Brandon Lord Haart - 06/01/2010 03:34:55 PM 936 Views
BS is definitely wrong here BlackAdder - 06/01/2010 02:01:23 AM 954 Views
Re: BS is definitely wrong here Lord Haart - 06/01/2010 03:36:06 PM 918 Views
There is another way... fionwe1987 - 05/01/2010 07:00:31 PM 1010 Views
Re: There is another way... Shishka - 05/01/2010 07:35:05 PM 1042 Views
Re: There is another way... fionwe1987 - 05/01/2010 11:05:26 PM 949 Views
Nope randfandom - 06/01/2010 04:36:56 AM 1018 Views
USe Occam's Razor yourself... fionwe1987 - 06/01/2010 05:53:22 AM 1148 Views
and why didn't she invert any of the weaves? darius_sedai - 06/01/2010 05:55:54 AM 958 Views
Exactly! *NM* fionwe1987 - 06/01/2010 05:27:52 PM 502 Views
Maybe you cannot invert compulsion? Datakim - 06/01/2010 06:56:35 PM 971 Views
so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? seems a little darius_sedai - 06/01/2010 11:31:09 PM 906 Views
Re: so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? Datakim - 07/01/2010 12:02:00 AM 853 Views
I am inclined to agree with Datakim here. Fanatic-Templar - 07/01/2010 02:04:42 AM 1162 Views
Why aren't inverted weaves standard practice? BlackAdder - 07/01/2010 01:24:09 AM 1004 Views
Balefire is so confusing Datakim - 05/01/2010 07:03:29 PM 1043 Views
Re: Balefire is so confusing Shishka - 05/01/2010 08:52:57 PM 1023 Views
She's dead as a bloody doornail. Or whatever that saying is... *NM* lilltempest - 05/01/2010 07:20:36 PM 506 Views
Clearly dead Etzel - 05/01/2010 07:29:11 PM 1186 Views
Re: Clearly dead Shishka - 05/01/2010 08:21:16 PM 1049 Views
Re: Clearly dead Datakim - 05/01/2010 08:41:15 PM 969 Views
I think... Etzel - 05/01/2010 09:05:48 PM 1004 Views
No way. Gher - 05/01/2010 07:31:12 PM 1072 Views
Re: No way. Shishka - 05/01/2010 08:31:54 PM 939 Views
Re: No way. Gher - 05/01/2010 10:16:03 PM 1004 Views
Graendal's as dead as BS/RJ makes her. *NM* Great Lord of Chaos - 06/01/2010 02:40:46 AM 479 Views
She's dead as dead gets. everynametaken - 06/01/2010 01:43:34 AM 907 Views
Dead is my bet Sidious - 06/01/2010 11:48:46 AM 913 Views
She's dead *NM* Simon - 06/01/2010 11:58:34 AM 478 Views
Dead. *NM* AgentOrange - 06/01/2010 03:58:19 PM 486 Views
I think she's alive. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 06/01/2010 06:12:50 PM 955 Views
Compulsion is rather useless isn't it? Syraelle - 06/01/2010 07:44:42 PM 1049 Views
It may take an exceptional Delver/Healer Gher - 06/01/2010 08:49:37 PM 1000 Views
perhaps, but still I have a hard time believing Graendal didn't invert the weaves! darius_sedai - 06/01/2010 11:06:49 PM 946 Views
Re: perhaps, but still I have a hard time believing Graendal didn't invert the weaves! RugbyPlayingAshaman - 07/01/2010 03:42:17 PM 987 Views
What if.. Tweak - 06/01/2010 10:41:44 PM 904 Views
I'll roll my eyes, and snort if she's alive Wotmaniac Reborn - 08/01/2010 04:21:20 AM 906 Views
Well... Heiko - 10/01/2010 03:24:39 AM 1145 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes