Active Users:1146 Time:13/11/2026 12:50:31 PM
Clearly dead Etzel Send a noteboard - 05/01/2010 07:29:11 PM
RJ came up with this "elegant" and quick way to get rid of the clever Graendal by Rand's use of brute force. I really don't see what the point would be, if Graendal somehow managed to survive, is still around and Rand has to come up with an even better idea to outsmart Graendal. Seems like a pointless twist, which further burdens the plot.

Graendal's PoV in the prologue also wasn't redundant, because it gave us e.g. more clues about Moridin's plans and situation. It also explains why Graendal didn't dare to immediately flee from Arad Doman, when Rand arrived. She had to stay and make contact with him eventually.

BS indicated as well that Graendal is dead by saying that she will just be mentioned a few times in ToM, and that ToM will make it clear, if she is dead.

Besides this, Semirhage's and Elza's ter'angreal bracelets remained, when Rand hit them with balefire on the chest. Considering this one wonders, if Graendal's angreal was even balefired, since Rand just aimed at the palace.
Reply to message
Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 05:44:12 PM 2770 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 06:46:19 PM 1497 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 07:15:41 PM 1377 Views
Nynaeve's boat... - 05/01/2010 07:23:57 PM 1322 Views
Balefire is REALLY confusing. - 05/01/2010 07:41:05 PM 1236 Views
Good point ... - 05/01/2010 07:52:04 PM 1158 Views
I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 08:45:52 PM 4900 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 09:23:06 PM 1147 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 10:30:42 PM 1202 Views
Wasn't there a quote somewhere - 06/01/2010 02:05:32 AM 1119 Views
Probably a bit of retconning there by Brandon - 06/01/2010 03:34:55 PM 1110 Views
BS is definitely wrong here - 06/01/2010 02:01:23 AM 1111 Views
Re: BS is definitely wrong here - 06/01/2010 03:36:06 PM 1076 Views
There is another way... - 05/01/2010 07:00:31 PM 1177 Views
Re: There is another way... - 05/01/2010 07:35:05 PM 1253 Views
Re: There is another way... - 05/01/2010 11:05:26 PM 1114 Views
Nope - 06/01/2010 04:36:56 AM 1220 Views
USe Occam's Razor yourself... - 06/01/2010 05:53:22 AM 1306 Views
and why didn't she invert any of the weaves? - 06/01/2010 05:55:54 AM 1110 Views
Exactly! *NM* - 06/01/2010 05:27:52 PM 593 Views
Maybe you cannot invert compulsion? - 06/01/2010 06:56:35 PM 1140 Views
so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? seems a little - 06/01/2010 11:31:09 PM 1091 Views
Re: so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? - 07/01/2010 12:02:00 AM 1061 Views
I am inclined to agree with Datakim here. - 07/01/2010 02:04:42 AM 1330 Views
Why aren't inverted weaves standard practice? - 07/01/2010 01:24:09 AM 1151 Views
Balefire is so confusing - 05/01/2010 07:03:29 PM 1213 Views
Re: Balefire is so confusing - 05/01/2010 08:52:57 PM 1208 Views
She's dead as a bloody doornail. Or whatever that saying is... *NM* - 05/01/2010 07:20:36 PM 591 Views
Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 07:29:11 PM 1355 Views
Re: Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 08:21:16 PM 1245 Views
Re: Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 08:41:15 PM 1131 Views
I think... - 05/01/2010 09:05:48 PM 1167 Views
No way. - 05/01/2010 07:31:12 PM 1219 Views
Re: No way. - 05/01/2010 08:31:54 PM 1091 Views
Re: No way. - 05/01/2010 10:16:03 PM 1162 Views
Graendal's as dead as BS/RJ makes her. *NM* - 06/01/2010 02:40:46 AM 575 Views
She's dead as dead gets. - 06/01/2010 01:43:34 AM 1062 Views
Dead is my bet - 06/01/2010 11:48:46 AM 1070 Views
She's dead *NM* - 06/01/2010 11:58:34 AM 613 Views
Dead. *NM* - 06/01/2010 03:58:19 PM 578 Views
I think she's alive. - 06/01/2010 06:12:50 PM 1136 Views
Compulsion is rather useless isn't it? - 06/01/2010 07:44:42 PM 1200 Views
It may take an exceptional Delver/Healer - 06/01/2010 08:49:37 PM 1179 Views
What if.. - 06/01/2010 10:41:44 PM 1087 Views
I'll roll my eyes, and snort if she's alive - 08/01/2010 04:21:20 AM 1071 Views
Well... - 10/01/2010 03:24:39 AM 1305 Views

Reply to Message