Active Users:288 Time:13/05/2024 07:59:01 PM
Clearly dead Etzel Send a noteboard - 05/01/2010 07:29:11 PM
RJ came up with this "elegant" and quick way to get rid of the clever Graendal by Rand's use of brute force. I really don't see what the point would be, if Graendal somehow managed to survive, is still around and Rand has to come up with an even better idea to outsmart Graendal. Seems like a pointless twist, which further burdens the plot.

Graendal's PoV in the prologue also wasn't redundant, because it gave us e.g. more clues about Moridin's plans and situation. It also explains why Graendal didn't dare to immediately flee from Arad Doman, when Rand arrived. She had to stay and make contact with him eventually.

BS indicated as well that Graendal is dead by saying that she will just be mentioned a few times in ToM, and that ToM will make it clear, if she is dead.

Besides this, Semirhage's and Elza's ter'angreal bracelets remained, when Rand hit them with balefire on the chest. Considering this one wonders, if Graendal's angreal was even balefired, since Rand just aimed at the palace.
Reply to message
Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 05:44:12 PM 2207 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 06:46:19 PM 970 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 07:15:41 PM 854 Views
Nynaeve's boat... - 05/01/2010 07:23:57 PM 794 Views
Balefire is REALLY confusing. - 05/01/2010 07:41:05 PM 698 Views
Good point ... - 05/01/2010 07:52:04 PM 663 Views
I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 08:45:52 PM 4408 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 09:23:06 PM 633 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 10:30:42 PM 666 Views
Wasn't there a quote somewhere - 06/01/2010 02:05:32 AM 584 Views
Probably a bit of retconning there by Brandon - 06/01/2010 03:34:55 PM 616 Views
BS is definitely wrong here - 06/01/2010 02:01:23 AM 629 Views
Re: BS is definitely wrong here - 06/01/2010 03:36:06 PM 597 Views
There is another way... - 05/01/2010 07:00:31 PM 656 Views
Re: There is another way... - 05/01/2010 07:35:05 PM 676 Views
Re: There is another way... - 05/01/2010 11:05:26 PM 597 Views
Nope - 06/01/2010 04:36:56 AM 685 Views
USe Occam's Razor yourself... - 06/01/2010 05:53:22 AM 792 Views
and why didn't she invert any of the weaves? - 06/01/2010 05:55:54 AM 619 Views
Exactly! *NM* - 06/01/2010 05:27:52 PM 334 Views
Maybe you cannot invert compulsion? - 06/01/2010 06:56:35 PM 654 Views
so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? seems a little - 06/01/2010 11:31:09 PM 570 Views
Re: so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? - 07/01/2010 12:02:00 AM 513 Views
I am inclined to agree with Datakim here. - 07/01/2010 02:04:42 AM 826 Views
Why aren't inverted weaves standard practice? - 07/01/2010 01:24:09 AM 684 Views
Balefire is so confusing - 05/01/2010 07:03:29 PM 695 Views
Re: Balefire is so confusing - 05/01/2010 08:52:57 PM 657 Views
She's dead as a bloody doornail. Or whatever that saying is... *NM* - 05/01/2010 07:20:36 PM 332 Views
Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 07:29:11 PM 825 Views
Re: Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 08:21:16 PM 699 Views
Re: Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 08:41:15 PM 662 Views
I think... - 05/01/2010 09:05:48 PM 655 Views
No way. - 05/01/2010 07:31:12 PM 705 Views
Re: No way. - 05/01/2010 08:31:54 PM 607 Views
Re: No way. - 05/01/2010 10:16:03 PM 632 Views
Graendal's as dead as BS/RJ makes her. *NM* - 06/01/2010 02:40:46 AM 312 Views
She's dead as dead gets. - 06/01/2010 01:43:34 AM 583 Views
Dead is my bet - 06/01/2010 11:48:46 AM 597 Views
She's dead *NM* - 06/01/2010 11:58:34 AM 307 Views
Dead. *NM* - 06/01/2010 03:58:19 PM 311 Views
I think she's alive. - 06/01/2010 06:12:50 PM 619 Views
Compulsion is rather useless isn't it? - 06/01/2010 07:44:42 PM 698 Views
It may take an exceptional Delver/Healer - 06/01/2010 08:49:37 PM 669 Views
What if.. - 06/01/2010 10:41:44 PM 570 Views
I'll roll my eyes, and snort if she's alive - 08/01/2010 04:21:20 AM 594 Views
Well... - 10/01/2010 03:24:39 AM 781 Views

Reply to Message