1) Objects don't have threads in the Pattern, so destroying the angreal doesn't undo anything, it just destroys the angreal.
This seems to be a bone of contention. See Datakim's post above, for evidence to the contrary.
2) Why would Graendal ever take it off? It's a ring, she can wear it 24/10, and I would be very surprised if she didn't.
That's a good point. If it were a bulky statue or something, you could see her putting it down. But a ring, in a situation where she would presumably have been more cautious/alert than normal? It does seem unlikely.
Graendal is dead. I actually didn't get a huge letdown over her death. I can't really think of any other way for Rand to get rid of her. She was smarter than him, and she was never going to stand and fight him. He beat her.
I don't have a problem with Graendal's death in this manner, either. I was just trying to think of a plausible way she may still be alive. But, all the feedback I'm getting is making me think that my "plausible" way is not so "plausible" after all.
Rise and fall, turn the Wheel,
'cause all life is
is really just a circle.
-BHT&tM
'cause all life is
is really just a circle.
-BHT&tM
Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?)
- 05/01/2010 05:44:12 PM
2543 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?)
- 05/01/2010 06:46:19 PM
1291 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?)
- 05/01/2010 07:15:41 PM
1144 Views
Nynaeve's boat...
- 05/01/2010 07:23:57 PM
1123 Views
Good point ...
- 05/01/2010 07:52:04 PM
966 Views
I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads.
- 05/01/2010 08:45:52 PM
4697 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads.
- 05/01/2010 09:23:06 PM
948 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads.
- 05/01/2010 10:30:42 PM
999 Views
There is another way...
- 05/01/2010 07:00:31 PM
976 Views
Nope
- 06/01/2010 04:36:56 AM
986 Views
USe Occam's Razor yourself...
- 06/01/2010 05:53:22 AM
1109 Views
and why didn't she invert any of the weaves?
- 06/01/2010 05:55:54 AM
932 Views
Maybe you cannot invert compulsion?
- 06/01/2010 06:56:35 PM
939 Views
so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? seems a little
- 06/01/2010 11:31:09 PM
868 Views
Re: so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted?
- 07/01/2010 12:02:00 AM
832 Views
She's dead as a bloody doornail. Or whatever that saying is... *NM*
- 05/01/2010 07:20:36 PM
493 Views
Clearly dead
- 05/01/2010 07:29:11 PM
1141 Views
I think she's alive.
- 06/01/2010 06:12:50 PM
920 Views
Compulsion is rather useless isn't it?
- 06/01/2010 07:44:42 PM
1020 Views
It may take an exceptional Delver/Healer
- 06/01/2010 08:49:37 PM
973 Views
perhaps, but still I have a hard time believing Graendal didn't invert the weaves!
- 06/01/2010 11:06:49 PM
901 Views
Re: perhaps, but still I have a hard time believing Graendal didn't invert the weaves!
- 07/01/2010 03:42:17 PM
954 Views
