She was always very lightly Forkrooted. She never had enough to lose consciousness. Moghedien did.
What's more important is that Egwene was dosed to the point where she could barely channel a trickle to the point where she couldn't duplicate her earlier feat in the classroom. The fact of the matter is we readers have very little idea what the words 'heavily dosed' and 'lightly dosed' mean in this context - we don't have examples of exactly how many cups are needed to impede channeling ability, how close this dose is to the amount needed to make you drowsy (which is where Egwene was at many points during the latter part of her captivity) and the dose needed to completely knock you out. I've discussed this point before but it seems that forkroot has nothing at all to do with channeling ability or your ability to access your Talents and everything to do with your ability to concentrate to the extent needed to move, think and by extension use the Power or a weapon. So even though her consciousness and physiology was affected, she could still Dream.
What does Egwene have to do with this? I'm asking you why Moghedien didn't try using TAR to engineer an escape when she had an a'dam on her.
Not sure. Perhaps some limitation. I just brought Egwene up because she illustrates the point that being forkrooted doesn't interfere with Dreaming ability. For all we know being forkrooted heavy enough to fall unconscious might leave you stuck in the Dreamworld if you manage to get there, which might account for why Moghedien couldn't escape - her physical body was incapacitated.
That makes little or no sense. Behavior is all very well, but physical impossibility trumps such considerations. There's a 0% chance for Moggy to have killed Asmo.
It's a fictional series, so if the author wants to make up some limitation we haven't heard of, he could. Anyway, that makes more sense to me than either Lanfear or Slayer.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
So your name is Graendal....
- 01/02/2010 09:18:00 PM
1922 Views
one of the reasons I'm at a loss with her death ... along with the lead-up being clumsy *NM*
- 01/02/2010 09:36:29 PM
817 Views
She very well...
- 01/02/2010 11:13:50 PM
1218 Views
Ha! "Graendal actually kills Asmodean". A very bold claim.
*NM*
- 02/02/2010 10:51:40 AM
718 Views
*NM*
- 02/02/2010 10:51:40 AM
718 Views
Bold like saying that water is wet....
- 02/02/2010 05:46:54 PM
835 Views
I am now split with a 80% belief it's Graendal and 20% that it's Moghedien *NM*
- 02/02/2010 06:11:47 PM
488 Views
Moghedien....
- 02/02/2010 06:15:41 PM
973 Views
The a'dam doesn't limit your ability to enter T'A'R
- 02/02/2010 06:36:26 PM
970 Views
Yeah.....
- 02/02/2010 06:46:50 PM
1128 Views
Re: Yeah.....
- 02/02/2010 07:42:59 PM
873 Views
Moghedien? Really?
- 02/02/2010 07:56:33 PM
980 Views
Re: Moghedien? Really?
- 02/02/2010 09:03:54 PM
1004 Views
Egwene was faintly forkrooted, not heavily.
- 02/02/2010 10:24:55 PM
889 Views
It was heavy enough to nullify her ability almost completely by TGS
- 02/02/2010 10:38:04 PM
855 Views
Re: Moghedien? Really?
- 03/02/2010 01:02:13 AM
871 Views
Re: Moghedien? Really?
- 03/02/2010 03:31:21 PM
1092 Views
The lead up was clumsy because her death scene was rather forced.
- 09/02/2010 11:11:21 PM
1059 Views
Couple of flaws in that reasoning
- 02/02/2010 07:56:35 AM
1255 Views
Come on now....
- 02/02/2010 04:58:34 PM
1153 Views
IMO
- 02/02/2010 05:58:10 PM
950 Views
This could go either way....
- 02/02/2010 06:14:21 PM
1080 Views
RE: Strength and Compulsion
- 02/02/2010 06:31:13 PM
1083 Views
I never figured that Verin was weak....or even middling.
- 02/02/2010 06:57:11 PM
958 Views
Re: I never figured that Verin was weak....or even middling.
- 02/02/2010 07:51:15 PM
984 Views
The thing is...
- 02/02/2010 09:39:18 AM
963 Views
My name is Graendal? My parents will be so confused.
- 02/02/2010 02:19:26 PM
897 Views
A conclusion with an explanation built around it.
- 02/02/2010 10:22:29 PM
987 Views
So...like the theory of Macro Evolution? People seem to believe that.....
- 02/02/2010 11:22:41 PM
1040 Views
...
- 03/02/2010 01:23:06 AM
908 Views
Ok...I'm just saying...
- 03/02/2010 04:00:46 PM
1061 Views
I don't mean to make any generalisations about you, and I'm sorry if that's what I sounded like.
- 04/02/2010 12:24:34 AM
888 Views
That's ridiculous
- 02/02/2010 11:39:41 PM
929 Views
Hold on now....
- 02/02/2010 11:51:32 PM
1093 Views
Re: Hold on now....
- 03/02/2010 02:52:07 AM
908 Views
Your theory breaks down because of something Brandon said.
- 03/02/2010 03:49:58 AM
840 Views
I disagree.
- 03/02/2010 05:31:39 AM
802 Views
But how many previously unseen weaves have had such huge implications?
- 03/02/2010 01:29:15 PM
1102 Views
Two things come to mind...
- 03/02/2010 03:50:38 PM
1010 Views
I don't really think this is relevant
- 03/02/2010 05:03:51 PM
932 Views
There's a difference....
- 03/02/2010 06:01:30 PM
997 Views
I know there is. You're the one who brought up the weaves being picked apart
- 03/02/2010 06:37:40 PM
955 Views
- 03/02/2010 06:37:40 PM
955 Views
*grins*
- 03/02/2010 06:42:54 PM
979 Views
But again...
- 03/02/2010 06:59:18 PM
884 Views
sure we do
- 03/02/2010 07:03:40 PM
849 Views
Each of them was at the very least confused/disoriented afterwards.
- 03/02/2010 07:14:24 PM
837 Views
But here's the thing...
- 03/02/2010 07:36:42 PM
952 Views
Re: Each of them was at the very least confused/disoriented afterwards.
- 03/02/2010 07:37:58 PM
830 Views
...
- 03/02/2010 07:42:07 PM
884 Views
Re: ...
- 03/02/2010 07:59:26 PM
870 Views
But
- 03/02/2010 08:04:27 PM
994 Views
I think it would be obvious if Ituralde was acting different
- 03/02/2010 08:18:50 PM
1143 Views
Hrm
- 03/02/2010 08:36:12 PM
1073 Views

*NM*
*NM*