She was always very lightly Forkrooted. She never had enough to lose consciousness. Moghedien did.
What's more important is that Egwene was dosed to the point where she could barely channel a trickle to the point where she couldn't duplicate her earlier feat in the classroom. The fact of the matter is we readers have very little idea what the words 'heavily dosed' and 'lightly dosed' mean in this context - we don't have examples of exactly how many cups are needed to impede channeling ability, how close this dose is to the amount needed to make you drowsy (which is where Egwene was at many points during the latter part of her captivity) and the dose needed to completely knock you out. I've discussed this point before but it seems that forkroot has nothing at all to do with channeling ability or your ability to access your Talents and everything to do with your ability to concentrate to the extent needed to move, think and by extension use the Power or a weapon. So even though her consciousness and physiology was affected, she could still Dream.
What does Egwene have to do with this? I'm asking you why Moghedien didn't try using TAR to engineer an escape when she had an a'dam on her.
Not sure. Perhaps some limitation. I just brought Egwene up because she illustrates the point that being forkrooted doesn't interfere with Dreaming ability. For all we know being forkrooted heavy enough to fall unconscious might leave you stuck in the Dreamworld if you manage to get there, which might account for why Moghedien couldn't escape - her physical body was incapacitated.
That makes little or no sense. Behavior is all very well, but physical impossibility trumps such considerations. There's a 0% chance for Moggy to have killed Asmo.
It's a fictional series, so if the author wants to make up some limitation we haven't heard of, he could. Anyway, that makes more sense to me than either Lanfear or Slayer.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
So your name is Graendal....
- 01/02/2010 09:18:00 PM
1837 Views
one of the reasons I'm at a loss with her death ... along with the lead-up being clumsy *NM*
- 01/02/2010 09:36:29 PM
786 Views
She very well...
- 01/02/2010 11:13:50 PM
1136 Views
Ha! "Graendal actually kills Asmodean". A very bold claim.
*NM*
- 02/02/2010 10:51:40 AM
682 Views
*NM*
- 02/02/2010 10:51:40 AM
682 Views
Bold like saying that water is wet....
- 02/02/2010 05:46:54 PM
768 Views
I am now split with a 80% belief it's Graendal and 20% that it's Moghedien *NM*
- 02/02/2010 06:11:47 PM
465 Views
Moghedien....
- 02/02/2010 06:15:41 PM
880 Views
The a'dam doesn't limit your ability to enter T'A'R
- 02/02/2010 06:36:26 PM
893 Views
Yeah.....
- 02/02/2010 06:46:50 PM
1032 Views
Re: Yeah.....
- 02/02/2010 07:42:59 PM
806 Views
Moghedien? Really?
- 02/02/2010 07:56:33 PM
894 Views
Re: Moghedien? Really?
- 02/02/2010 09:03:54 PM
854 Views
Egwene was faintly forkrooted, not heavily.
- 02/02/2010 10:24:55 PM
820 Views
It was heavy enough to nullify her ability almost completely by TGS
- 02/02/2010 10:38:04 PM
766 Views
Re: Moghedien? Really?
- 03/02/2010 01:02:13 AM
802 Views
Re: Moghedien? Really?
- 03/02/2010 03:31:21 PM
1009 Views
The lead up was clumsy because her death scene was rather forced.
- 09/02/2010 11:11:21 PM
968 Views
Couple of flaws in that reasoning
- 02/02/2010 07:56:35 AM
1169 Views
Come on now....
- 02/02/2010 04:58:34 PM
1054 Views
IMO
- 02/02/2010 05:58:10 PM
866 Views
This could go either way....
- 02/02/2010 06:14:21 PM
1009 Views
RE: Strength and Compulsion
- 02/02/2010 06:31:13 PM
1010 Views
I never figured that Verin was weak....or even middling.
- 02/02/2010 06:57:11 PM
884 Views
Re: I never figured that Verin was weak....or even middling.
- 02/02/2010 07:51:15 PM
910 Views
The thing is...
- 02/02/2010 09:39:18 AM
882 Views
My name is Graendal? My parents will be so confused.
- 02/02/2010 02:19:26 PM
834 Views
A conclusion with an explanation built around it.
- 02/02/2010 10:22:29 PM
919 Views
So...like the theory of Macro Evolution? People seem to believe that.....
- 02/02/2010 11:22:41 PM
933 Views
...
- 03/02/2010 01:23:06 AM
829 Views
Ok...I'm just saying...
- 03/02/2010 04:00:46 PM
986 Views
I don't mean to make any generalisations about you, and I'm sorry if that's what I sounded like.
- 04/02/2010 12:24:34 AM
826 Views
That's ridiculous
- 02/02/2010 11:39:41 PM
853 Views
Hold on now....
- 02/02/2010 11:51:32 PM
1010 Views
Re: Hold on now....
- 03/02/2010 02:52:07 AM
841 Views
Your theory breaks down because of something Brandon said.
- 03/02/2010 03:49:58 AM
775 Views
I disagree.
- 03/02/2010 05:31:39 AM
739 Views
But how many previously unseen weaves have had such huge implications?
- 03/02/2010 01:29:15 PM
1028 Views
Two things come to mind...
- 03/02/2010 03:50:38 PM
933 Views
I don't really think this is relevant
- 03/02/2010 05:03:51 PM
849 Views
There's a difference....
- 03/02/2010 06:01:30 PM
891 Views
I know there is. You're the one who brought up the weaves being picked apart
- 03/02/2010 06:37:40 PM
881 Views
- 03/02/2010 06:37:40 PM
881 Views
*grins*
- 03/02/2010 06:42:54 PM
896 Views
But again...
- 03/02/2010 06:59:18 PM
806 Views
sure we do
- 03/02/2010 07:03:40 PM
764 Views
Each of them was at the very least confused/disoriented afterwards.
- 03/02/2010 07:14:24 PM
756 Views
But here's the thing...
- 03/02/2010 07:36:42 PM
866 Views
Re: Each of them was at the very least confused/disoriented afterwards.
- 03/02/2010 07:37:58 PM
759 Views
...
- 03/02/2010 07:42:07 PM
819 Views
Re: ...
- 03/02/2010 07:59:26 PM
797 Views
But
- 03/02/2010 08:04:27 PM
900 Views
I think it would be obvious if Ituralde was acting different
- 03/02/2010 08:18:50 PM
1051 Views
Hrm
- 03/02/2010 08:36:12 PM
961 Views

*NM*
*NM*