You should consider and address all of RJ's criteria:
IO -- RJ explained what he meant--as per RJ, IO is based upon considering where everyone was, what they were thinking, what they were doing. Emphasis was on where everyone was.
Opportunity--RJ emphasized OPPORTUNITY provided/caused by the TIMING of events. he emphasized this over motive.
How he died AND where he died- Not one or the other, both factors.
Popular ideas between 1998 and 2005 were wrong. This throws out the most widely accepted ideas and suspects. Between 2003 and 2005 only one website got it right and with the correct reasoning; and the site also provided a comprehensive list and analysis.
I'm worried that i missed some of RJ's criteria. Anybody have any more?
i like the way you think so i'd like to see you address each of the above.
Here is the link to find the quotes for the above http://docs.google.com/View?docID=dcjspjqg_820f85qwbd6&revision=_latest
IO -- RJ explained what he meant--as per RJ, IO is based upon considering where everyone was, what they were thinking, what they were doing. Emphasis was on where everyone was.
Opportunity--RJ emphasized OPPORTUNITY provided/caused by the TIMING of events. he emphasized this over motive.
How he died AND where he died- Not one or the other, both factors.
Popular ideas between 1998 and 2005 were wrong. This throws out the most widely accepted ideas and suspects. Between 2003 and 2005 only one website got it right and with the correct reasoning; and the site also provided a comprehensive list and analysis.
I'm worried that i missed some of RJ's criteria. Anybody have any more?
i like the way you think so i'd like to see you address each of the above.
Here is the link to find the quotes for the above http://docs.google.com/View?docID=dcjspjqg_820f85qwbd6&revision=_latest
This message last edited by saidarisnowtainted on 31/03/2010 at 12:12:20 AM
Intuitively obvious, my dear Watson
- 22/03/2010 01:53:54 AM
1950 Views
The best explanation for the "intuitively obvious"-comment is...
- 22/03/2010 09:41:32 AM
773 Views
So again...how would Slayer know he was in the hallway?
- 22/03/2010 03:18:51 PM
861 Views
I think Slayer spied on Asmo
- 22/03/2010 03:45:20 PM
609 Views
I agree. Slayer is the most intuitively obvious candidate. *NM*
- 22/03/2010 06:29:07 PM
292 Views
Slayer....the book4 minor villian? *NM*
- 22/03/2010 06:34:52 PM
537 Views
Slayer actually was a major villian in TSR.
- 23/03/2010 09:11:39 AM
582 Views
Re: Slayer actually was a major villian in TSR.
- 28/03/2010 07:16:59 PM
631 Views
In my view, Graendal might have sent Slayer, which would explain her knowledge. *NM*
- 29/03/2010 09:45:14 AM
634 Views
As far as I'm concerned...
- 25/03/2010 06:42:53 AM
604 Views
The problem is that people don't read the books or at least ignore what is said about Slayer...
- 25/03/2010 09:41:09 AM
610 Views
Correction...
- 25/03/2010 05:22:46 PM
544 Views
So, basically...
- 25/03/2010 05:50:42 PM
575 Views
The clues are there?
- 25/03/2010 06:29:16 PM
586 Views
Re: The clues are there?
- 26/03/2010 12:51:43 AM
589 Views
He wasn't being insulting, I don't think.
- 26/03/2010 02:16:26 AM
643 Views
well, RJ was a nuclear engineer. 'Nuff said about obviousness, huh?
- 26/03/2010 04:38:00 AM
664 Views
Apparently...
- 26/03/2010 08:58:32 AM
613 Views
No it isn't.
- 26/03/2010 05:43:02 PM
581 Views
You don't understand...
- 27/03/2010 09:11:35 AM
618 Views
Re: You don't understand...
- 27/03/2010 05:23:35 PM
607 Views
Both merged into one being
- 29/03/2010 09:43:47 AM
629 Views
Not what I asked.
- 29/03/2010 06:10:42 PM
564 Views
If he couldn't do this...
- 29/03/2010 06:59:16 PM
594 Views
Re: If he couldn't do this...
- 29/03/2010 07:46:39 PM
572 Views
That Basel Gill comparison just silly...
- 29/03/2010 08:49:19 PM
617 Views
I've asked you only one question, repeatedly.
- 30/03/2010 12:34:44 AM
638 Views
Yeah, and I repeatedly tried to show you the clues...
- 30/03/2010 09:17:59 AM
568 Views
You have never provided anything even resembling evidence.
- 30/03/2010 08:20:54 PM
540 Views
Dude
- 30/03/2010 09:49:05 PM
523 Views
You know what's really embarrassing?
- 30/03/2010 10:28:38 PM
671 Views
One last time...
- 31/03/2010 09:18:01 AM
584 Views
Egwene did it though
- 09/04/2010 02:26:10 AM
570 Views
Not before Lord of Chaos she didn't.
- 09/04/2010 08:03:12 AM
574 Views
Rand does it in the end of TFoH, though, shortly before Asmo's death. *NM*
- 09/04/2010 08:34:23 AM
288 Views
But we don't actually see that
- 09/04/2010 12:23:37 PM
572 Views
But why would he return to his starting point, makes no sense.
- 09/04/2010 12:44:21 PM
642 Views
by your argument Rand should have re-entered the waking world outside to join that battle
- 09/04/2010 07:58:26 PM
595 Views
A question on balefire/2 servants
- 24/03/2010 04:31:49 PM
559 Views
Re: A question on balefire/2 servants
- 24/03/2010 05:03:32 PM
580 Views
First rule of balefire:
- 25/03/2010 06:44:17 AM
540 Views
Re: First rule of balefire: Whatever RJ wants to undo from it is what BF does!
- 28/03/2010 06:59:04 PM
536 Views
On the servants theory
- 25/03/2010 11:33:08 AM
535 Views
Rand's odd wounds
- 29/03/2010 02:48:58 AM
519 Views
RJ said that special properties of TAR was responsible for the wounds.
- 29/03/2010 09:47:01 AM
538 Views
Who says the Dark One couldn't bring Asmodean back? Why would he want to?
- 25/03/2010 05:50:55 AM
627 Views
RJ said that. *NM*
- 25/03/2010 09:31:32 AM
512 Views
You dont address all the criteria
- 30/03/2010 11:27:58 PM
544 Views
@Fanatic-Templar: Proof Slayer can't travel through T'A'R...
- 31/03/2010 03:54:19 AM
548 Views
Maybe none of it matters anyway, Slayer will go down like a punk and I know how it goes
- 31/03/2010 05:56:46 AM
589 Views
Re: Maybe none of it matters anyway, Slayer will go down like a punk and I know how it goes
- 31/03/2010 03:52:16 PM
584 Views


*NM*
*NM*