Active Users:136 Time:30/01/2023 06:18:36 PM
I agree with your point about reading Shakespeare from textbooks. Tom Send a noteboard - 21/02/2012 03:18:37 AM
However, part of your argument regarding literature is deconstructivist in nature. No real judgments can be made because everything is subjective. That's essentially the argument of moral relativism.

I can agree with much of what you wrote, but this part:

I don't understand why there are "novels", at which people tend to turn up their nose, and "Literature", over which people tend to fawn regardless of content. Why are there not simply stories, some better than others, the best of them powerful, engaging works?


I think is ignoring intense debates that people have about the value of particular works. For example, Joyce is often brought up as a writer who is considered a "classic" by some, but crap by others. The borders between literature and popular fiction are sometimes blurred, and the whole point about classification is sometimes an attempt at determining worth and value. Is Ray Bradbury literature? Those are valid questions because essentially by asking the question, someone is asking, "Does this book have worth that will last for generations and be read for its aesthetic or stylistic value, or for what it tells us about the human condition?"

For me, reading Sanderson is just entertainment, while reading Thomas Mann is about so much more. People don't need to "turn their noses up" at novels, but on the other hand, compare literature to art. There is a reason why people reproduce, say, the Mona Lisa and Monet's paintings, while other painters have fallen into obscurity - because certain artists and works are considered to be superior.

Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Brandon Sanderson plans 36 books in his 'Cosmere' setting - 19/02/2012 11:45:24 AM 4484 Views
Was Sanderson created by the Writng Gods to counter balance GRRM? - 19/02/2012 05:13:07 PM 1269 Views
A modern Moorcock, eh ? *NM* - 19/02/2012 05:39:00 PM 557 Views
I just wish he'd be done with the RJ shit and go back to writing his own books. - 19/02/2012 05:40:59 PM 1220 Views
Agreed on both points..... - 19/02/2012 08:00:41 PM 1179 Views
Well, but he is a "fluff" writer from a literary standpoint - 20/02/2012 02:16:11 AM 1234 Views
Not a fluff writer in my mind..... - 20/02/2012 03:12:46 AM 1184 Views
You don't seem to want to hear what I'm saying - 20/02/2012 03:51:13 AM 1146 Views
And I am saying that storytelling is more important..... - 20/02/2012 04:52:39 AM 1270 Views
Storytelling is crucial... - 20/02/2012 05:59:57 AM 1244 Views
A few comments/replies about your post..... - 20/02/2012 02:57:16 PM 1207 Views
You are correct in one respect: all of this is opinion. - 20/02/2012 07:01:11 PM 1183 Views
You sound like one of those nasty "literary elites"! - 20/02/2012 08:07:13 PM 1128 Views
Literature is subjective - 21/02/2012 12:26:35 AM 1225 Views
Very well said..... *NM* - 21/02/2012 01:12:40 AM 516 Views
I agree with your point about reading Shakespeare from textbooks. - 21/02/2012 03:18:37 AM 1267 Views
Never heard of Thomas Mann and the real Mona Lisa..... - 21/02/2012 03:34:12 AM 1103 Views
Conversely, why should I trust the likes of you? - 21/02/2012 06:19:18 AM 1344 Views
Oh, come now... - 21/02/2012 10:35:18 AM 1261 Views
When it comes to evaluating schema, I'm not going to trust someone who only had English 101 - 21/02/2012 11:26:03 AM 1066 Views
Mostly agreed - 21/02/2012 09:00:51 PM 1154 Views
Mostly true - 21/02/2012 09:27:09 PM 1188 Views
Re: Mostly true - 22/02/2012 12:58:55 AM 1011 Views
Larry = snob - 21/02/2012 05:34:22 PM 1126 Views
Amusing - 21/02/2012 07:49:20 PM 1112 Views
Wow, you lack basic reading comprehension skills..... - 21/02/2012 08:29:24 PM 1101 Views
Uh...Faust is a play. Doctor Faustus is a novel. The former is Goethe, the latter is Mann. *NM* - 22/02/2012 12:00:22 AM 552 Views
D'uh.....notice the smiley face. Good grief! *NM* - 22/02/2012 12:50:23 AM 550 Views
Just checking... *NM* - 22/02/2012 01:07:40 AM 504 Views
Wait, let's look at the gross disconnect between two statements. - 21/02/2012 01:59:34 PM 1241 Views
I have not blindly rejected the literary elites..... - 21/02/2012 05:27:35 PM 1209 Views
So true about the Mona Lisa. - 21/02/2012 07:57:41 PM 1266 Views
Yes, I was at the Louvre and you are right..... - 21/02/2012 08:32:40 PM 1126 Views
This is where your own rethoric defeats you... - 23/02/2012 06:38:54 AM 1108 Views
There's "subjective", and there's "lack of education" - 21/02/2012 08:58:11 PM 1146 Views
Re: There's "subjective", and there's "lack of education" - 21/02/2012 09:23:38 PM 1295 Views
Thank you. That was excellent. *NM* - 20/02/2012 07:01:31 PM 583 Views
Seems like an awful lot. - 19/02/2012 08:11:22 PM 1351 Views
Sanderson is a machine. Also, the books (so far) have been wildly different - 20/02/2012 12:50:41 AM 1262 Views
I thought he was just recycling the name at first. *NM* - 20/02/2012 02:09:57 AM 563 Views
It's likely to stay that way... - 20/02/2012 06:22:50 AM 1269 Views
I think he can actually do both - 20/02/2012 03:31:00 PM 1301 Views
Re: I think he can actually do both - 20/02/2012 06:34:30 PM 1338 Views
I love it. - 19/02/2012 10:00:28 PM 1101 Views
Confirmation on the Mistborn trilogies. I am so happy. *NM* - 20/02/2012 05:38:23 AM 504 Views
I am thrilled to see that there will be more stories about Wax and Wayne..... - 20/02/2012 03:46:37 PM 1019 Views
The one issue I had with that book... - 21/02/2012 06:21:29 PM 1117 Views
Waxillium! *NM* - 21/02/2012 10:47:03 PM 485 Views
WAXILLIUM! *NM* - 04/03/2012 07:39:37 AM 650 Views
Why is that an issue? I think those names are great. - 23/02/2012 05:31:51 AM 1023 Views
Do you not like puns? *NM* - 06/03/2012 01:38:31 PM 548 Views
BS- The Fantasy Stephen King? - 21/12/2012 08:12:21 PM 919 Views

Reply to Message