Active Users:108 Time:29/11/2022 03:38:36 AM
When it comes to evaluating schema, I'm not going to trust someone who only had English 101 Larry Send a noteboard - 21/02/2012 11:26:03 AM

By "you," referencing the attitudes of those who dismiss out of hand authors who have earned some sort of cultural cachet in favor of what? Would I trust a non-expert to fix my car? To diagnose a medical condition? To do my taxes?

Of course not. Then why would I want to trust a non-expert when it comes to evaluating things such as music, literature, and cinema? I've learned something of the first and last through observation, but I've also discovered that there's a ton of people with shit tastes.

If you've never read The Magic Mountain or Doctor Faustus and want to praise Brandon Sanderson of all people for what he writes, there truly is no accounting for taste.

I agree with the crux of your point, but how the hell can you compare a literary/art critic with a mechanic, accountant or a doctor? No art critic can make definitive, objective, true-in-all-contexts statements about what is "good" and what is not.

I suspect you're purposely missing the point. A literary expert is going to be aware of how texts can be evaluated and s/he is going to be much more well-read than the typical "I read only Dan Brown and his ilk" reader of less than five books a year. Someone who is not well-read is worthless to me when I'm looking for an educated opinion on particular books. Who would you trust to know something about Nazi era religious history: me, whose graduate research delved directly into that topic, with literature read in multiple languages, or the homeless guy living under the bridge who dropped out of high school?

If you honestly say the other guy, I'll never listen to a word you say again ;)

You can trust a doctor to fix your body and not a random guy because there is definite knowledge a doctor has is real.

If you "trust" an art critic to tell you what is good, then you're hopeless. The best a critic can do is explain his personal reaction to any work in terms that can help you choose. The best of them will compare with other relevant works, explore the context of the work, etc., and the worst will simply use a points or star system. Either way, you read multiple reviews, compare the critics view with your own, and "trust" him or not on the basis of how much your tastes match. Hardly a scientific process.

The only concession I'll make is that there can be different weighting to certain things. No expert worth her/his salt is going to evaluate a work that works only on a single level higher than a work that works highly on multiple levels. Now if you can find someone who is well-versed in Anglo-American literature (or any national literature) who would place greater value on say a Piers Anthony novel than a Doestoevsky, Mann, James, Joyce, Woolf, etc., then I might be shocked for one of the few times in my life.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis m├ęchant.
Reply to message
Brandon Sanderson plans 36 books in his 'Cosmere' setting - 19/02/2012 11:45:24 AM 4471 Views
Was Sanderson created by the Writng Gods to counter balance GRRM? - 19/02/2012 05:13:07 PM 1255 Views
A modern Moorcock, eh ? *NM* - 19/02/2012 05:39:00 PM 549 Views
I just wish he'd be done with the RJ shit and go back to writing his own books. - 19/02/2012 05:40:59 PM 1207 Views
Agreed on both points..... - 19/02/2012 08:00:41 PM 1165 Views
Well, but he is a "fluff" writer from a literary standpoint - 20/02/2012 02:16:11 AM 1219 Views
Not a fluff writer in my mind..... - 20/02/2012 03:12:46 AM 1169 Views
You don't seem to want to hear what I'm saying - 20/02/2012 03:51:13 AM 1133 Views
And I am saying that storytelling is more important..... - 20/02/2012 04:52:39 AM 1257 Views
Storytelling is crucial... - 20/02/2012 05:59:57 AM 1231 Views
A few comments/replies about your post..... - 20/02/2012 02:57:16 PM 1197 Views
You are correct in one respect: all of this is opinion. - 20/02/2012 07:01:11 PM 1171 Views
You sound like one of those nasty "literary elites"! - 20/02/2012 08:07:13 PM 1116 Views
Literature is subjective - 21/02/2012 12:26:35 AM 1213 Views
Very well said..... *NM* - 21/02/2012 01:12:40 AM 510 Views
I agree with your point about reading Shakespeare from textbooks. - 21/02/2012 03:18:37 AM 1254 Views
Never heard of Thomas Mann and the real Mona Lisa..... - 21/02/2012 03:34:12 AM 1089 Views
Conversely, why should I trust the likes of you? - 21/02/2012 06:19:18 AM 1328 Views
Oh, come now... - 21/02/2012 10:35:18 AM 1246 Views
When it comes to evaluating schema, I'm not going to trust someone who only had English 101 - 21/02/2012 11:26:03 AM 1053 Views
Mostly agreed - 21/02/2012 09:00:51 PM 1141 Views
Mostly true - 21/02/2012 09:27:09 PM 1176 Views
Re: Mostly true - 22/02/2012 12:58:55 AM 1000 Views
Larry = snob - 21/02/2012 05:34:22 PM 1112 Views
Amusing - 21/02/2012 07:49:20 PM 1100 Views
Wow, you lack basic reading comprehension skills..... - 21/02/2012 08:29:24 PM 1086 Views
Uh...Faust is a play. Doctor Faustus is a novel. The former is Goethe, the latter is Mann. *NM* - 22/02/2012 12:00:22 AM 545 Views
D'uh.....notice the smiley face. Good grief! *NM* - 22/02/2012 12:50:23 AM 543 Views
Just checking... *NM* - 22/02/2012 01:07:40 AM 495 Views
Wait, let's look at the gross disconnect between two statements. - 21/02/2012 01:59:34 PM 1226 Views
I have not blindly rejected the literary elites..... - 21/02/2012 05:27:35 PM 1195 Views
So true about the Mona Lisa. - 21/02/2012 07:57:41 PM 1255 Views
Yes, I was at the Louvre and you are right..... - 21/02/2012 08:32:40 PM 1115 Views
This is where your own rethoric defeats you... - 23/02/2012 06:38:54 AM 1095 Views
There's "subjective", and there's "lack of education" - 21/02/2012 08:58:11 PM 1133 Views
Re: There's "subjective", and there's "lack of education" - 21/02/2012 09:23:38 PM 1283 Views
Thank you. That was excellent. *NM* - 20/02/2012 07:01:31 PM 575 Views
Seems like an awful lot. - 19/02/2012 08:11:22 PM 1338 Views
Sanderson is a machine. Also, the books (so far) have been wildly different - 20/02/2012 12:50:41 AM 1250 Views
I thought he was just recycling the name at first. *NM* - 20/02/2012 02:09:57 AM 553 Views
It's likely to stay that way... - 20/02/2012 06:22:50 AM 1257 Views
I think he can actually do both - 20/02/2012 03:31:00 PM 1291 Views
Re: I think he can actually do both - 20/02/2012 06:34:30 PM 1326 Views
I love it. - 19/02/2012 10:00:28 PM 1088 Views
Confirmation on the Mistborn trilogies. I am so happy. *NM* - 20/02/2012 05:38:23 AM 497 Views
I am thrilled to see that there will be more stories about Wax and Wayne..... - 20/02/2012 03:46:37 PM 1004 Views
The one issue I had with that book... - 21/02/2012 06:21:29 PM 1104 Views
Waxillium! *NM* - 21/02/2012 10:47:03 PM 478 Views
WAXILLIUM! *NM* - 04/03/2012 07:39:37 AM 638 Views
Why is that an issue? I think those names are great. - 23/02/2012 05:31:51 AM 1008 Views
Do you not like puns? *NM* - 06/03/2012 01:38:31 PM 533 Views
BS- The Fantasy Stephen King? - 21/12/2012 08:12:21 PM 909 Views

Reply to Message