Active Users:71 Time:03/10/2022 08:51:45 AM
No, I read that and didn't disagree that there couldn't be works that had both (read other comments) Larry Send a noteboard - 21/02/2012 09:23:31 PM
Like I said, why should I trust you? Because you are so darn cute when you defend the "fluff" as being the superior to other types of fiction?


Stupid comment. I said storytelling is the most important aspect of writing and that the truly great novels are the ones that do both - great storytelling and deep meaning/style. I just said that a lot of the "great" novels that elites cite lack good storytelling and therefore should not be given such acclaim.

Silly head.....


Your rhetoric is defeating you. I guess I get to play the role of Katie Couric to your Sarah Palin: What literary critics/"elites" do you specifically disagree with here? You're not answering that question. You're tossing about generalizations that do not show any depth of thought here.

I'm also uncertain about the amount of engagement you did with the texts you did mention, as it wouldn't surprise me if they were largely comprised of books that were assigned reading during the 16-22 age period. Now almost two months into a year-long reading (very few re-reads) and reviewing project where I cover the available William Faulkner stories, what I've learned is that at 37 those stories that I had been assigned to read at 18-19 mean a lot more now and those that I'm discovering for the first time move and entertain at the same time. I've learned how to evaluate prose, to judge how themes are executed, how characters are drawn and depicted, and you know what? I've discovered a greater depth of entertainment there.

Problem is, when I read something like Sanderson's works, I can enjoy it on the plot twist level, think his characterizations and thematic execution are shallow, and not dwell too much upon what I read. I recognize that is precisely the level of engagement works such as his are written, I don't disparage the works (I tend to give them mixed/positive marks), and it happens to be that his prose and characterizations was something that I discussed directly with him over at Westeros over a year before he was tabbed to finish WoT (sadly that thread was lost when several threads were deleted for space purposes about three years ago).

All of this is just a long way of saying that you are making too many generalizations about things and aren't delving further into it.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis méchant.
Reply to message
Brandon Sanderson plans 36 books in his 'Cosmere' setting - 19/02/2012 11:45:24 AM 4457 Views
Was Sanderson created by the Writng Gods to counter balance GRRM? - 19/02/2012 05:13:07 PM 1246 Views
A modern Moorcock, eh ? *NM* - 19/02/2012 05:39:00 PM 540 Views
I just wish he'd be done with the RJ shit and go back to writing his own books. - 19/02/2012 05:40:59 PM 1198 Views
Agreed on both points..... - 19/02/2012 08:00:41 PM 1154 Views
Well, but he is a "fluff" writer from a literary standpoint - 20/02/2012 02:16:11 AM 1207 Views
Not a fluff writer in my mind..... - 20/02/2012 03:12:46 AM 1155 Views
You don't seem to want to hear what I'm saying - 20/02/2012 03:51:13 AM 1118 Views
And I am saying that storytelling is more important..... - 20/02/2012 04:52:39 AM 1245 Views
Storytelling is crucial... - 20/02/2012 05:59:57 AM 1218 Views
A few comments/replies about your post..... - 20/02/2012 02:57:16 PM 1188 Views
You are correct in one respect: all of this is opinion. - 20/02/2012 07:01:11 PM 1158 Views
You sound like one of those nasty "literary elites"! - 20/02/2012 08:07:13 PM 1103 Views
Literature is subjective - 21/02/2012 12:26:35 AM 1203 Views
Very well said..... *NM* - 21/02/2012 01:12:40 AM 501 Views
I agree with your point about reading Shakespeare from textbooks. - 21/02/2012 03:18:37 AM 1241 Views
Never heard of Thomas Mann and the real Mona Lisa..... - 21/02/2012 03:34:12 AM 1079 Views
Conversely, why should I trust the likes of you? - 21/02/2012 06:19:18 AM 1316 Views
Oh, come now... - 21/02/2012 10:35:18 AM 1229 Views
When it comes to evaluating schema, I'm not going to trust someone who only had English 101 - 21/02/2012 11:26:03 AM 1039 Views
Mostly agreed - 21/02/2012 09:00:51 PM 1130 Views
Mostly true - 21/02/2012 09:27:09 PM 1167 Views
Re: Mostly true - 22/02/2012 12:58:55 AM 992 Views
Larry = snob - 21/02/2012 05:34:22 PM 1094 Views
Amusing - 21/02/2012 07:49:20 PM 1089 Views
Wow, you lack basic reading comprehension skills..... - 21/02/2012 08:29:24 PM 1078 Views
No, I read that and didn't disagree that there couldn't be works that had both (read other comments) - 21/02/2012 09:23:31 PM 1201 Views
See I think the word "entertaining" is misleading - 21/02/2012 09:31:59 PM 1112 Views
Uh...Faust is a play. Doctor Faustus is a novel. The former is Goethe, the latter is Mann. *NM* - 22/02/2012 12:00:22 AM 538 Views
D'uh.....notice the smiley face. Good grief! *NM* - 22/02/2012 12:50:23 AM 513 Views
Just checking... *NM* - 22/02/2012 01:07:40 AM 487 Views
Wait, let's look at the gross disconnect between two statements. - 21/02/2012 01:59:34 PM 1214 Views
I have not blindly rejected the literary elites..... - 21/02/2012 05:27:35 PM 1184 Views
So true about the Mona Lisa. - 21/02/2012 07:57:41 PM 1244 Views
Yes, I was at the Louvre and you are right..... - 21/02/2012 08:32:40 PM 1106 Views
This is where your own rethoric defeats you... - 23/02/2012 06:38:54 AM 1089 Views
There's "subjective", and there's "lack of education" - 21/02/2012 08:58:11 PM 1128 Views
Re: There's "subjective", and there's "lack of education" - 21/02/2012 09:23:38 PM 1273 Views
Thank you. That was excellent. *NM* - 20/02/2012 07:01:31 PM 567 Views
Seems like an awful lot. - 19/02/2012 08:11:22 PM 1328 Views
Sanderson is a machine. Also, the books (so far) have been wildly different - 20/02/2012 12:50:41 AM 1238 Views
I thought he was just recycling the name at first. *NM* - 20/02/2012 02:09:57 AM 547 Views
It's likely to stay that way... - 20/02/2012 06:22:50 AM 1241 Views
I think he can actually do both - 20/02/2012 03:31:00 PM 1285 Views
Re: I think he can actually do both - 20/02/2012 06:34:30 PM 1317 Views
I love it. - 19/02/2012 10:00:28 PM 1073 Views
Confirmation on the Mistborn trilogies. I am so happy. *NM* - 20/02/2012 05:38:23 AM 488 Views
I am thrilled to see that there will be more stories about Wax and Wayne..... - 20/02/2012 03:46:37 PM 993 Views
The one issue I had with that book... - 21/02/2012 06:21:29 PM 1089 Views
Waxillium! *NM* - 21/02/2012 10:47:03 PM 474 Views
WAXILLIUM! *NM* - 04/03/2012 07:39:37 AM 620 Views
Why is that an issue? I think those names are great. - 23/02/2012 05:31:51 AM 996 Views
Do you not like puns? *NM* - 06/03/2012 01:38:31 PM 516 Views
BS- The Fantasy Stephen King? - 21/12/2012 08:12:21 PM 891 Views

Reply to Message