Active Users:754 Time:18/08/2026 01:05:32 AM
aha. but. Camilla Send a noteboard - 07/12/2009 03:56:48 PM
If, as Nietzsche says, fiction is better than philosophy because it is honest about lying, surely fantasy or speculative fiction is all the more honest because it does not pretend to be talking about the real world directly?
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
Reply to message
In Support of Other Fiction - 01/12/2009 09:06:14 PM 2485 Views
- 01/12/2009 09:22:56 PM 1558 Views
Re: - 01/12/2009 09:28:04 PM 1552 Views
Wow...we were just Santified *NM* - 03/12/2009 09:16:21 PM 808 Views
Well, let me offer a diverging view on the topic of speculative fiction. - 01/12/2009 09:46:35 PM 1484 Views
I would counter that the stripping away removes a level of reality. - 01/12/2009 10:05:28 PM 1559 Views
That's a Slippery Slope Because You Could Argue On the Same Basis That All Fiction Does That. - 01/12/2009 11:34:34 PM 1626 Views
I don't see the slippery slope, but rather, a confirmation of my original point. - 02/12/2009 01:41:24 AM 1534 Views
perhaps some university will do a study - 03/12/2009 03:55:54 PM 1522 Views
I'd like to see it - 03/12/2009 09:15:12 PM 1542 Views
I'll get to it once I finish my thesis - 03/12/2009 09:56:29 PM 1492 Views
If it looks like crap and smells like crap... - 03/12/2009 10:04:15 PM 1552 Views
I Think I'll Post a Thread on This. - 03/12/2009 06:47:05 PM 1497 Views
I'd like to see it. - 03/12/2009 09:23:07 PM 1586 Views
Regarding depth in Jordan - 03/12/2009 09:31:19 PM 1530 Views
I was thinking about that too - 03/12/2009 10:05:40 PM 1515 Views
Re: I was thinking about that too - 03/12/2009 10:09:26 PM 1587 Views
Destroying the Wheel is meaningless. - 03/12/2009 10:18:08 PM 1456 Views
Re: Destroying the Wheel is meaningless. - 03/12/2009 10:30:15 PM 1529 Views
I Totally Missed That. - 04/12/2009 10:45:56 PM 1608 Views
Re: I Totally Missed That. - 04/12/2009 10:47:59 PM 1539 Views
I Don't Believe It Cursory, But Comparative. - 04/12/2009 11:29:36 PM 1675 Views
Publication bookend Y2K? - 05/12/2009 10:36:01 AM 1549 Views
They're Thick Bookends. - 05/12/2009 06:12:06 PM 1523 Views
I'll Try to Have It Up Tomorrow Early. - 04/12/2009 11:24:18 PM 1597 Views
I like it. - 01/12/2009 10:28:48 PM 1520 Views
Thank you! - 02/12/2009 01:43:05 AM 1650 Views
I find Michel Houellebecq to be one of the most intriguing writers of our time - 01/12/2009 11:14:05 PM 1583 Views
And, in recent memory, Orwell was a first-rate writer. - 02/12/2009 01:44:29 AM 1578 Views
wait! there's somebody "dirtier" than Piers Anthony or Philip Jose Farmer??? - 03/12/2009 04:00:28 PM 1581 Views
PJF is dirty? - 04/12/2009 12:16:12 AM 1437 Views
Nice post. - 02/12/2009 12:03:09 AM 1622 Views
Perhaps you're right. - 02/12/2009 01:47:10 AM 1502 Views
In its entirety? No. - 02/12/2009 02:00:10 PM 1507 Views
I agree! - 02/12/2009 12:17:10 AM 1813 Views
Thank you! - 02/12/2009 01:50:22 AM 1465 Views
I guess I'll break my silence after almost a month and a half... - 02/12/2009 12:23:07 AM 1584 Views
Popcorn? - 02/12/2009 12:31:44 AM 1565 Views
Yes - 02/12/2009 12:39:10 AM 1587 Views
Lovecraft? - 02/12/2009 12:51:55 AM 1569 Views
Re-read what I said - 02/12/2009 12:55:08 AM 1607 Views
aahh - 02/12/2009 09:26:40 AM 1506 Views
Larry, please tell me you weren't... - 03/12/2009 04:33:32 PM 1365 Views
I concur - 02/12/2009 12:27:13 AM 1468 Views
I like your framing of the issue (and Shannara is the Taco Bell of writing). - 02/12/2009 02:03:51 AM 1565 Views
Thank you - 02/12/2009 09:30:42 AM 1482 Views
more like the mom&pop greasy-spoon diner of writing *NM* - 03/12/2009 05:00:21 PM 733 Views
I'm going to put this in my sig, if you don't mind. - 02/12/2009 03:31:13 AM 1527 Views
hehehe - 02/12/2009 09:31:28 AM 1412 Views
Am i the only one who reads books for fun? - 02/12/2009 12:33:52 AM 1579 Views
There isn't necessarily a contradiction - 02/12/2009 12:38:43 AM 1569 Views
I certainly didn't read The Lost Symbol for ANY cultural, intellectual or edifying reason. - 02/12/2009 02:05:45 AM 1508 Views
it didn't come across that way - 03/12/2009 05:15:36 PM 1503 Views
Of course not. Personally, I don't touch anything other than mind candy when I'm in school, - 02/12/2009 03:29:23 AM 1511 Views
one of the things that is important to me in books/shows - 03/12/2009 05:20:29 PM 1412 Views
We agree! - 03/12/2009 08:03:00 PM 1484 Views
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind is a science fiction/fantasy movie. - 02/12/2009 12:54:08 AM 1574 Views
i was gonna point that out. thnks. *NM* - 02/12/2009 01:13:47 AM 686 Views
Reading only speculative literature is limiting and monotonous. - 02/12/2009 02:09:42 AM 1582 Views
I was going to say exactly that about "real" literature: monotonous and limiting. - 02/12/2009 01:57:49 PM 1537 Views
I think his point was that only SF/F wasn't good food. - 02/12/2009 02:15:29 PM 1502 Views
I would not disagree with you if you said that. - 02/12/2009 02:27:08 PM 1434 Views
Most non-speculative fiction is fluff as well though. - 03/12/2009 05:38:32 PM 1433 Views
hear hear!! I agree totally wert-man - 03/12/2009 07:20:09 PM 1512 Views
Which brings us back to my point. - 03/12/2009 08:04:24 PM 1532 Views
Actually, it is a film that does not fit neatly into one category - 02/12/2009 11:16:20 AM 1548 Views
Science Fiction is the most PERTINANT form of fiction in the world today - 02/12/2009 12:57:19 AM 1562 Views
don't get me wrong - 02/12/2009 01:28:08 AM 1523 Views
SF&F and 'real literature' are not mutually exclusive - 02/12/2009 01:19:05 AM 1515 Views
No, they are not - 02/12/2009 02:18:53 AM 1487 Views
This line is a load of bull - 03/12/2009 02:39:53 PM 1623 Views
So why don't we occasionally focus on "real" books that are technically spec fiction? - 02/12/2009 01:25:04 AM 1445 Views
Why must we limit our focus in that way? - 02/12/2009 02:20:11 AM 1474 Views
I don't see it as limiting or forcing. - 02/12/2009 03:16:07 AM 1462 Views
"Elite club" or "elitist clique"? - 02/12/2009 03:52:11 AM 1442 Views
Either way, I want in. *NM* - 02/12/2009 11:33:52 AM 783 Views
Elite club is how we midwestern rednecks refer to Elitist Clique. *chews on a piece of hay* - 02/12/2009 02:52:01 PM 1648 Views
I was born in the Midwest. - 02/12/2009 03:01:36 PM 1471 Views
I know. - 02/12/2009 03:12:05 PM 1477 Views
Green Acres in reverse, eh? - 02/12/2009 03:38:09 PM 1492 Views
lmao - 02/12/2009 06:21:17 PM 1630 Views
*piledrivers you* - 02/12/2009 06:28:02 PM 1434 Views
...! - 02/12/2009 03:17:57 PM 1441 Views
Admit it. You know what I'm talking about. - 02/12/2009 03:29:31 PM 1511 Views
Re: Admit it. You know what I'm talking about. - 02/12/2009 03:31:26 PM 1435 Views
Vermont isn't in the Midwest. - 02/12/2009 03:39:36 PM 1430 Views
Re: Vermont isn't in the Midwest. - 02/12/2009 03:42:47 PM 1462 Views
Huh! I really didn't think of you as being a masochist. - 02/12/2009 01:51:55 AM 1472 Views
Thank you! - 02/12/2009 02:21:00 AM 1348 Views
Shitstorm! - 02/12/2009 03:06:59 AM 1460 Views
Heh heh heh. - 02/12/2009 03:45:40 AM 1471 Views
Read what you like to read. - 02/12/2009 04:18:53 AM 1604 Views
I'll super size you. Fine. *NM* - 02/12/2009 04:32:58 AM 734 Views
Oh noes! I'm getting word-fat! - 02/12/2009 04:59:05 AM 1491 Views
I seem to have struck a nerve. - 02/12/2009 05:20:27 AM 1514 Views
Apparently not the nerve you think, though. - 02/12/2009 06:42:02 AM 1570 Views
Intellectual achievement isn't a static measure. - 02/12/2009 02:13:10 PM 1537 Views
Re: Intellectual achievement isn't a static measure. - 02/12/2009 03:26:59 PM 1513 Views
Agreed. - 02/12/2009 03:30:50 PM 1405 Views
Re: Agreed. - 02/12/2009 03:32:06 PM 1424 Views
Re: Intellectual achievement isn't a static measure. - 02/12/2009 09:40:28 PM 1569 Views
I really did get under your skin - 02/12/2009 09:58:18 PM 1401 Views
- 02/12/2009 10:06:46 PM 1401 Views
Tom as much as you raise some great points, you are being a condescending ass. - 03/12/2009 04:26:27 AM 1474 Views
You're entitled to your opinion. I don't care. - 03/12/2009 04:51:18 AM 1440 Views
I keep replying. It's like a sickness. - 03/12/2009 05:15:28 AM 1467 Views
Your subject line reinforces my opinion. - 03/12/2009 05:31:50 AM 1373 Views
Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room. *NM* - 03/12/2009 07:21:05 AM 729 Views
LOL! - 04/12/2009 12:21:36 AM 1451 Views
See, you just proved my point. - 04/12/2009 12:39:59 AM 1464 Views
Hm. - 02/12/2009 06:58:56 AM 2076 Views
Re-read my exact point. - 02/12/2009 02:18:20 PM 1411 Views
No. Some kind of reading is indeed essential. - 02/12/2009 02:28:22 PM 1553 Views
Somehow I get the feeling that this post hasn't caused quite as much controversy - 02/12/2009 06:53:18 AM 1597 Views
As I see it... - 02/12/2009 11:38:07 AM 1474 Views
Yep. - 02/12/2009 02:18:22 PM 1626 Views
Re: Yep. - 02/12/2009 03:35:38 PM 1488 Views
Euripides was poorly received, initially. - 02/12/2009 03:57:58 PM 1416 Views
Re: Euripides was poorly received, initially. - 02/12/2009 04:00:35 PM 1422 Views
I know. - 02/12/2009 04:18:16 PM 1485 Views
Re: I know. - 02/12/2009 04:23:14 PM 1423 Views
That is why he's so good, in my opinion. - 02/12/2009 06:15:45 PM 1623 Views
All reading of fiction is a diversion by the very nature of the activity. - 02/12/2009 03:43:05 PM 1468 Views
Diversion from direct action, yes. Diversion from reality, no. - 02/12/2009 04:15:48 PM 1433 Views
I maintain that all acts of reading fiction are a diversion from reality/ the realistic - 02/12/2009 05:43:16 PM 1464 Views
It seems a regressive argument to me. - 03/12/2009 01:18:02 AM 1417 Views
You're playing a game. - 03/12/2009 03:40:14 PM 1508 Views
I like your response. *NM* - 03/12/2009 05:37:09 PM 719 Views
I fundamentally agree with much of what you're saying, but there is a distinction. - 03/12/2009 06:44:02 PM 1544 Views
Oh I concur on that distinction. - 04/12/2009 09:06:34 PM 1517 Views
Spec fic is perhaps at it's best in autocracies? - 02/12/2009 04:10:56 PM 1368 Views
Bulgakov - 02/12/2009 04:25:17 PM 1506 Views
I've only read the first chapter of M&M. - 02/12/2009 04:36:09 PM 1460 Views
Re: I've only read the first chapter of M&M. - 02/12/2009 04:40:16 PM 1363 Views
Not the greatest Tolkien scholar, me. - 02/12/2009 05:17:31 PM 1425 Views
Re: Not the greatest Tolkien scholar, me. - 02/12/2009 05:40:16 PM 1465 Views
I suppose. - 02/12/2009 06:26:30 PM 1441 Views
Re: I suppose. - 02/12/2009 07:25:26 PM 1467 Views
Well, I don't hold escapism in such low esteem *NM* - 02/12/2009 07:56:13 PM 735 Views
That is what I mean - 02/12/2009 08:36:02 PM 1404 Views
This was something I was exploring earlier. - 02/12/2009 04:34:41 PM 1561 Views
Funny thing about the hivemind antagonist. - 02/12/2009 05:13:30 PM 1478 Views
I didn't see the zombies reading speculative fiction - 02/12/2009 05:30:26 PM 1546 Views
Oh, they prefer Clive Cussler. - 02/12/2009 06:23:42 PM 1499 Views
i think it comes more down to quality than genre. - 02/12/2009 04:55:20 PM 1477 Views
I disagree with the ultimate conclusion but agree with many of your points. - 02/12/2009 05:43:04 PM 1470 Views
the illiad is a classic - 02/12/2009 06:35:24 PM 1480 Views
There's only one "L" in Iliad - 02/12/2009 08:18:38 PM 1447 Views
Is there a safe answer to that question? *NM* - 02/12/2009 10:33:21 PM 813 Views
Maybe not. *NM* - 03/12/2009 12:59:09 AM 741 Views
It took me a few minutes to agree - 02/12/2009 07:04:59 PM 1455 Views
Well, I'm glad if you got something out of the post! - 02/12/2009 09:13:26 PM 1463 Views
Re: Well, I'm glad if you got something out of the post! - 02/12/2009 09:20:49 PM 1429 Views
I don't know. I've only read about 30 pages so far. *NM* - 02/12/2009 10:05:54 PM 792 Views
Many people have mentioned that there's quite a bit of good sff lit out there and you seem to agree. - 02/12/2009 07:33:42 PM 1539 Views
Hmmm - 02/12/2009 08:40:53 PM 1413 Views
Re: Hmmm - 02/12/2009 10:48:02 PM 1459 Views
The website is called "Read and Find Out". It doesn't specify what we're supposed to read. - 02/12/2009 08:42:19 PM 1529 Views
Anti the idea ? I see no evidence for this. - 02/12/2009 09:50:37 PM 1481 Views
Heh - 02/12/2009 09:56:30 PM 1478 Views
What do you mean ? Almost all the repliers agree with Tom - 03/12/2009 11:01:08 AM 1447 Views
Re: What do you mean ? Almost all the repliers agree with Tom - 03/12/2009 11:10:35 AM 1497 Views
I see. You don't read announcements. - 03/12/2009 11:12:04 AM 1436 Views
No, but it does bill itself as science fiction/fantasy. - 02/12/2009 10:51:41 PM 1640 Views
Yes. - 03/12/2009 12:01:30 AM 1542 Views
I think Rebekah and Camilla put it well. - 02/12/2009 10:05:24 PM 1558 Views
I think they make good points, as I said above. - 02/12/2009 10:56:55 PM 1411 Views
I agree with in principle - 02/12/2009 11:22:19 PM 1393 Views
Certainly. People are free to skip any discussion. - 03/12/2009 01:01:40 AM 1582 Views
I have a few objections. - 03/12/2009 12:24:43 AM 1485 Views
where else should we talk about it? - 03/12/2009 12:37:26 AM 1480 Views
random thoughts stole my subject line - 03/12/2009 01:56:07 AM 1545 Views
I think I could agree with a "comfort food" analogy - 03/12/2009 02:12:01 AM 1497 Views
Re: I think I could agree with a "comfort food" analogy - 03/12/2009 02:38:17 AM 1552 Views
That's it - 03/12/2009 04:02:28 AM 1600 Views
Question: is it really science fiction without one of the following: - 03/12/2009 05:13:21 AM 1486 Views
Certainly - 03/12/2009 06:13:38 AM 1535 Views
technically speaking, fantasy is classed as a sub heading under science fiction. *NM* - 03/12/2009 02:51:12 PM 645 Views
According to whom? *NM* - 03/12/2009 03:55:45 PM 777 Views
Yeah. What she asked! *NM* - 03/12/2009 09:23:55 PM 759 Views
Yes, it is but actually... - 03/12/2009 09:31:44 PM 1456 Views
Eternal Sunshine doesn't have a mad scientist. - 03/12/2009 10:09:01 PM 1397 Views
Really? - 04/12/2009 07:01:42 PM 1469 Views
But Dan Brown rocks da house!!! *NM* - 03/12/2009 02:16:47 AM 753 Views
*pumps fist* Give it up for Dan Brown! *NM* - 03/12/2009 03:58:23 AM 781 Views
That's Dan "booyah" Brown!!! Booyah!!! *NM* - 04/12/2009 02:00:56 AM 758 Views
another thing wrong with your argument - 03/12/2009 03:30:19 PM 1512 Views
Absolutely not. And, as I said before, there's only one "L" in Iliad. - 03/12/2009 06:53:35 PM 1295 Views
sorry about my atrocious spelling (including the one on pertinent) - 03/12/2009 07:14:59 PM 1578 Views
No problem. On the substantive points: - 03/12/2009 08:00:33 PM 1517 Views
more importantly, which I think it being lost in all this, - 03/12/2009 08:05:27 PM 1470 Views
I'm not reading the Iliad again, once was enough - 04/12/2009 12:19:07 PM 1464 Views
Congratulations on the replies count - 03/12/2009 09:30:41 PM 1583 Views
That was a well-thought out response, but I still disagree. - 03/12/2009 10:50:29 PM 1534 Views
Re: That was a well-thought out response, but I still disagree. - 04/12/2009 07:44:56 PM 1558 Views
But the objective truth of a setting can be measured. - 04/12/2009 10:37:10 PM 1458 Views
But does it make any difference in the objective value of the book? - 06/12/2009 09:35:59 AM 1601 Views
YES. - 06/12/2009 03:34:17 PM 1401 Views
NO - 07/12/2009 08:40:33 PM 1509 Views
Re: That was a well-thought out response, but I still disagree. - 04/12/2009 10:25:08 PM 1484 Views
Yes, it is worse with movies. Much worse, in fact. - 04/12/2009 10:33:18 PM 1522 Views
Re: That was a well-thought out response, but I still disagree. - 06/12/2009 09:36:11 AM 1474 Views
Maybe we're different, but I don't care for FX - 06/12/2009 01:37:53 PM 1463 Views
This is not about the personal taste - 07/12/2009 08:50:34 PM 1503 Views
I've obviously missed the show here... - 04/12/2009 12:14:30 AM 1422 Views
I'm not sure that's right. This thing just keeps growing. - 04/12/2009 12:46:24 AM 1529 Views
What, your penis? - 06/12/2009 02:40:09 AM 1474 Views
Don't you know it! - 06/12/2009 03:28:16 PM 1336 Views
You talk the talk, that's for sure. - 07/12/2009 08:14:41 PM 1493 Views
Hate to break it to you... - 07/12/2009 09:54:24 PM 1520 Views
I thought you were gonna tell me... - 08/12/2009 03:07:54 PM 1599 Views
Metaphor versus literalism - 04/12/2009 05:42:03 PM 1520 Views
aha. but. - 07/12/2009 03:56:48 PM 1648 Views
Quoting Nietzsche is really hitting below the belt. - 07/12/2009 09:12:34 PM 1597 Views
It is good I was only paraphrasing, then - 08/12/2009 10:44:14 AM 1476 Views

Reply to Message