Active Users:894 Time:03/08/2025 05:38:17 PM
I was with you till that last sentence. Aemon Send a noteboard - 01/02/2010 08:58:58 PM
E-readers will however not be a big hit until the companies which runs them stop deleting things from them.


Please. That happened one time, with one ebook manufacturer, and they've since apologized and made reparations of some sort. I forget what they did. Refunded maybe? I don't know. And yes, you can blame the apology on public fallout, that's fine (and likely accurate). All in all, though, this was a very isolated incident, and it's a bit silly to blame total ebook popularity on something so tiny, even if you aren't entirely serious. It just was not a big deal.
Reply to message
Amazon Accepts Macmillan’s Demand for Higher E-Book Prices - 01/02/2010 04:21:35 PM 1442 Views
Amazon lost me as a customer over all this *NM* - 01/02/2010 05:52:53 PM 454 Views
Why's that? - 01/02/2010 06:55:35 PM 1051 Views
I sum it up here - 01/02/2010 08:42:02 PM 1349 Views
That's an interesting point. And I have an opposite reaction. - 01/02/2010 08:56:16 PM 864 Views
I like that they are public - I dislike that they affect the public so directly - 01/02/2010 08:59:41 PM 1085 Views
To each his own. I come away with the opposite reaction and like Amazon even more. - 01/02/2010 09:35:10 PM 809 Views
I agree with you. I like what Amazon did. - 02/02/2010 12:45:10 AM 947 Views
I think his complaint is that he feels Amazon is using public opinion to pressure suppliers. - 01/02/2010 09:04:16 PM 802 Views
thats a big part of it - 01/02/2010 09:09:15 PM 1189 Views
It's a good tactic. I would have done the same thing. *NM* - 01/02/2010 09:36:31 PM 423 Views
Is it though - Amazon's stock is way down today. Seems the tactic failed *NM* - 01/02/2010 09:53:06 PM 426 Views
Apple stocks have gone down on days after major announcements too. - 01/02/2010 10:04:04 PM 776 Views
agreed - short term doesn't mean much *NM* - 01/02/2010 10:08:01 PM 419 Views
Still, your overall point stands. - 01/02/2010 11:10:25 PM 791 Views
Macmillan will lose out when people like myself choose to find the book elsewhere. - 01/02/2010 06:46:10 PM 783 Views
How easy is it to find books now? - 01/02/2010 06:53:43 PM 734 Views
Pretty easily, actually. - 01/02/2010 07:07:11 PM 1185 Views
That's excellent. - 01/02/2010 08:19:55 PM 965 Views
Screens are good. - 01/02/2010 08:50:08 PM 991 Views
Two words: Leather cover. - 01/02/2010 08:54:37 PM 853 Views
Unless you like a lot of old books, or have fairly eclectic tastes, you should be all set. - 01/02/2010 07:11:30 PM 1185 Views
If you do like a lot of old books - 01/02/2010 07:16:20 PM 851 Views
Yep, definitely true. I wasn't thinking quite that old, though. - 01/02/2010 07:24:49 PM 936 Views
$12.99 to $14.99 for a fiction ebook is ridiculous. *NM* - 01/02/2010 07:44:20 PM 470 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 01/02/2010 07:46:33 PM 387 Views
Then again, it's half the price of a print version, for essentially the same product / experience. - 01/02/2010 07:50:29 PM 774 Views
That's the thing, it's not. - 01/02/2010 08:24:08 PM 809 Views
Re: That's the thing, it's not. - 01/02/2010 08:55:35 PM 1003 Views
Because, as Aemon says, that's how price discrimination works. - 01/02/2010 11:31:14 PM 762 Views
Not really. I buy new hardcover releases at Borders for around 18 to 20. - 02/02/2010 12:34:08 AM 949 Views
I don't know about that. - 01/02/2010 08:21:05 PM 848 Views
not really, i buy brand new paperbacks for 6.99 *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:21:16 AM 365 Views
Mass markets, yeah. - 02/02/2010 12:19:25 PM 776 Views
That is bananas. - 01/02/2010 07:46:28 PM 795 Views
"Most newly released..." - 01/02/2010 07:55:19 PM 1027 Views
People pay that sort of money for DVd and more for Blue Ray - 01/02/2010 08:00:47 PM 834 Views
Physical copy is rather important in that case, you know... at least to me. - 01/02/2010 08:54:05 PM 960 Views
I was with you till that last sentence. - 01/02/2010 08:58:58 PM 1025 Views
I really don't think it is that different - 01/02/2010 10:01:20 PM 815 Views
If you have issues with eBook pricing, read this link - 01/02/2010 08:46:47 PM 1171 Views
He makes good points... - 01/02/2010 11:37:22 PM 815 Views
I am unimpressed by his arguments. - 02/02/2010 01:06:03 AM 829 Views
Good for MacMillan. I'll cheer on anyone who takes a stab against e-books. - 02/02/2010 04:00:05 AM 892 Views
Whaaa? - 02/02/2010 04:08:50 AM 841 Views
Yes, of course. - 02/02/2010 04:33:13 AM 935 Views
In ten years you'll have an ebook reader. - 02/02/2010 05:34:57 AM 942 Views
I know. That's the problem. *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:56:32 PM 412 Views
The lower prices, the increased profit, or the ecological benefit? *NM* - 02/02/2010 05:17:13 PM 351 Views
The gradual loss of physical books. *NM* - 02/02/2010 05:32:39 PM 362 Views
Mmm. I detect an illogical argument. - 02/02/2010 05:35:14 PM 752 Views
Obviously they won't disappear completely, or even that fast. - 02/02/2010 11:04:47 PM 784 Views
Why not? It'll spur the growth of used book stores. *NM* - 03/02/2010 01:29:56 AM 345 Views
It will increase the number of books available - 02/02/2010 01:55:05 PM 2042 Views
One apt analogy is the widespread use of recording tools like Pro Tools. - 02/02/2010 08:07:22 PM 934 Views
There are already comapnies offering editng services - 02/02/2010 10:30:28 PM 763 Views
Uh, so what you want to dictate is the medium by which people read? You have no right. - 02/02/2010 08:01:09 PM 889 Views
And again let me add that it's not necessarily one or the other. - 02/02/2010 10:09:20 PM 741 Views
That would be awesome. - 02/02/2010 11:02:42 PM 732 Views
Obviously I'm not dictating anything. I'm stating my view. - 02/02/2010 11:01:41 PM 1016 Views
Good Lord! *NM* - 02/02/2010 07:58:03 PM 352 Views

Reply to Message