Active Users:488 Time:31/10/2026 06:28:12 PM
I don't know if I'd call it bad, per se. Legolas Send a noteboard - 10/04/2010 11:37:55 AM

I have only seen the first season. It seemed a bit off at times, but it got quite good once it got bast all the orgasms that seemed to be necessary in the first couple of episodes. Is the second season bad?

I mean, it's not as if the acting is worse or the writing is worse or so. It's just that I found it rather depressing as just about every character did horrible things that made it rather hard to have much sympathy for them anymore, but then one might argue that's the reality of a civil war. Vorenus and Pullo get involved with what you might call the Roman underworld, Octavian obviously makes his grasp for power, wars with Mark Antony and pretty much becomes a tyrant. I wasn't too fond of them changing actors for Octavian, either, though I can see why it was necessary - where the first season only covers a number of years, the second goes from 44 BC all the way to 31, it's absurd enough that everybody else doesn't age but Octavian could hardly remain a short teenager like he was in the first season (though it has the odd effect of suddenly making him seem older than Octavia).

As far as things I enjoyed go, there's more of Cleopatra, more of the delightful James Purefoy as Mark Antony, and Livia and Agrippa are pretty cool - the former as essentially an evil scheming bitch, the latter as a simple man trying to do what is right while getting tangled up in Octavian's and Livia's games.
Reply to message
The greatest King in Fantasy - 09/04/2010 05:18:42 AM 2347 Views
King Arthur. Hands down. - 09/04/2010 06:40:15 AM 1715 Views
I would argue with you. - 09/04/2010 06:54:53 AM 1673 Views
That's the point, though. Arthur's humanity is what makes him so admirable. - 09/04/2010 06:59:07 AM 1717 Views
I have to agree with Dannymac - 09/04/2010 02:04:44 PM 1685 Views
But he's not in a modern fantasy novel. - 09/04/2010 07:37:14 PM 1764 Views
when I read the actual book... - 10/04/2010 12:08:21 AM 1698 Views
I'm going with the most likely historical version of King Arthur - 09/04/2010 06:45:26 PM 1805 Views
My money is still on Aragorn - 09/04/2010 12:47:43 PM 1807 Views
Aragorn is so awesome... - 09/04/2010 02:05:42 PM 1652 Views
Arwen's character is just never fleshed out, though. - 09/04/2010 02:18:30 PM 1624 Views
Re: Arwen's character is just never fleshed out, though. - 09/04/2010 02:49:45 PM 1701 Views
Hm - 09/04/2010 03:23:53 PM 1763 Views
Mostly, yes, but there are a few exceptions - Galadriel, Eowyn, and above all Luthien. - 09/04/2010 03:32:00 PM 1653 Views
Re: Mostly, yes, but there are a few exceptions - Galadriel, Eowyn, and above all Luthien. - 09/04/2010 03:45:37 PM 1932 Views
I can't agree about the goddesses. - 09/04/2010 04:34:15 PM 1753 Views
Re: I can't agree about the goddesses. - 09/04/2010 04:55:34 PM 1653 Views
If Tacitus and Graves were accurate - 09/04/2010 05:09:20 PM 1795 Views
Re: If Tacitus and Graves were accurate - 09/04/2010 05:26:43 PM 1678 Views
I rather liked her depiction in Rome. - 09/04/2010 05:34:37 PM 1737 Views
Re: I rather liked her depiction in Rome. - 09/04/2010 05:45:06 PM 1793 Views
Re: I rather liked her depiction in Rome. - 10/04/2010 11:14:26 AM 1799 Views
I don't know if I'd call it bad, per se. - 10/04/2010 11:37:55 AM 1958 Views
Re: I can't agree about the goddesses. - 09/04/2010 05:02:50 PM 1747 Views
Eh, the other Vala don't do much of anything either. - 09/04/2010 05:31:42 PM 1699 Views
Re: Eh, the other Vala don't do much of anything either. - 09/04/2010 05:44:03 PM 1682 Views
Re: I can't agree about the goddesses. - 09/04/2010 05:06:49 PM 1834 Views
I call bullshit - 09/04/2010 08:09:49 PM 1630 Views
Re: I call bullshit - 09/04/2010 08:31:16 PM 1633 Views
Re: I call bullshit - 10/04/2010 08:04:15 AM 1737 Views
I didn't realize it was fashionable to call Tolkien sexist. - 10/04/2010 05:12:07 PM 1721 Views
Re: I didn't realize it was fashionable to call Tolkien sexist. - 12/04/2010 11:00:23 AM 1625 Views
Exactly. - 13/04/2010 03:08:46 AM 1742 Views
Re: Exactly. - 13/04/2010 08:54:01 AM 1845 Views
I was going to say something similar. - 09/04/2010 03:21:45 PM 1645 Views
Re: Aragorn is so awesome... - 09/04/2010 08:00:25 PM 1612 Views
Re: Aragorn is so awesome... - 09/04/2010 08:37:12 PM 1667 Views
He's good, but then he just doesn't have to face so many things. - 09/04/2010 02:22:04 PM 1956 Views
Doesn't have to face many things? - 09/04/2010 07:59:27 PM 1696 Views
Re: Doesn't have to face many things? - 09/04/2010 08:38:51 PM 1540 Views
Re: Doesn't have to face many things? - 10/04/2010 08:24:33 AM 1731 Views
Re: Doesn't have to face many things? - 10/04/2010 05:08:42 PM 1826 Views
Re: Doesn't have to face many things? - 12/04/2010 10:55:12 AM 1670 Views
He really wasn't a king in majority of the story though - 12/04/2010 05:54:23 PM 1625 Views
I'm sure there are many, but one coming to mind is Prince Josua from Memory, Sorrow and Thorn - 09/04/2010 02:23:57 PM 1651 Views
Oh yeah I liked him a lot *NM* - 09/04/2010 04:09:59 PM 843 Views
Josua Lackhand is a great fantasy King! - 09/04/2010 05:14:39 PM 1730 Views
Arutha was never King. *NM* - 09/04/2010 07:18:30 PM 805 Views
I'm going to go with a tie... - 09/04/2010 04:22:42 PM 1653 Views
Joffrey and the Stag! *NM* - 09/04/2010 09:53:56 PM 803 Views
ROFL *NM* - 09/04/2010 11:39:36 PM 772 Views
Artur Hawkwing - 10/04/2010 03:34:02 AM 1878 Views
??? - 10/04/2010 10:30:13 AM 2289 Views
Simba *NM* - 10/04/2010 08:40:38 AM 896 Views
Manwe - 10/04/2010 10:31:54 AM 2161 Views
Bah. He's hardly a character. *NM* - 12/04/2010 01:07:29 AM 960 Views
Arutha, the Prince of Krondor - 12/04/2010 01:06:14 AM 1724 Views
Westley - 13/04/2010 02:59:36 AM 1706 Views
Leto Atreides II - 13/04/2010 05:07:29 AM 1611 Views
I'll agree with that! *NM* - 13/04/2010 11:33:10 AM 810 Views

Reply to Message