Active Users:701 Time:14/06/2026 11:03:58 AM
Re: Doesn't have to face many things? Camilla Send a noteboard - 12/04/2010 10:55:12 AM
I thought Aragorn's healing hands came from the Elessar stone, which was given to him from Celebrian by agency of Arwen? Therefore, Arwen could have easily had the healing hands =P

What do you base that on?



In most versions, the Elessar was made by Celebrimbor and it was his greatest work aside from the 3 rings. It is supposed to capture the beauty of light filtering through leaves. Galadriel wore it for quite a while before giving it to her daughter, and she did some miraculous things with it if I remember correctly. Regardless, here is some information on the stone:

It was said that it also held unusual properties. Looking through it, the viewer could see an injured or aged thing or person as in the original state of beauty and youth. Also, the wearer's hands could bring healing from injury. In a later version, this power extends over the land as well. In yet other versions, this power over the land lies instead in the Silmaril or in the three Elven Rings. This idea of healing may have been involved when it was said that the hands of the king would be the hands of a healer - the power may have been augmented by or derived from the Elessar.



Hmmm. I had forgotten about that.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
Reply to message
The greatest King in Fantasy - 09/04/2010 05:18:42 AM 2231 Views
King Arthur. Hands down. - 09/04/2010 06:40:15 AM 1627 Views
I would argue with you. - 09/04/2010 06:54:53 AM 1572 Views
That's the point, though. Arthur's humanity is what makes him so admirable. - 09/04/2010 06:59:07 AM 1616 Views
I have to agree with Dannymac - 09/04/2010 02:04:44 PM 1587 Views
But he's not in a modern fantasy novel. - 09/04/2010 07:37:14 PM 1662 Views
when I read the actual book... - 10/04/2010 12:08:21 AM 1608 Views
I'm going with the most likely historical version of King Arthur - 09/04/2010 06:45:26 PM 1668 Views
My money is still on Aragorn - 09/04/2010 12:47:43 PM 1708 Views
Aragorn is so awesome... - 09/04/2010 02:05:42 PM 1557 Views
Arwen's character is just never fleshed out, though. - 09/04/2010 02:18:30 PM 1529 Views
Re: Arwen's character is just never fleshed out, though. - 09/04/2010 02:49:45 PM 1593 Views
Hm - 09/04/2010 03:23:53 PM 1661 Views
Mostly, yes, but there are a few exceptions - Galadriel, Eowyn, and above all Luthien. - 09/04/2010 03:32:00 PM 1536 Views
Re: Mostly, yes, but there are a few exceptions - Galadriel, Eowyn, and above all Luthien. - 09/04/2010 03:45:37 PM 1812 Views
I can't agree about the goddesses. - 09/04/2010 04:34:15 PM 1644 Views
Re: I can't agree about the goddesses. - 09/04/2010 04:55:34 PM 1532 Views
If Tacitus and Graves were accurate - 09/04/2010 05:09:20 PM 1665 Views
Re: If Tacitus and Graves were accurate - 09/04/2010 05:26:43 PM 1563 Views
I rather liked her depiction in Rome. - 09/04/2010 05:34:37 PM 1637 Views
Re: I rather liked her depiction in Rome. - 09/04/2010 05:45:06 PM 1701 Views
Re: I rather liked her depiction in Rome. - 10/04/2010 11:14:26 AM 1694 Views
I don't know if I'd call it bad, per se. - 10/04/2010 11:37:55 AM 1828 Views
Re: I can't agree about the goddesses. - 09/04/2010 05:02:50 PM 1620 Views
Eh, the other Vala don't do much of anything either. - 09/04/2010 05:31:42 PM 1585 Views
Re: Eh, the other Vala don't do much of anything either. - 09/04/2010 05:44:03 PM 1585 Views
Re: I can't agree about the goddesses. - 09/04/2010 05:06:49 PM 1735 Views
I call bullshit - 09/04/2010 08:09:49 PM 1534 Views
Re: I call bullshit - 09/04/2010 08:31:16 PM 1540 Views
Re: I call bullshit - 10/04/2010 08:04:15 AM 1634 Views
I didn't realize it was fashionable to call Tolkien sexist. - 10/04/2010 05:12:07 PM 1635 Views
Re: I didn't realize it was fashionable to call Tolkien sexist. - 12/04/2010 11:00:23 AM 1506 Views
Exactly. - 13/04/2010 03:08:46 AM 1645 Views
Re: Exactly. - 13/04/2010 08:54:01 AM 1724 Views
I was going to say something similar. - 09/04/2010 03:21:45 PM 1561 Views
Re: Aragorn is so awesome... - 09/04/2010 08:00:25 PM 1528 Views
Re: Aragorn is so awesome... - 09/04/2010 08:37:12 PM 1569 Views
He's good, but then he just doesn't have to face so many things. - 09/04/2010 02:22:04 PM 1857 Views
Doesn't have to face many things? - 09/04/2010 07:59:27 PM 1610 Views
Re: Doesn't have to face many things? - 09/04/2010 08:38:51 PM 1457 Views
Re: Doesn't have to face many things? - 10/04/2010 08:24:33 AM 1590 Views
Re: Doesn't have to face many things? - 10/04/2010 05:08:42 PM 1713 Views
Re: Doesn't have to face many things? - 12/04/2010 10:55:12 AM 1570 Views
He really wasn't a king in majority of the story though - 12/04/2010 05:54:23 PM 1532 Views
I'm sure there are many, but one coming to mind is Prince Josua from Memory, Sorrow and Thorn - 09/04/2010 02:23:57 PM 1559 Views
Oh yeah I liked him a lot *NM* - 09/04/2010 04:09:59 PM 788 Views
Josua Lackhand is a great fantasy King! - 09/04/2010 05:14:39 PM 1612 Views
Arutha was never King. *NM* - 09/04/2010 07:18:30 PM 749 Views
I'm going to go with a tie... - 09/04/2010 04:22:42 PM 1559 Views
Joffrey and the Stag! *NM* - 09/04/2010 09:53:56 PM 758 Views
ROFL *NM* - 09/04/2010 11:39:36 PM 725 Views
Artur Hawkwing - 10/04/2010 03:34:02 AM 1728 Views
??? - 10/04/2010 10:30:13 AM 2154 Views
Simba *NM* - 10/04/2010 08:40:38 AM 821 Views
Manwe - 10/04/2010 10:31:54 AM 2042 Views
Bah. He's hardly a character. *NM* - 12/04/2010 01:07:29 AM 913 Views
Arutha, the Prince of Krondor - 12/04/2010 01:06:14 AM 1633 Views
Westley - 13/04/2010 02:59:36 AM 1607 Views
Leto Atreides II - 13/04/2010 05:07:29 AM 1515 Views
I'll agree with that! *NM* - 13/04/2010 11:33:10 AM 757 Views

Reply to Message