Active Users:1166 Time:14/09/2025 11:27:47 AM
It's more than a few right answers. Dreaded Anomaly Send a noteboard - 15/06/2010 06:26:35 AM
There are currently six known quarks: up, down, strange, charm, bottom, top. Only the first three were known before the second three were predicted by theory in the early 70s; they were all eventually confirmed by experiment, but the top quark wasn't found until 1995.

That's one example of how powerful the predictions of theory can be; there are many more. Obviously, there are a lot of incorrect theories, too. It may seem like physicists just invent new particles to solve any problems, but no matter what we hypothesize, it all comes down to what the experiments show. So far, we have found many predicted "new" particles in consistent ways (although the list of particles that have been proposed and never found is very large indeed).

The Higgs mechanism has been around since 1964, along with the prediction of at least one new particle to go along with it. It's only now that we have the technology to probe the high energy range at which such a particle could be seen.

Don't get caught up in sensationalized news reporting, which makes everything seem like a brand new invention. (To be fair, this was actually one of the better mass-consumption science articles I've read recently.) Most of the theories for which we'll soon be searching for evidence have been around in some form for decades now, being refined and probed.
Reply to message
US experiment hints at 'multiple God particles' - 15/06/2010 04:04:14 AM 838 Views
- 15/06/2010 04:11:11 AM 442 Views
this has always bothered me about particle physicists.... - 15/06/2010 05:32:26 AM 459 Views
Down with particle-of-the-gaps thinking! - 15/06/2010 05:38:20 AM 454 Views
Yeah, always been my problem, too. - 15/06/2010 05:44:30 AM 397 Views
Lederman wanted to call it "the goddamn particle," but the publisher wouldn't let him. - 15/06/2010 06:26:56 AM 418 Views
Well, we've been pretty bad at name stuff - 15/06/2010 08:52:09 AM 427 Views
"Giant radiating dyke swarms"?!!! - 15/06/2010 05:57:11 PM 422 Views
Oh, yes, and it's often accompanied by Dickite - 15/06/2010 06:18:35 PM 409 Views
This I can believe. - 15/06/2010 06:02:37 PM 361 Views
It's more than a few right answers. - 15/06/2010 06:26:35 AM 535 Views
As a physicist... - 15/06/2010 06:13:01 AM 545 Views
Cool. - 16/06/2010 01:01:34 PM 455 Views
I feel ya! *NM* - 17/06/2010 12:18:30 AM 247 Views
As a physicist, I find this quite interesting. - 16/06/2010 09:08:15 PM 538 Views
Not quite. - 16/06/2010 09:57:18 PM 524 Views
Re: Not quite. - 16/06/2010 10:22:14 PM 540 Views
Nerds! - 17/06/2010 12:19:57 AM 362 Views
Re: Not quite. - 17/06/2010 12:45:06 AM 584 Views
Re: Not quite. - 17/06/2010 08:23:10 AM 521 Views
Eight minus three is five - 17/06/2010 09:19:46 AM 364 Views

Reply to Message