Active Users:558 Time:05/03/2026 03:35:48 PM
It's more than a few right answers. Dreaded Anomaly Send a noteboard - 15/06/2010 06:26:35 AM
There are currently six known quarks: up, down, strange, charm, bottom, top. Only the first three were known before the second three were predicted by theory in the early 70s; they were all eventually confirmed by experiment, but the top quark wasn't found until 1995.

That's one example of how powerful the predictions of theory can be; there are many more. Obviously, there are a lot of incorrect theories, too. It may seem like physicists just invent new particles to solve any problems, but no matter what we hypothesize, it all comes down to what the experiments show. So far, we have found many predicted "new" particles in consistent ways (although the list of particles that have been proposed and never found is very large indeed).

The Higgs mechanism has been around since 1964, along with the prediction of at least one new particle to go along with it. It's only now that we have the technology to probe the high energy range at which such a particle could be seen.

Don't get caught up in sensationalized news reporting, which makes everything seem like a brand new invention. (To be fair, this was actually one of the better mass-consumption science articles I've read recently.) Most of the theories for which we'll soon be searching for evidence have been around in some form for decades now, being refined and probed.
Reply to message
US experiment hints at 'multiple God particles' - 15/06/2010 04:04:14 AM 893 Views
- 15/06/2010 04:11:11 AM 487 Views
this has always bothered me about particle physicists.... - 15/06/2010 05:32:26 AM 508 Views
Down with particle-of-the-gaps thinking! - 15/06/2010 05:38:20 AM 494 Views
Yeah, always been my problem, too. - 15/06/2010 05:44:30 AM 441 Views
Lederman wanted to call it "the goddamn particle," but the publisher wouldn't let him. - 15/06/2010 06:26:56 AM 459 Views
Well, we've been pretty bad at name stuff - 15/06/2010 08:52:09 AM 473 Views
"Giant radiating dyke swarms"?!!! - 15/06/2010 05:57:11 PM 464 Views
Oh, yes, and it's often accompanied by Dickite - 15/06/2010 06:18:35 PM 446 Views
This I can believe. - 15/06/2010 06:02:37 PM 398 Views
It's more than a few right answers. - 15/06/2010 06:26:35 AM 598 Views
As a physicist... - 15/06/2010 06:13:01 AM 587 Views
Cool. - 16/06/2010 01:01:34 PM 489 Views
I feel ya! *NM* - 17/06/2010 12:18:30 AM 265 Views
As a physicist, I find this quite interesting. - 16/06/2010 09:08:15 PM 579 Views
Not quite. - 16/06/2010 09:57:18 PM 578 Views
Re: Not quite. - 16/06/2010 10:22:14 PM 596 Views
Nerds! - 17/06/2010 12:19:57 AM 419 Views
Re: Not quite. - 17/06/2010 12:45:06 AM 648 Views
Re: Not quite. - 17/06/2010 08:23:10 AM 570 Views
Eight minus three is five - 17/06/2010 09:19:46 AM 411 Views

Reply to Message