Rescue him and kiss him all better
Let's ban all Christian Marriage.
- 07/08/2010 06:36:13 AM
1697 Views
Nice satire, but it raises another point for me.
- 07/08/2010 07:20:49 AM
1078 Views
That would only be appropriate if Christians wanted to ban secular unions of normal people.
- 07/08/2010 11:51:29 AM
1347 Views
Hey, look! There was a point over there!
- 07/08/2010 03:46:41 PM
1146 Views
Who else should make those decisions?
- 07/08/2010 08:00:39 PM
1103 Views
I'd totally...
- 08/08/2010 04:14:15 AM
1032 Views
I'd totally...
- 08/08/2010 06:17:30 AM
1184 Views
I used to think Joel was the biggest rambler on this site. I am seriously reconsidering.
- 08/08/2010 05:24:56 AM
1127 Views
And my assessment of one poster as the most content-poor, non-contributing slug is unchanged
- 08/08/2010 07:17:02 PM
1021 Views
*Shakes Head*
- 08/08/2010 06:23:47 AM
989 Views
I highly doubt Cannoli is "scared" of homosexuals *NM*
- 08/08/2010 06:29:54 AM
564 Views
Perhaps not in the physical sense.
- 08/08/2010 06:35:53 AM
1087 Views
Re: Perhaps not in the physical sense.
- 08/08/2010 06:46:56 AM
1045 Views
Re: *Shakes Head*
- 08/08/2010 07:43:11 PM
1038 Views
I still do not see how you think marriage is a "pointless" institution
- 08/08/2010 08:05:45 PM
1136 Views
No, I was referring to same-sex marriage. Real marriage hardly counts as a novelty. *NM*
- 11/08/2010 02:28:43 PM
469 Views
This must be the "thought out reaction" I've heard so much about.
- 08/08/2010 10:45:59 PM
981 Views
You cannot be that stupid.
- 11/08/2010 03:10:55 PM
1262 Views
There's a lot of ridiculous arguments here, but I'll focus on just one of them...
- 11/08/2010 03:38:05 PM
1179 Views
A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too
- 08/08/2010 11:51:24 PM
1008 Views
Plolygamy and incest are not on the same level of bad.
- 09/08/2010 11:00:07 AM
1071 Views
Is that assumption valid?
- 09/08/2010 11:36:26 AM
997 Views
Re: Is that assumption valid?
- 09/08/2010 11:46:42 AM
984 Views
Re: Is that assumption valid?
- 09/08/2010 12:07:22 PM
1093 Views
Not really
- 09/08/2010 01:20:46 PM
960 Views
Re: Not really
- 09/08/2010 01:27:04 PM
1087 Views
Spoken like someone who does not have to insure an employee's six wives.
- 11/08/2010 03:11:57 PM
1122 Views
Re: A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too
- 09/08/2010 11:25:39 AM
1032 Views
Re: A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too
- 09/08/2010 11:51:50 AM
990 Views
Re: A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too
- 09/08/2010 01:18:35 PM
1076 Views
Re: A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too
- 09/08/2010 02:54:19 PM
1105 Views
It should be noted again...
- 09/08/2010 08:59:32 PM
1115 Views
and how is it not a right?
- 09/08/2010 09:19:12 PM
996 Views
My definition of rights...
- 09/08/2010 10:47:16 PM
1114 Views
mmm, but the UN has legally stated marriage as a right.
- 10/08/2010 02:52:03 AM
876 Views
Article 16 probably not a great example
- 10/08/2010 03:44:04 AM
969 Views
- 10/08/2010 03:44:04 AM
969 Views
You could just as easily move the emphasis...
- 10/08/2010 04:08:46 AM
1118 Views
If we need a more specific resolution...
- 10/08/2010 04:22:12 AM
1299 Views
No, the choice of 'Men and Women' is too specific in the context
- 10/08/2010 05:25:57 AM
988 Views
Re: No, the choice of 'Men and Women' is too specific in the context
- 10/08/2010 03:04:39 PM
1312 Views
That's really a ridiculous stance, you do realize.
- 10/08/2010 03:23:02 PM
925 Views
The point is that marriage IS a right, one which cannot be denied based upon sexual orientation *NM*
- 10/08/2010 07:04:16 PM
746 Views
Re: No, the choice of 'Men and Women' is too specific in the context
- 10/08/2010 03:46:56 PM
1164 Views
It doesn't say a man can only marry a woman or vice versa, though.
- 10/08/2010 04:24:17 AM
992 Views
I know, and that's been brought up before. But that's not my point.
- 10/08/2010 06:09:32 PM
963 Views
Re: I know, and that's been brought up before. But that's not my point.
- 10/08/2010 06:33:56 PM
899 Views
It's mentioned as a right in some SC decision quoted in that Walker opinion. *NM*
- 10/08/2010 06:51:13 PM
481 Views
To clarify for you
- 10/08/2010 05:36:14 AM
966 Views
The UNSC is actually the UN's enforcement body...
- 10/08/2010 07:16:31 PM
1361 Views
I'm not sure that I would call the Security Council the 'Enforcement Body'
- 10/08/2010 08:43:02 PM
959 Views
The fact that it is capable of authorizing the use of military force makes it an enforcement body
- 10/08/2010 10:33:59 PM
1252 Views
What the UN thinks is *completely* worthless....
- 10/08/2010 06:43:15 PM
918 Views
Why don't YOU back up your assertion that the right to marry exists? *NM*
- 11/08/2010 03:16:02 PM
516 Views
The actual ruling on Prop 8 specifices marriage as a freedom, not a right.
- 10/08/2010 12:02:17 AM
1101 Views
Out of curiosity, what would you say to using the Ninth Amendment, possibly in conjunction...
- 10/08/2010 12:20:19 AM
1156 Views
Note it all you want...
- 10/08/2010 06:43:53 AM
848 Views
No, they seek to expand the terms of the partnership. Homosexuals can & do get married normally *NM*
- 11/08/2010 03:14:25 PM
550 Views
The best one yet.
- 10/08/2010 07:59:17 PM
1106 Views
Yeah, I'd agree that's pretty insane
- 10/08/2010 08:49:24 PM
961 Views
Re: Yeah, I'd agree that's pretty insane
- 10/08/2010 09:03:11 PM
1083 Views
Re: Yeah, I'd agree that's pretty insane
- 11/08/2010 04:35:03 PM
980 Views
Re: Yeah, I'd agree that's pretty insane
- 11/08/2010 04:41:23 PM
1113 Views
Hmm - been a long time since I read my copy of the graphic novel
- 11/08/2010 05:06:47 PM
1086 Views
Re: Hmm - been a long time since I read my copy of the graphic novel
- 11/08/2010 05:09:23 PM
1038 Views
