Re: A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too
snoopcester Send a noteboard - 09/08/2010 11:25:39 AM
It's probably worth noting people are horribly abusing the facts with a lot of citations of 'rights' going on here, however, for the sake of argument, can anyone justify gay marriage without justifying polygamy or incest and without mentioning procreation or two?
Are they horribly abusing facts or is it just that you don't agree with them? Because that would be something else.
polygamy
In theory I have no problem with it. The issues with it have been discussed elsewhere on the board in the last week (I think by Tom) - basically it creates a real mess with existing legislation in a way that same sex marriage doesn't (since it is stil between two people it just slots into the existing tax legislation, for example). It would probably take some rewriting to extend tax breaks across x many people in a marriage... and one hell of a hard sell to the publis to explain why Jane and her 18 husbands deserve to pay so little tax.
incest
Well since you want a key reason not to be mentioned, there is the other one - the fact it is more than possible for someone to be "groomed" from their early years for the relationship. Too much risk of abuse and it not being a healthy, really consent based relationship.
*MySmiley*
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Let's ban all Christian Marriage.
07/08/2010 06:36:13 AM
- 1493 Views
Nice satire, but it raises another point for me.
07/08/2010 07:20:49 AM
- 922 Views
That would only be appropriate if Christians wanted to ban secular unions of normal people.
07/08/2010 11:51:29 AM
- 1139 Views
Hey, look! There was a point over there!
07/08/2010 03:46:41 PM
- 955 Views
Who else should make those decisions?
07/08/2010 08:00:39 PM
- 898 Views
I'd totally...
08/08/2010 04:14:15 AM
- 870 Views
I'd totally...
08/08/2010 06:17:30 AM
- 1015 Views
I used to think Joel was the biggest rambler on this site. I am seriously reconsidering.
08/08/2010 05:24:56 AM
- 940 Views
And my assessment of one poster as the most content-poor, non-contributing slug is unchanged
08/08/2010 07:17:02 PM
- 853 Views
*Shakes Head*
08/08/2010 06:23:47 AM
- 823 Views
I highly doubt Cannoli is "scared" of homosexuals *NM*
08/08/2010 06:29:54 AM
- 483 Views
Perhaps not in the physical sense.
08/08/2010 06:35:53 AM
- 913 Views
Re: Perhaps not in the physical sense.
08/08/2010 06:46:56 AM
- 876 Views
Re: *Shakes Head*
08/08/2010 07:43:11 PM
- 867 Views
I still do not see how you think marriage is a "pointless" institution
08/08/2010 08:05:45 PM
- 966 Views
No, I was referring to same-sex marriage. Real marriage hardly counts as a novelty. *NM*
11/08/2010 02:28:43 PM
- 396 Views
This must be the "thought out reaction" I've heard so much about.
08/08/2010 10:45:59 PM
- 810 Views
You cannot be that stupid.
11/08/2010 03:10:55 PM
- 1097 Views
There's a lot of ridiculous arguments here, but I'll focus on just one of them...
11/08/2010 03:38:05 PM
- 980 Views
A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too
08/08/2010 11:51:24 PM
- 839 Views
Plolygamy and incest are not on the same level of bad.
09/08/2010 11:00:07 AM
- 883 Views
Is that assumption valid?
09/08/2010 11:36:26 AM
- 830 Views
Re: Is that assumption valid?
09/08/2010 11:46:42 AM
- 812 Views
Re: Is that assumption valid?
09/08/2010 12:07:22 PM
- 930 Views
Spoken like someone who does not have to insure an employee's six wives.
11/08/2010 03:11:57 PM
- 959 Views
Re: A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too
09/08/2010 11:25:39 AM
- 843 Views
Re: A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too
09/08/2010 11:51:50 AM
- 807 Views
Re: A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too
09/08/2010 01:18:35 PM
- 895 Views
Re: A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too
09/08/2010 02:54:19 PM
- 915 Views
It should be noted again...
09/08/2010 08:59:32 PM
- 937 Views
and how is it not a right?
09/08/2010 09:19:12 PM
- 814 Views
My definition of rights...
09/08/2010 10:47:16 PM
- 941 Views
mmm, but the UN has legally stated marriage as a right.
10/08/2010 02:52:03 AM
- 715 Views
Article 16 probably not a great example
10/08/2010 03:44:04 AM
- 813 Views
You could just as easily move the emphasis...
10/08/2010 04:08:46 AM
- 929 Views
If we need a more specific resolution...
10/08/2010 04:22:12 AM
- 1103 Views
No, the choice of 'Men and Women' is too specific in the context
10/08/2010 05:25:57 AM
- 807 Views
Re: No, the choice of 'Men and Women' is too specific in the context
10/08/2010 03:04:39 PM
- 1110 Views
That's really a ridiculous stance, you do realize.
10/08/2010 03:23:02 PM
- 776 Views
The point is that marriage IS a right, one which cannot be denied based upon sexual orientation *NM*
10/08/2010 07:04:16 PM
- 647 Views
Re: No, the choice of 'Men and Women' is too specific in the context
10/08/2010 03:46:56 PM
- 996 Views
It doesn't say a man can only marry a woman or vice versa, though.
10/08/2010 04:24:17 AM
- 808 Views
I know, and that's been brought up before. But that's not my point.
10/08/2010 06:09:32 PM
- 802 Views
Re: I know, and that's been brought up before. But that's not my point.
10/08/2010 06:33:56 PM
- 732 Views
It's mentioned as a right in some SC decision quoted in that Walker opinion. *NM*
10/08/2010 06:51:13 PM
- 408 Views
To clarify for you
10/08/2010 05:36:14 AM
- 738 Views
The UNSC is actually the UN's enforcement body...
10/08/2010 07:16:31 PM
- 1180 Views
I'm not sure that I would call the Security Council the 'Enforcement Body'
10/08/2010 08:43:02 PM
- 786 Views
The fact that it is capable of authorizing the use of military force makes it an enforcement body
10/08/2010 10:33:59 PM
- 1043 Views
What the UN thinks is *completely* worthless....
10/08/2010 06:43:15 PM
- 749 Views
Why don't YOU back up your assertion that the right to marry exists? *NM*
11/08/2010 03:16:02 PM
- 454 Views
The actual ruling on Prop 8 specifices marriage as a freedom, not a right.
10/08/2010 12:02:17 AM
- 886 Views
Out of curiosity, what would you say to using the Ninth Amendment, possibly in conjunction...
10/08/2010 12:20:19 AM
- 962 Views
Note it all you want...
10/08/2010 06:43:53 AM
- 682 Views
No, they seek to expand the terms of the partnership. Homosexuals can & do get married normally *NM*
11/08/2010 03:14:25 PM
- 457 Views
The best one yet.
10/08/2010 07:59:17 PM
- 928 Views
Yeah, I'd agree that's pretty insane
10/08/2010 08:49:24 PM
- 807 Views
Re: Yeah, I'd agree that's pretty insane
10/08/2010 09:03:11 PM
- 911 Views
Re: Yeah, I'd agree that's pretty insane
11/08/2010 04:35:03 PM
- 793 Views
Re: Yeah, I'd agree that's pretty insane
11/08/2010 04:41:23 PM
- 914 Views
Hmm - been a long time since I read my copy of the graphic novel
11/08/2010 05:06:47 PM
- 891 Views
Re: Hmm - been a long time since I read my copy of the graphic novel
11/08/2010 05:09:23 PM
- 882 Views