Active Users:413 Time:17/06/2025 11:51:03 PM
Re: 'Fraid not. random thoughts Send a noteboard - 15/09/2009 01:21:14 AM
It's a shittily written article.


The only thing I see shitty is the shallowness of the criticism.

* Space

Objects in space, which are more than 8,000 light years away, can be seen from earth.


See this is people who laugh at the other side but don't understand the issues themselves come in.



This is under the category "Arguments to support evolution." What the bloody blue blazes does that have to do with anything?


This is an important point against the argument that the universe is only 6,000 years old. How can that be when some of the light reaching the earth took more then 8,000 years to get here?

I wouldn't put it at the top of my list but it does have something to with the issue.

Maybe this is a joke newspaper in the UK - I'm not familiar with it, I just recognize the name. But this is shoddy "journalism," about something that's already a hot-button topic.


Did you believe it was meant to settle the issue instead of just give some highlights?

Now if you really want me to "refute any of the claims made by creationist outside of [my] semantics issue," I could go to town. But really I thought the whole article was stupid, but didn't feel like spending too much time on it, so I made one pithy comment and moved on. ~shrug~


yet you are still in the discussion haven't shown any knowledge of the issue as of yet.

I can do a fine job refuting creationism myself and I can do it without simply pointing and laughing at people.
Reply to message
I can't even believe this. - 13/09/2009 07:40:02 PM 1125 Views
Take a deep breath, close your eyes and go to your happy place. - 13/09/2009 07:43:15 PM 659 Views
Re: Take a deep breath, close your eyes and go to your happy place. - 13/09/2009 10:28:42 PM 747 Views
That is one amazingly stupid article... - 13/09/2009 08:04:47 PM 695 Views
ditto *NM* - 13/09/2009 08:11:45 PM 339 Views
Re: ditto - 13/09/2009 10:01:54 PM 788 Views
wow why a witty and well thought out rebuttal. - 14/09/2009 10:02:14 PM 672 Views
Ugh. Interesting subject, awful article. - 13/09/2009 08:27:15 PM 723 Views
Re: I can't even believe this. - 13/09/2009 09:05:45 PM 677 Views
Re: I can't even believe this. - 13/09/2009 10:33:47 PM 602 Views
I'd agree with you, if... - 13/09/2009 10:36:07 PM 673 Views
*sigh* People bashing other people. - 13/09/2009 10:02:54 PM 738 Views
The author used the phrase "proven theories." Ergo, their argument is invalid. *NM* - 14/09/2009 01:11:51 AM 351 Views
seriously. there's no such thing as a truly proven theory - 14/09/2009 01:52:30 AM 656 Views
Re: definition of "theory" - 14/09/2009 04:49:13 AM 729 Views
Re: definition of "theory" - 14/09/2009 08:56:48 AM 813 Views
I can't really tell - 14/09/2009 08:14:14 PM 700 Views
Re: I think I was agreeing with you, yes *NM* - 15/09/2009 12:37:00 AM 328 Views
Oh, good. I'll let you live. *NM* - 15/09/2009 01:55:49 AM 379 Views
I think you are getting workedup over nothing - 14/09/2009 09:57:22 PM 849 Views
That's... not exactly it. - 14/09/2009 10:33:02 PM 611 Views
not that is exactly it - 14/09/2009 11:10:52 PM 862 Views
No, Craig is quite right. - 14/09/2009 11:21:11 PM 658 Views
Heh. You were much more diplomatic about it than I was. *NM* - 14/09/2009 11:24:41 PM 378 Views
No you just happen to wrong with him - 15/09/2009 01:14:16 AM 666 Views
Well, maybe this has to do with your low opinion of the British press... - 15/09/2009 10:51:46 AM 855 Views
Re: Well, maybe this has to do with your low opinion of the British press... - 15/09/2009 05:32:51 PM 820 Views
To butt in for a second... - 15/09/2009 07:38:05 PM 672 Views
'Fraid not. - 14/09/2009 11:24:00 PM 668 Views
Re: 'Fraid not. - 15/09/2009 01:21:14 AM 660 Views
Re: 'Fraid not. - 15/09/2009 01:22:59 AM 780 Views
Ithat was meant to be an eidt. oh well - 15/09/2009 01:23:36 AM 731 Views
- 15/09/2009 02:14:37 AM 744 Views
completely aside from this argument you guys have here... - 15/09/2009 05:02:21 AM 707 Views
Interrupter! - 15/09/2009 06:11:40 AM 646 Views
Re: Interrupter! - 15/09/2009 06:54:56 AM 749 Views
One brain C4, coming up... - 15/09/2009 12:00:26 PM 704 Views
Nicely put - 15/09/2009 03:48:42 PM 631 Views
Yes, I know. - 15/09/2009 04:55:22 PM 772 Views
PFt - 15/09/2009 04:56:19 PM 643 Views
Are you telling me I am getting predictable? - 15/09/2009 04:58:59 PM 736 Views
The age of the universe is an important point in the creationist argument - 15/09/2009 05:53:41 PM 724 Views
Exactly. So it was in the wrong column. - 15/09/2009 07:58:15 PM 683 Views
what I think has been lost in the debate is it looks like it will be a good movie - 15/09/2009 08:14:04 PM 743 Views
That, I can agree with. *NM* - 15/09/2009 08:22:44 PM 348 Views
Um. - 14/09/2009 11:28:28 PM 799 Views
LOL - 15/09/2009 09:29:16 PM 735 Views
Really? Because this was a rather atypical debate, honestly. - 15/09/2009 09:43:13 PM 622 Views
Heh. - 15/09/2009 09:54:00 PM 744 Views
Well, I can pretend if you want me to - 15/09/2009 10:07:59 PM 1185 Views
I happen to find it all extremely interesting - 15/09/2009 10:23:19 PM 672 Views
Re: I happen to find it all extremely interesting - 15/09/2009 10:36:14 PM 695 Views
There are some places you can go that discuss the creationist ideas - 15/09/2009 10:58:25 PM 815 Views
Having just been to the Creationist Museum last Monday - 16/09/2009 12:00:12 AM 952 Views
All hail the Flying Spaghetti Monster! - 16/09/2009 06:03:20 AM 648 Views

Reply to Message