Active Users:635 Time:03/08/2025 10:15:45 AM
Re: 'Fraid not. random thoughts Send a noteboard - 15/09/2009 01:22:59 AM
It's a shittily written article.


The only thing I see shitty is the shallowness of the criticism.

* Space

Objects in space, which are more than 8,000 light years away, can be seen from earth.

This is under the category "Arguments to support evolution." What the bloody blue blazes does that have to do with anything?


See this is people who laugh at the other side but don't understand the issues themselves come in.

This is an important point against the argument that the universe is only 6,000 years old. How can that be when some of the light reaching the earth took more then 8,000 years to get here?

I wouldn't put it at the top of my list but it does have something to with the issue and it is easier for the layperson to understand then most dating methods.

Maybe this is a joke newspaper in the UK - I'm not familiar with it, I just recognize the name. But this is shoddy "journalism," about something that's already a hot-button topic.


Did you believe it was meant to settle the issue instead of just give some highlights?

Now if you really want me to "refute any of the claims made by creationist outside of [my] semantics issue," I could go to town. But really I thought the whole article was stupid, but didn't feel like spending too much time on it, so I made one pithy comment and moved on. ~shrug~


yet you are still in the discussion haven't shown any knowledge of the issue as of yet.

I can do a fine job refuting creationism myself and I can do it without simply pointing and laughing at people.
Reply to message
I can't even believe this. - 13/09/2009 07:40:02 PM 1135 Views
Take a deep breath, close your eyes and go to your happy place. - 13/09/2009 07:43:15 PM 671 Views
Re: Take a deep breath, close your eyes and go to your happy place. - 13/09/2009 10:28:42 PM 760 Views
That is one amazingly stupid article... - 13/09/2009 08:04:47 PM 706 Views
ditto *NM* - 13/09/2009 08:11:45 PM 343 Views
Re: ditto - 13/09/2009 10:01:54 PM 799 Views
wow why a witty and well thought out rebuttal. - 14/09/2009 10:02:14 PM 684 Views
Ugh. Interesting subject, awful article. - 13/09/2009 08:27:15 PM 733 Views
Re: I can't even believe this. - 13/09/2009 09:05:45 PM 686 Views
Re: I can't even believe this. - 13/09/2009 10:33:47 PM 612 Views
I'd agree with you, if... - 13/09/2009 10:36:07 PM 684 Views
*sigh* People bashing other people. - 13/09/2009 10:02:54 PM 748 Views
The author used the phrase "proven theories." Ergo, their argument is invalid. *NM* - 14/09/2009 01:11:51 AM 355 Views
seriously. there's no such thing as a truly proven theory - 14/09/2009 01:52:30 AM 665 Views
Re: definition of "theory" - 14/09/2009 04:49:13 AM 740 Views
Re: definition of "theory" - 14/09/2009 08:56:48 AM 827 Views
I can't really tell - 14/09/2009 08:14:14 PM 711 Views
Re: I think I was agreeing with you, yes *NM* - 15/09/2009 12:37:00 AM 333 Views
Oh, good. I'll let you live. *NM* - 15/09/2009 01:55:49 AM 383 Views
I think you are getting workedup over nothing - 14/09/2009 09:57:22 PM 860 Views
That's... not exactly it. - 14/09/2009 10:33:02 PM 621 Views
not that is exactly it - 14/09/2009 11:10:52 PM 874 Views
No, Craig is quite right. - 14/09/2009 11:21:11 PM 671 Views
Heh. You were much more diplomatic about it than I was. *NM* - 14/09/2009 11:24:41 PM 381 Views
No you just happen to wrong with him - 15/09/2009 01:14:16 AM 680 Views
Well, maybe this has to do with your low opinion of the British press... - 15/09/2009 10:51:46 AM 864 Views
Re: Well, maybe this has to do with your low opinion of the British press... - 15/09/2009 05:32:51 PM 830 Views
To butt in for a second... - 15/09/2009 07:38:05 PM 686 Views
'Fraid not. - 14/09/2009 11:24:00 PM 681 Views
Re: 'Fraid not. - 15/09/2009 01:21:14 AM 669 Views
Re: 'Fraid not. - 15/09/2009 01:22:59 AM 793 Views
Ithat was meant to be an eidt. oh well - 15/09/2009 01:23:36 AM 742 Views
- 15/09/2009 02:14:37 AM 754 Views
completely aside from this argument you guys have here... - 15/09/2009 05:02:21 AM 720 Views
Interrupter! - 15/09/2009 06:11:40 AM 657 Views
Re: Interrupter! - 15/09/2009 06:54:56 AM 761 Views
One brain C4, coming up... - 15/09/2009 12:00:26 PM 715 Views
Nicely put - 15/09/2009 03:48:42 PM 640 Views
Yes, I know. - 15/09/2009 04:55:22 PM 779 Views
PFt - 15/09/2009 04:56:19 PM 653 Views
Are you telling me I am getting predictable? - 15/09/2009 04:58:59 PM 748 Views
The age of the universe is an important point in the creationist argument - 15/09/2009 05:53:41 PM 735 Views
Exactly. So it was in the wrong column. - 15/09/2009 07:58:15 PM 693 Views
what I think has been lost in the debate is it looks like it will be a good movie - 15/09/2009 08:14:04 PM 756 Views
That, I can agree with. *NM* - 15/09/2009 08:22:44 PM 352 Views
Um. - 14/09/2009 11:28:28 PM 809 Views
LOL - 15/09/2009 09:29:16 PM 745 Views
Really? Because this was a rather atypical debate, honestly. - 15/09/2009 09:43:13 PM 646 Views
Heh. - 15/09/2009 09:54:00 PM 754 Views
Well, I can pretend if you want me to - 15/09/2009 10:07:59 PM 1194 Views
I happen to find it all extremely interesting - 15/09/2009 10:23:19 PM 683 Views
Re: I happen to find it all extremely interesting - 15/09/2009 10:36:14 PM 731 Views
There are some places you can go that discuss the creationist ideas - 15/09/2009 10:58:25 PM 829 Views
Having just been to the Creationist Museum last Monday - 16/09/2009 12:00:12 AM 964 Views
All hail the Flying Spaghetti Monster! - 16/09/2009 06:03:20 AM 658 Views

Reply to Message