And as for the 8000 lightyears argument, I have to disagree with Craig, I do think astronomy is relevant in the discussion. But the way that argument is presented is idiotic. If creationists actually believed that there were objects 8000 lightyears away whose light is reaching the earth only now, they wouldn't be creationists to begin with.
I don't actually disagree that the point has some relevance in the context of the discussion. I was merely pointing out that, since the author didn't actually give any context whilst adding that as an "argument to support evolution," it was a worthless addition. Anyway it's not so much an "argument to support evolution" as it is an "argument to dispute creationism." Just another nitpick at the shitty writing.
I am made of poison.
I can't even believe this.
13/09/2009 07:40:02 PM
- 1136 Views
Take a deep breath, close your eyes and go to your happy place.
13/09/2009 07:43:15 PM
- 671 Views
Re: Take a deep breath, close your eyes and go to your happy place.
13/09/2009 10:28:42 PM
- 760 Views
That is one amazingly stupid article...
13/09/2009 08:04:47 PM
- 706 Views
The author used the phrase "proven theories." Ergo, their argument is invalid. *NM*
14/09/2009 01:11:51 AM
- 356 Views
seriously. there's no such thing as a truly proven theory
14/09/2009 01:52:30 AM
- 665 Views
Re: definition of "theory"
14/09/2009 04:49:13 AM
- 740 Views
I can't really tell
14/09/2009 08:14:14 PM
- 712 Views
I think you are getting workedup over nothing
14/09/2009 09:57:22 PM
- 860 Views
That's... not exactly it.
14/09/2009 10:33:02 PM
- 621 Views
not that is exactly it
14/09/2009 11:10:52 PM
- 874 Views
No, Craig is quite right.
14/09/2009 11:21:11 PM
- 671 Views
No you just happen to wrong with him
15/09/2009 01:14:16 AM
- 681 Views
Well, maybe this has to do with your low opinion of the British press...
15/09/2009 10:51:46 AM
- 864 Views

Re: Well, maybe this has to do with your low opinion of the British press...
15/09/2009 05:32:51 PM
- 830 Views

To butt in for a second...
15/09/2009 07:38:05 PM
- 687 Views
'Fraid not.
14/09/2009 11:24:00 PM
- 681 Views
It's not, it's supposed to be relatively decent - mainstream conservative newspaper. *NM*
14/09/2009 11:28:44 PM
- 317 Views
Re: 'Fraid not.
15/09/2009 01:21:14 AM
- 669 Views
15/09/2009 02:14:37 AM
- 754 Views

completely aside from this argument you guys have here...
15/09/2009 05:02:21 AM
- 720 Views
Interrupter!
15/09/2009 06:11:40 AM
- 657 Views
Re: Interrupter!
15/09/2009 06:54:56 AM
- 761 Views
One brain C4, coming up...
15/09/2009 12:00:26 PM
- 715 Views
The age of the universe is an important point in the creationist argument
15/09/2009 05:53:41 PM
- 735 Views
Exactly. So it was in the wrong column.
15/09/2009 07:58:15 PM
- 693 Views
what I think has been lost in the debate is it looks like it will be a good movie
15/09/2009 08:14:04 PM
- 756 Views
Um.
14/09/2009 11:28:28 PM
- 810 Views
LOL
15/09/2009 09:29:16 PM
- 745 Views
Really? Because this was a rather atypical debate, honestly.
15/09/2009 09:43:13 PM
- 646 Views
Well, I can pretend if you want me to
15/09/2009 10:07:59 PM
- 1194 Views

I happen to find it all extremely interesting
15/09/2009 10:23:19 PM
- 684 Views
There are some places you can go that discuss the creationist ideas
15/09/2009 10:58:25 PM
- 829 Views