And as for the 8000 lightyears argument, I have to disagree with Craig, I do think astronomy is relevant in the discussion. But the way that argument is presented is idiotic. If creationists actually believed that there were objects 8000 lightyears away whose light is reaching the earth only now, they wouldn't be creationists to begin with.
I don't actually disagree that the point has some relevance in the context of the discussion. I was merely pointing out that, since the author didn't actually give any context whilst adding that as an "argument to support evolution," it was a worthless addition. Anyway it's not so much an "argument to support evolution" as it is an "argument to dispute creationism." Just another nitpick at the shitty writing.
I am made of poison.
I can't even believe this.
- 13/09/2009 07:40:02 PM
1170 Views
Take a deep breath, close your eyes and go to your happy place.
- 13/09/2009 07:43:15 PM
701 Views
Re: Take a deep breath, close your eyes and go to your happy place.
- 13/09/2009 10:28:42 PM
787 Views
That is one amazingly stupid article...
- 13/09/2009 08:04:47 PM
737 Views
The author used the phrase "proven theories." Ergo, their argument is invalid. *NM*
- 14/09/2009 01:11:51 AM
386 Views
seriously. there's no such thing as a truly proven theory
- 14/09/2009 01:52:30 AM
695 Views
Re: definition of "theory"
- 14/09/2009 04:49:13 AM
776 Views
I can't really tell
- 14/09/2009 08:14:14 PM
743 Views
I think you are getting workedup over nothing
- 14/09/2009 09:57:22 PM
892 Views
That's... not exactly it.
- 14/09/2009 10:33:02 PM
653 Views
not that is exactly it
- 14/09/2009 11:10:52 PM
907 Views
No, Craig is quite right.
- 14/09/2009 11:21:11 PM
704 Views
No you just happen to wrong with him
- 15/09/2009 01:14:16 AM
711 Views
Well, maybe this has to do with your low opinion of the British press...
- 15/09/2009 10:51:46 AM
897 Views
- 15/09/2009 10:51:46 AM
897 Views
Re: Well, maybe this has to do with your low opinion of the British press...
- 15/09/2009 05:32:51 PM
867 Views
- 15/09/2009 05:32:51 PM
867 Views
To butt in for a second...
- 15/09/2009 07:38:05 PM
721 Views
'Fraid not.
- 14/09/2009 11:24:00 PM
712 Views
It's not, it's supposed to be relatively decent - mainstream conservative newspaper. *NM*
- 14/09/2009 11:28:44 PM
331 Views
Re: 'Fraid not.
- 15/09/2009 01:21:14 AM
697 Views
- 15/09/2009 02:14:37 AM
791 Views
- 15/09/2009 02:14:37 AM
791 Views
completely aside from this argument you guys have here...
- 15/09/2009 05:02:21 AM
761 Views
Interrupter!
- 15/09/2009 06:11:40 AM
690 Views
Re: Interrupter!
- 15/09/2009 06:54:56 AM
792 Views
One brain C4, coming up...
- 15/09/2009 12:00:26 PM
764 Views
The age of the universe is an important point in the creationist argument
- 15/09/2009 05:53:41 PM
767 Views
Exactly. So it was in the wrong column.
- 15/09/2009 07:58:15 PM
726 Views
what I think has been lost in the debate is it looks like it will be a good movie
- 15/09/2009 08:14:04 PM
789 Views
Um.
- 14/09/2009 11:28:28 PM
841 Views
LOL
- 15/09/2009 09:29:16 PM
775 Views
Really? Because this was a rather atypical debate, honestly.
- 15/09/2009 09:43:13 PM
691 Views
Well, I can pretend if you want me to
- 15/09/2009 10:07:59 PM
1226 Views
- 15/09/2009 10:07:59 PM
1226 Views
I happen to find it all extremely interesting
- 15/09/2009 10:23:19 PM
714 Views
There are some places you can go that discuss the creationist ideas
- 15/09/2009 10:58:25 PM
859 Views

*NM*