what I think has been lost in the debate is it looks like it will be a good movie
random thoughts Send a noteboard - 15/09/2009 08:14:04 PM
It was an f*ing filme review and the first post claimed it was an article supporting creationism. Instead of calling that idea silly we got a bunch of people apearing to agre. From what I can see the majority of those people know very little about the creationist thinking or the debate between creation an evolution. I find all of that highly ironic.
See, there's the problem. It wasn't a film review - it's an article about an upcoming movie, and the debate it has sparked. In fact, the title of the article is "Creation film sparks evolution arguments." And the author decides to take it upon his/herself to finish up with a terrible list of the "top 5 arguments for each side."
Maybe it's just me (though judging from this thread, I doubt it), but it also looked like the author spend a modicum more time on the "arguments for creation" column, which led me to believe that was his/her personal stance. Regardless, the general shoddiness of the article stands, no matter the author's personal feelings on the matter.
I can't even believe this.
- 13/09/2009 07:40:02 PM
1171 Views
Take a deep breath, close your eyes and go to your happy place.
- 13/09/2009 07:43:15 PM
703 Views
Re: Take a deep breath, close your eyes and go to your happy place.
- 13/09/2009 10:28:42 PM
788 Views
That is one amazingly stupid article...
- 13/09/2009 08:04:47 PM
738 Views
The author used the phrase "proven theories." Ergo, their argument is invalid. *NM*
- 14/09/2009 01:11:51 AM
386 Views
seriously. there's no such thing as a truly proven theory
- 14/09/2009 01:52:30 AM
696 Views
Re: definition of "theory"
- 14/09/2009 04:49:13 AM
777 Views
I can't really tell
- 14/09/2009 08:14:14 PM
743 Views
I think you are getting workedup over nothing
- 14/09/2009 09:57:22 PM
893 Views
That's... not exactly it.
- 14/09/2009 10:33:02 PM
654 Views
not that is exactly it
- 14/09/2009 11:10:52 PM
908 Views
No, Craig is quite right.
- 14/09/2009 11:21:11 PM
705 Views
No you just happen to wrong with him
- 15/09/2009 01:14:16 AM
711 Views
Well, maybe this has to do with your low opinion of the British press...
- 15/09/2009 10:51:46 AM
899 Views
- 15/09/2009 10:51:46 AM
899 Views
Re: Well, maybe this has to do with your low opinion of the British press...
- 15/09/2009 05:32:51 PM
868 Views
- 15/09/2009 05:32:51 PM
868 Views
'Fraid not.
- 14/09/2009 11:24:00 PM
713 Views
It's not, it's supposed to be relatively decent - mainstream conservative newspaper. *NM*
- 14/09/2009 11:28:44 PM
333 Views
Re: 'Fraid not.
- 15/09/2009 01:21:14 AM
698 Views
- 15/09/2009 02:14:37 AM
792 Views
- 15/09/2009 02:14:37 AM
792 Views
completely aside from this argument you guys have here...
- 15/09/2009 05:02:21 AM
761 Views
Interrupter!
- 15/09/2009 06:11:40 AM
691 Views
Re: Interrupter!
- 15/09/2009 06:54:56 AM
793 Views
One brain C4, coming up...
- 15/09/2009 12:00:26 PM
764 Views
The age of the universe is an important point in the creationist argument
- 15/09/2009 05:53:41 PM
768 Views
Exactly. So it was in the wrong column.
- 15/09/2009 07:58:15 PM
727 Views
what I think has been lost in the debate is it looks like it will be a good movie
- 15/09/2009 08:14:04 PM
790 Views
Um.
- 14/09/2009 11:28:28 PM
841 Views
LOL
- 15/09/2009 09:29:16 PM
776 Views
Really? Because this was a rather atypical debate, honestly.
- 15/09/2009 09:43:13 PM
692 Views
Well, I can pretend if you want me to
- 15/09/2009 10:07:59 PM
1227 Views
- 15/09/2009 10:07:59 PM
1227 Views
I happen to find it all extremely interesting
- 15/09/2009 10:23:19 PM
715 Views
There are some places you can go that discuss the creationist ideas
- 15/09/2009 10:58:25 PM
860 Views

*NM*