Of course, if you will admit that the Bible is a flawed document and you're willing to disregard Leviticus 18:22 and Romans 1:27, then you don't have a problem. You resist this, however, and therefore you continue in a hypocritical position.
I do believe he would agree to consider the Bible "flawed" in the sense that verses can be overruled by other verses, or even by general principles that aren't directly related to the point. The Bible really does not provide much direct ammunition to people wanting to defend gay rights or the equal value of gay relationships, but if you look at it the way Danny seems to - regarding it not so much as "flawed", but rather as a mosaic of texts that can contradict each other on some points, and which become religious truth only when taken as a whole (and hence, inevitably, interpreted) - one can refuse to heed the anti-gay verses. Without rejecting the Bible, or even just parts of it.
Presbyterian Church (USA) passes Amendment 10-A.
- 11/05/2011 05:39:29 PM
1457 Views
*NM*
What's the language? Did they at least TRY to give a doctrinal justification?
- 12/05/2011 02:10:46 AM
1036 Views
Thank you for that rousing argument against married priests.
- 12/05/2011 03:36:51 AM
938 Views
Why ARE you letting women into the priesthood?
- 12/05/2011 04:16:50 AM
881 Views
Because Episcopalians don't listen to the Bible much.
- 12/05/2011 05:47:03 AM
819 Views
That's just fine as far as I'm concerned
- 12/05/2011 02:23:44 PM
843 Views
Yes, I suppose a church could go that route.
- 14/05/2011 07:38:02 AM
792 Views
I'm not attempting to impose a dichotomy on the Bible.
- 14/05/2011 03:25:30 PM
865 Views
I don't even know what following the Bible in its entirety means.
- 14/05/2011 09:09:10 PM
1032 Views
As an exercise, I tried to think of how I would justify allowing homosexuals as clergy.
- 14/05/2011 04:19:43 PM
851 Views
Thanks (I'm actually OK with women priests though).
- 12/05/2011 07:09:11 AM
920 Views
There's ample precedent for female religious leaders, even within the bible.
- 12/05/2011 06:51:05 AM
962 Views
Since when is Moses' society the be-all end all?
- 12/05/2011 07:12:41 PM
822 Views
Since never, which is why I referenced five other eras you completely ignored.
- 14/05/2011 01:11:30 AM
926 Views
They did so, via negativa.
- 12/05/2011 04:22:17 PM
972 Views
Sorry for the delay, particularly since it looks like I'll be spending a fair amount of time here.
- 14/05/2011 12:31:33 AM
783 Views
Your church has a constitution?!
- 12/05/2011 03:36:41 AM
846 Views
My Church has a congress! 
*NM*
- 12/05/2011 03:37:52 AM
411 Views
*NM*
- 12/05/2011 03:37:52 AM
411 Views
Haha no way! *NM*
- 12/05/2011 03:46:32 AM
368 Views
Well, we have one group of laity and one of bishops, so it is only mildy utter chaos. 
*NM*
- 12/05/2011 05:51:09 AM
405 Views
*NM*
- 12/05/2011 05:51:09 AM
405 Views
I'm happy to hear this, personally. I also wonder how you reconcile this with the Bible.
- 12/05/2011 04:11:31 AM
1030 Views
Every direct reference to homosexuality in the Bible is a reference to rape.
- 12/05/2011 04:12:43 PM
861 Views
Every single word that you wrote in your response is complete bullshit.
- 12/05/2011 05:50:07 PM
992 Views
Knock off your eisegesis, try some exegesis
- 12/05/2011 07:02:45 PM
904 Views
I'm trying to figure out just what your "gifts" are, because I don't see any.
- 12/05/2011 07:30:39 PM
876 Views
There are cases in which hypocrisy is far better than the alternatives.
- 12/05/2011 10:04:32 PM
949 Views
Hypocrisy is better than, say, setting gays on fire, yes.
- 12/05/2011 10:10:40 PM
924 Views
My statement is that, from a pragmatic point of view, hypocrisy shouldn't be discouraged too much.
- 13/05/2011 10:05:39 PM
939 Views
Oh, is that how we're playing this, then?
- 13/05/2011 06:29:31 PM
883 Views
I'm not playing. I'm pointing out some glaring errors on your part.
- 13/05/2011 07:25:08 PM
782 Views
Danny will correct me if I'm wrong, but...
- 13/05/2011 09:55:14 PM
983 Views
The Bible says what it says. The problem... people like to tell us just what else it's saying.
- 13/05/2011 05:31:29 PM
849 Views
You don't reconcile... you pick the parts you like and adjust the rest to suit you.
- 13/05/2011 09:33:54 PM
774 Views
Another example...
- 12/05/2011 09:19:52 AM
773 Views
If you claim to follow the entire Bible, then you are completely correct.
- 12/05/2011 06:04:38 PM
770 Views
On the contrary, this move will take some butts out of the seats.
- 12/05/2011 07:16:22 PM
822 Views
We both know that isn't the case
- 12/05/2011 07:55:41 PM
917 Views
Cool cool. I have a question on a semi-related note, about Protestant Gospels
- 12/05/2011 05:33:49 PM
886 Views
No Protestant denomination has added so much as a word to the Bible
- 12/05/2011 05:58:16 PM
757 Views
So, everyone hates Judith, then?
- 12/05/2011 06:40:11 PM
839 Views
The Catholics and Eastern Orthodox Churches accept Judith as part of Scripture.
- 12/05/2011 07:51:27 PM
790 Views
Does the Eastern Orthodox Church also segregate deuterocanonical works like Roman Catholicism does?
- 14/05/2011 02:19:03 AM
1099 Views
The Eastern Church bases everything on the Septuagint.
- 14/05/2011 02:34:41 AM
847 Views
That sounds appealing, and makes sense.
- 14/05/2011 02:44:56 AM
859 Views
Oh, I just enjoy calling Protestants "heretics" to remind them not everyone agrees with them.
- 14/05/2011 03:25:42 AM
811 Views
Re: Cool cool. I have a question on a semi-related note, about Protestant Gospels
- 12/05/2011 08:52:48 PM
825 Views
The NIV is terrible. The NASB has the best translation I have found (of the NT, at least).
- 12/05/2011 10:43:58 PM
970 Views
I find this really weird, to be honest
- 13/05/2011 05:48:28 AM
856 Views
Well, it wasn't just Athanasius. But yes, we are lucky in that respect. *NM*
- 13/05/2011 06:32:48 AM
346 Views
Athanasius's list reflected the victory of Pauline Christianity
- 13/05/2011 02:52:53 PM
795 Views
There's a school of thought that says that's a strong vindication of Athanasius. 
- 14/05/2011 02:37:49 AM
751 Views
- 14/05/2011 02:37:49 AM
751 Views