Active Users:935 Time:03/08/2026 06:04:26 AM
Natural selection Bramhodoulos Send a noteboard - 06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM
Hey folks, I have a question about natural selection: what is it?

No, this is not another evolution vs. creation post (at least, that's not my intent), nor is it me proclaiming I don't believe in NS.
In fact the type of creationism I favor makes heavy use of natural selection to account for the variety within species or groups of species.

Recently however I've been reading another book and it discussed natural selection in a philosophical way, showing that there are multiple ways to define NS and all of them were unscientific.

I found that rather strange, since obviously we can see that some individuals or some species can live on while others go extinct. Since they are not actively selected by an outside intelligence (like man or God or aliens) it would be oke to say that "nature selects".

Now I will not repeat his arguments here, for that may put you in a frame of mind about how to define NS, rahter I'd like you guys to give me your best shot of defining NS and then I'll see if his arguments are still valid when applied to your definitions :)

One more thing about what I meant with "scientific", here I mean that it is (a theory or hypothesis that is) falsifiable (Popper).
Reply to message
Natural selection - 06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM 1331 Views
selection for suitability - 06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM 966 Views
Thanks for your responce - 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM 1097 Views
I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it: - 06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM 1051 Views
Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM 1054 Views
Yes it can - 06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM 892 Views
But how? - 06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM 1111 Views
Okay, I think I see what you're saying - 08/08/2011 05:30:43 PM 900 Views
Close - 08/08/2011 05:41:46 PM 1153 Views
Re: Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM 1135 Views
I'm not sure I understand you - 06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM 1044 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies. - 06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM 1098 Views
Then it is still a tautology - 06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM 1110 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations. - 06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM 1153 Views
Maybe... - 07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM 1013 Views
As I understand it - 06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM 964 Views
Better... - 06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM 960 Views
Actually - 06/08/2011 10:13:51 PM 1079 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 10:37:33 PM 1219 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 11:38:52 PM 1127 Views
Oeh - 07/08/2011 01:54:19 PM 964 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM 1058 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 07:08:25 PM 1056 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 07/08/2011 12:46:23 AM 1028 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify... - 06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM 1067 Views
The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM 1094 Views
Re: The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM 1065 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question. - 06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM 1106 Views
TalkOrigins addresses this at length. - 06/08/2011 11:14:52 PM 1138 Views
Not very much, but interesting none the less - 06/08/2011 11:38:36 PM 1142 Views
Re: Natural selection - 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM 1074 Views
Thanks a lot - 07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM 1194 Views
2 things - 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM 946 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM 1156 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM 998 Views
My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM 1072 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM 964 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM 1131 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 07:02:27 PM 1000 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 09:09:57 PM 1089 Views

Reply to Message