Active Users:1405 Time:01/05/2026 11:12:34 PM
Natural selection Bramhodoulos Send a noteboard - 06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM
Hey folks, I have a question about natural selection: what is it?

No, this is not another evolution vs. creation post (at least, that's not my intent), nor is it me proclaiming I don't believe in NS.
In fact the type of creationism I favor makes heavy use of natural selection to account for the variety within species or groups of species.

Recently however I've been reading another book and it discussed natural selection in a philosophical way, showing that there are multiple ways to define NS and all of them were unscientific.

I found that rather strange, since obviously we can see that some individuals or some species can live on while others go extinct. Since they are not actively selected by an outside intelligence (like man or God or aliens) it would be oke to say that "nature selects".

Now I will not repeat his arguments here, for that may put you in a frame of mind about how to define NS, rahter I'd like you guys to give me your best shot of defining NS and then I'll see if his arguments are still valid when applied to your definitions :)

One more thing about what I meant with "scientific", here I mean that it is (a theory or hypothesis that is) falsifiable (Popper).
Reply to message
Natural selection - 06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM 1269 Views
selection for suitability - 06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM 915 Views
Thanks for your responce - 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM 1038 Views
I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it: - 06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM 986 Views
Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM 998 Views
Yes it can - 06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM 836 Views
But how? - 06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM 1060 Views
Okay, I think I see what you're saying - 08/08/2011 05:30:43 PM 848 Views
Close - 08/08/2011 05:41:46 PM 1087 Views
Re: Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM 1079 Views
I'm not sure I understand you - 06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM 983 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies. - 06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM 1013 Views
Then it is still a tautology - 06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM 1047 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations. - 06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM 1090 Views
Maybe... - 07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM 966 Views
As I understand it - 06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM 917 Views
Better... - 06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM 907 Views
Actually - 06/08/2011 10:13:51 PM 1024 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 10:37:33 PM 1167 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 11:38:52 PM 1081 Views
Oeh - 07/08/2011 01:54:19 PM 908 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM 1010 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 07:08:25 PM 995 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 07/08/2011 12:46:23 AM 982 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify... - 06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM 1005 Views
The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM 1039 Views
Re: The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM 1009 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question. - 06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM 1049 Views
TalkOrigins addresses this at length. - 06/08/2011 11:14:52 PM 1074 Views
Not very much, but interesting none the less - 06/08/2011 11:38:36 PM 1085 Views
Re: Natural selection - 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM 1012 Views
Thanks a lot - 07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM 1141 Views
2 things - 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM 890 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM 1114 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM 944 Views
My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM 1005 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM 911 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM 1064 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 07:02:27 PM 943 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 09:09:57 PM 1038 Views

Reply to Message