Active Users:677 Time:05/08/2025 03:21:57 PM
Re: Natural selection Night Walker Send a noteboard - 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM
NS is the process through which evolution acts. The process itself is governed by things like biological fitness. Fitness is determined by the genotype and phenotype of an individual to produce viable offspring. NS requires a selection pressure to “do its job”.

I think what you are having an issue with (based on reading other posts) is that it is impossible for us to know which trait will be beneficial to a given species in the wild before it happens. In order to test something like this we would have to have a static environment which is hard to come by. However some have managed it. Have you ever heard of the guppy experiment? That experiment shows how selection pressure causes natural selection for a certain trait and thus can alter the gene pool (and cause micro-evolution). In this environment you can then hypothesize about what traits will enhance ones fitness given the selection pressure. Thus you have tested NS.

Edit: I wanted to add that NS is not random like most people think it is. The random portion about NS is finding out which individuals, if any, have the "right" combo of genes for a given selection pressure. Thus if a selection pressure is great enough or radical enough some species will not have the "right" genes and go extinct. NS is very specific in selecting the animals in a species with certain traits.
Guppies
This message last edited by Night Walker on 07/08/2011 at 03:08:17 AM
Reply to message
Natural selection - 06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM 1122 Views
selection for suitability - 06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM 766 Views
Thanks for your responce - 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM 880 Views
I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it: - 06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM 830 Views
Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM 821 Views
Yes it can - 06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM 684 Views
But how? - 06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM 885 Views
Okay, I think I see what you're saying - 08/08/2011 05:30:43 PM 695 Views
Close - 08/08/2011 05:41:46 PM 901 Views
Re: Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM 905 Views
I'm not sure I understand you - 06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM 809 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies. - 06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM 828 Views
Then it is still a tautology - 06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM 839 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations. - 06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM 940 Views
Maybe... - 07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM 788 Views
As I understand it - 06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM 755 Views
Better... - 06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM 739 Views
Actually - 06/08/2011 10:13:51 PM 830 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 10:37:33 PM 968 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 11:38:52 PM 897 Views
Oeh - 07/08/2011 01:54:19 PM 745 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM 835 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 07:08:25 PM 839 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 07/08/2011 12:46:23 AM 838 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify... - 06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM 856 Views
The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM 868 Views
Re: The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM 841 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question. - 06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM 862 Views
TalkOrigins addresses this at length. - 06/08/2011 11:14:52 PM 922 Views
Not very much, but interesting none the less - 06/08/2011 11:38:36 PM 910 Views
Re: Natural selection - 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM 843 Views
Thanks a lot - 07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM 986 Views
2 things - 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM 743 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM 958 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM 781 Views
My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM 826 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM 753 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM 912 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 07:02:27 PM 753 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 09:09:57 PM 878 Views

Reply to Message