Active Users:795 Time:17/09/2026 10:13:45 AM
Re: Natural selection Night Walker Send a noteboard - 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM
NS is the process through which evolution acts. The process itself is governed by things like biological fitness. Fitness is determined by the genotype and phenotype of an individual to produce viable offspring. NS requires a selection pressure to “do its job”.

I think what you are having an issue with (based on reading other posts) is that it is impossible for us to know which trait will be beneficial to a given species in the wild before it happens. In order to test something like this we would have to have a static environment which is hard to come by. However some have managed it. Have you ever heard of the guppy experiment? That experiment shows how selection pressure causes natural selection for a certain trait and thus can alter the gene pool (and cause micro-evolution). In this environment you can then hypothesize about what traits will enhance ones fitness given the selection pressure. Thus you have tested NS.

Edit: I wanted to add that NS is not random like most people think it is. The random portion about NS is finding out which individuals, if any, have the "right" combo of genes for a given selection pressure. Thus if a selection pressure is great enough or radical enough some species will not have the "right" genes and go extinct. NS is very specific in selecting the animals in a species with certain traits.
Guppies
This message last edited by Night Walker on 07/08/2011 at 03:08:17 AM
Reply to message
Natural selection - 06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM 1360 Views
selection for suitability - 06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM 994 Views
Thanks for your responce - 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM 1131 Views
I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it: - 06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM 1080 Views
Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM 1085 Views
Yes it can - 06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM 919 Views
But how? - 06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM 1138 Views
Okay, I think I see what you're saying - 08/08/2011 05:30:43 PM 930 Views
Close - 08/08/2011 05:41:46 PM 1184 Views
Re: Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM 1168 Views
I'm not sure I understand you - 06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM 1078 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies. - 06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM 1126 Views
Then it is still a tautology - 06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM 1137 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations. - 06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM 1184 Views
Maybe... - 07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM 1041 Views
As I understand it - 06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM 991 Views
Better... - 06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM 988 Views
Actually - 06/08/2011 10:13:51 PM 1108 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 10:37:33 PM 1248 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 11:38:52 PM 1157 Views
Oeh - 07/08/2011 01:54:19 PM 992 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM 1083 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 07:08:25 PM 1080 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 07/08/2011 12:46:23 AM 1052 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify... - 06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM 1098 Views
The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM 1121 Views
Re: The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM 1091 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question. - 06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM 1134 Views
TalkOrigins addresses this at length. - 06/08/2011 11:14:52 PM 1165 Views
Not very much, but interesting none the less - 06/08/2011 11:38:36 PM 1172 Views
Re: Natural selection - 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM 1103 Views
Thanks a lot - 07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM 1222 Views
2 things - 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM 971 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM 1183 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM 1025 Views
My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM 1106 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM 993 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM 1159 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 07:02:27 PM 1026 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 09:09:57 PM 1115 Views

Reply to Message