Active Users:308 Time:02/05/2024 08:54:21 AM
I don't really have a problem with this Isaac Send a noteboard - 25/08/2011 09:03:55 PM
The question is optional, and Elmhurst is a private school, though it probably receives some sort of tax funding. Whichever, I would not morally object to some rich old female scientist endowing a scholarship for girls going into science. Which sets a precedent for me in terms of moral judgment. Legally I can't see it being my business unless taxes pay for it, morally I recognize grounds even in modern times for directing aid to someone on grounds other than strictly scholastic merit, so I don't think orientation would be an unfair one. That said, we are going to have to revisit a lot of this stuff eventually, we'd all be outraged if the KKK offered a white male only scholarship, fundamentally there's little difference here. A private entity has setup a scholarship that can bypass a scholastically superior student for another on grounds of a trait, and that's a potentially gray area at best, again morally not legally speaking.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
A fine example of the fuzzy logic of the left - 25/08/2011 06:30:36 PM 958 Views
Personally I still favor demographic blind subsidies as the best route to meritocracy. - 25/08/2011 08:18:20 PM 548 Views
it works for gender as well - 25/08/2011 09:02:58 PM 558 Views
Sure; insert your demographic here. - 26/08/2011 12:51:48 AM 606 Views
Preferential in possible scholarships but not admissions process according to the article - 25/08/2011 10:26:25 PM 459 Views
What's your point? - 26/08/2011 12:54:41 AM 440 Views
There are colleges that don't allow homosexuals - or men, or women for that matter. - 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM 550 Views
Alright then, socially unacceptable. - 26/08/2011 01:00:16 AM 582 Views
Ummm, did you read the article? - 25/08/2011 08:40:46 PM 604 Views
Ah, but you are not reading it either - 25/08/2011 08:53:39 PM 630 Views
But that's just a scholarship. - 25/08/2011 09:34:23 PM 588 Views
it is a scholarship program not a admissions program - 25/08/2011 09:12:47 PM 570 Views
I don't really have a problem with this - 25/08/2011 09:03:55 PM 646 Views
I am not arguing that they shouldn't be allowed to do it - 25/08/2011 09:29:54 PM 474 Views
Fair Enough - 25/08/2011 09:41:25 PM 515 Views
their stated motive was to increase diversity - 25/08/2011 10:09:17 PM 643 Views
One of your lines struck me. - 25/08/2011 10:12:32 PM 614 Views
that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result - 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM 463 Views
That's an interesting point... - 25/08/2011 10:37:37 PM 544 Views
Re: that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result - 25/08/2011 10:55:29 PM 564 Views
It's also worth noting ... - 25/08/2011 11:00:35 PM 448 Views
Wow what a strawman - 25/08/2011 10:23:45 PM 635 Views
yes to bad none of that address the point I was making which would make your argument a strawman - 25/08/2011 10:40:01 PM 423 Views
No I do not believe they are needed, nor do I believe they should be desired - 25/08/2011 10:47:51 PM 613 Views
so you don't disagree with me or you do? - 25/08/2011 11:47:05 PM 561 Views
Ridiculous. Everyone knows conservatives are incapable of creativity. - 25/08/2011 11:12:10 PM 436 Views
are they going to make students prove they are GLBT? - 25/08/2011 11:36:58 PM 506 Views
I think it's less a failing of the "left"... - 26/08/2011 03:25:42 AM 561 Views
I agree there is a lot of fuzzy logic on the right as well - 26/08/2011 02:41:03 PM 502 Views
*nod* I don't deny that it's a problem - 26/08/2011 04:26:56 PM 616 Views
a question for you... - 26/08/2011 08:08:10 PM 656 Views

Reply to Message