Active Users:578 Time:16/04/2026 08:17:46 PM
it is a scholarship program not a admissions program random thoughts Send a noteboard - 25/08/2011 09:12:47 PM
like the article says. It still makes you wonder why they feel the need to increase the number of LGBT students at a liberal arts school in the name of diversity. Is this a group that is being under represented in the liberals arts? I could just be buying in to the stereo type but I would bet against it, I would bet against with a lot of money and bad odds. If what they truly wanted was diversity of thought and ideas wouldn't they look for under represented groups and encourage more of them to enroll instead of just picking the latest Cause Celeb regardless of need? If what they wanted was true diversity of thought they would try and recruit students who wouldn't normally be drawn to a liberal arts university?
Reply to message
A fine example of the fuzzy logic of the left - 25/08/2011 06:30:36 PM 1182 Views
Personally I still favor demographic blind subsidies as the best route to meritocracy. - 25/08/2011 08:18:20 PM 776 Views
it works for gender as well - 25/08/2011 09:02:58 PM 780 Views
Sure; insert your demographic here. - 26/08/2011 12:51:48 AM 837 Views
Preferential in possible scholarships but not admissions process according to the article - 25/08/2011 10:26:25 PM 700 Views
What's your point? - 26/08/2011 12:54:41 AM 650 Views
There are colleges that don't allow homosexuals - or men, or women for that matter. - 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM 767 Views
Alright then, socially unacceptable. - 26/08/2011 01:00:16 AM 789 Views
Ummm, did you read the article? - 25/08/2011 08:40:46 PM 841 Views
Ah, but you are not reading it either - 25/08/2011 08:53:39 PM 813 Views
But that's just a scholarship. - 25/08/2011 09:34:23 PM 797 Views
it is a scholarship program not a admissions program - 25/08/2011 09:12:47 PM 790 Views
I don't really have a problem with this - 25/08/2011 09:03:55 PM 841 Views
I am not arguing that they shouldn't be allowed to do it - 25/08/2011 09:29:54 PM 692 Views
Fair Enough - 25/08/2011 09:41:25 PM 741 Views
their stated motive was to increase diversity - 25/08/2011 10:09:17 PM 850 Views
One of your lines struck me. - 25/08/2011 10:12:32 PM 849 Views
that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result - 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM 676 Views
That's an interesting point... - 25/08/2011 10:37:37 PM 759 Views
Re: that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result - 25/08/2011 10:55:29 PM 789 Views
It's also worth noting ... - 25/08/2011 11:00:35 PM 663 Views
Wow what a strawman - 25/08/2011 10:23:45 PM 859 Views
yes to bad none of that address the point I was making which would make your argument a strawman - 25/08/2011 10:40:01 PM 659 Views
No I do not believe they are needed, nor do I believe they should be desired - 25/08/2011 10:47:51 PM 824 Views
so you don't disagree with me or you do? - 25/08/2011 11:47:05 PM 793 Views
Ridiculous. Everyone knows conservatives are incapable of creativity. - 25/08/2011 11:12:10 PM 656 Views
are they going to make students prove they are GLBT? - 25/08/2011 11:36:58 PM 708 Views
I think it's less a failing of the "left"... - 26/08/2011 03:25:42 AM 783 Views
I agree there is a lot of fuzzy logic on the right as well - 26/08/2011 02:41:03 PM 719 Views
*nod* I don't deny that it's a problem - 26/08/2011 04:26:56 PM 830 Views
a question for you... - 26/08/2011 08:08:10 PM 939 Views

Reply to Message