Active Users:446 Time:22/08/2026 03:12:14 PM
Wow what a strawman Roland00 Send a noteboard - 25/08/2011 10:23:45 PM
1) Only 1 university has done this. Thus you can't really argue this is a trend
2) This is a private organization since it is a private school, thus no state funds are directly funding it.
3) They are doing it for it is a receipt of success, via standing out. They are the only university in the US to do this, thus they are standing out via asking this question. It is a "signaling mechanism"
a) They are a private university who are competing for "talent," trying to get wealthy kids to go to their institution. Even if the kid is straight he may fell more likely to go to this school for it is inclusive, and he/she may see the school as more liberal, modern, and cosmopolitan. Or a closeted gay boy/girl who is still stuck in a hell that is high school may feel safe.
When you only have 3,400 undergrads and 230 grads students, an increase of 200 hundred students is an 6% increase in revenue. (And with tuition costing 30k a year, 200 additional students is 6 million more revenue a year.)
b) It is another way for the school to recruit funds from private donors/past alumni. Look how liberal, modern, cosmopolitan we are.

When you are one of many thousands of organizations, some times it pays to stand out. Elmhurst needs to be peoples 1st pick to succeed, no one spends 30k a year on a university to be a 2nd choice pick. Elmhurst needs stories to tell to get people excited to be there besides them being a liberal art school, and only 30 mins from downtown chicago and 25 mins away from Chicago O Hare.
Reply to message
A fine example of the fuzzy logic of the left - 25/08/2011 06:30:36 PM 1234 Views
Personally I still favor demographic blind subsidies as the best route to meritocracy. - 25/08/2011 08:18:20 PM 825 Views
it works for gender as well - 25/08/2011 09:02:58 PM 835 Views
Sure; insert your demographic here. - 26/08/2011 12:51:48 AM 888 Views
Preferential in possible scholarships but not admissions process according to the article - 25/08/2011 10:26:25 PM 746 Views
What's your point? - 26/08/2011 12:54:41 AM 700 Views
There are colleges that don't allow homosexuals - or men, or women for that matter. - 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM 816 Views
Alright then, socially unacceptable. - 26/08/2011 01:00:16 AM 840 Views
Ummm, did you read the article? - 25/08/2011 08:40:46 PM 889 Views
Ah, but you are not reading it either - 25/08/2011 08:53:39 PM 864 Views
But that's just a scholarship. - 25/08/2011 09:34:23 PM 846 Views
it is a scholarship program not a admissions program - 25/08/2011 09:12:47 PM 837 Views
I don't really have a problem with this - 25/08/2011 09:03:55 PM 883 Views
I am not arguing that they shouldn't be allowed to do it - 25/08/2011 09:29:54 PM 740 Views
Fair Enough - 25/08/2011 09:41:25 PM 793 Views
their stated motive was to increase diversity - 25/08/2011 10:09:17 PM 905 Views
One of your lines struck me. - 25/08/2011 10:12:32 PM 902 Views
that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result - 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM 726 Views
That's an interesting point... - 25/08/2011 10:37:37 PM 819 Views
Re: that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result - 25/08/2011 10:55:29 PM 832 Views
It's also worth noting ... - 25/08/2011 11:00:35 PM 715 Views
Wow what a strawman - 25/08/2011 10:23:45 PM 908 Views
yes to bad none of that address the point I was making which would make your argument a strawman - 25/08/2011 10:40:01 PM 718 Views
No I do not believe they are needed, nor do I believe they should be desired - 25/08/2011 10:47:51 PM 872 Views
so you don't disagree with me or you do? - 25/08/2011 11:47:05 PM 845 Views
Ridiculous. Everyone knows conservatives are incapable of creativity. - 25/08/2011 11:12:10 PM 703 Views
are they going to make students prove they are GLBT? - 25/08/2011 11:36:58 PM 757 Views
I think it's less a failing of the "left"... - 26/08/2011 03:25:42 AM 830 Views
I agree there is a lot of fuzzy logic on the right as well - 26/08/2011 02:41:03 PM 765 Views
*nod* I don't deny that it's a problem - 26/08/2011 04:26:56 PM 876 Views
a question for you... - 26/08/2011 08:08:10 PM 998 Views

Reply to Message