Active Users:446 Time:22/08/2026 03:12:13 PM
There are colleges that don't allow homosexuals - or men, or women for that matter. Legolas Send a noteboard - 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM
And not just because the phenomenon you describe results in a lot of those poor whites you reference refusing to support or even actively opposing social empowerment because they know it won't help them anyway. I've often accused the power brokers of engaging in divide and conquer tactics, but the fact is minority preferences and quotas do much of the job for them. Nothing better demonstrates that than the fact a college application question about sexual orientation would be unthinkable if it were meant to discriminate AGAINST homosexuals but is somehow acceptable if it seeks to discriminate against EVERYONE ELSE (as such preferential treatment effectively does).

So clearly it's not "unthinkable".
Reply to message
A fine example of the fuzzy logic of the left - 25/08/2011 06:30:36 PM 1234 Views
Personally I still favor demographic blind subsidies as the best route to meritocracy. - 25/08/2011 08:18:20 PM 825 Views
it works for gender as well - 25/08/2011 09:02:58 PM 835 Views
Sure; insert your demographic here. - 26/08/2011 12:51:48 AM 888 Views
Preferential in possible scholarships but not admissions process according to the article - 25/08/2011 10:26:25 PM 746 Views
What's your point? - 26/08/2011 12:54:41 AM 700 Views
There are colleges that don't allow homosexuals - or men, or women for that matter. - 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM 816 Views
Alright then, socially unacceptable. - 26/08/2011 01:00:16 AM 840 Views
Ummm, did you read the article? - 25/08/2011 08:40:46 PM 889 Views
Ah, but you are not reading it either - 25/08/2011 08:53:39 PM 864 Views
But that's just a scholarship. - 25/08/2011 09:34:23 PM 846 Views
it is a scholarship program not a admissions program - 25/08/2011 09:12:47 PM 837 Views
I don't really have a problem with this - 25/08/2011 09:03:55 PM 883 Views
I am not arguing that they shouldn't be allowed to do it - 25/08/2011 09:29:54 PM 740 Views
Fair Enough - 25/08/2011 09:41:25 PM 793 Views
their stated motive was to increase diversity - 25/08/2011 10:09:17 PM 905 Views
One of your lines struck me. - 25/08/2011 10:12:32 PM 902 Views
that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result - 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM 726 Views
That's an interesting point... - 25/08/2011 10:37:37 PM 819 Views
Re: that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result - 25/08/2011 10:55:29 PM 832 Views
It's also worth noting ... - 25/08/2011 11:00:35 PM 715 Views
Wow what a strawman - 25/08/2011 10:23:45 PM 907 Views
yes to bad none of that address the point I was making which would make your argument a strawman - 25/08/2011 10:40:01 PM 718 Views
No I do not believe they are needed, nor do I believe they should be desired - 25/08/2011 10:47:51 PM 872 Views
so you don't disagree with me or you do? - 25/08/2011 11:47:05 PM 845 Views
Ridiculous. Everyone knows conservatives are incapable of creativity. - 25/08/2011 11:12:10 PM 703 Views
are they going to make students prove they are GLBT? - 25/08/2011 11:36:58 PM 757 Views
I think it's less a failing of the "left"... - 26/08/2011 03:25:42 AM 830 Views
I agree there is a lot of fuzzy logic on the right as well - 26/08/2011 02:41:03 PM 765 Views
*nod* I don't deny that it's a problem - 26/08/2011 04:26:56 PM 876 Views
a question for you... - 26/08/2011 08:08:10 PM 998 Views

Reply to Message