Active Users:543 Time:16/04/2026 08:25:08 PM
One of your lines struck me. Nate Send a noteboard - 25/08/2011 10:12:32 PM
Maybe if they had more intelligence and less ideology they would be held in higher regard.


As an outside, non-American observer, I admit that I feel this is absolutely true of the entire US political system in general, not just the left or the right.

In my ideal world, the widening gulf between the political/ideological poles in the United States would drive more and more voters not to either side, but to the moderate centre, as more and more voters would feel estranged from the rhetoric and the bickering and the posturing. That's what happened to me, in a way. As a younger voter (ten years ago) I leaned quite definitely to the left. As I grew older and moved to a conservative area of my country, I learned advantages to those ideas as well. When the two sides argue it only serves to make me more moderate, because I can see good ideas in both ideals.

I'm not sure if hoping for that in the US is a waste of dreaming or not. On the one hand, there are a lot of people yelling at each other. On the other hand, the idealogues always shout louder than any of the moderates, no matter how many moderates there are, especially when the cameras are rolling and their fan bases are listening.
Warder to starry_nite

Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
Reply to message
A fine example of the fuzzy logic of the left - 25/08/2011 06:30:36 PM 1182 Views
Personally I still favor demographic blind subsidies as the best route to meritocracy. - 25/08/2011 08:18:20 PM 776 Views
it works for gender as well - 25/08/2011 09:02:58 PM 781 Views
Sure; insert your demographic here. - 26/08/2011 12:51:48 AM 838 Views
Preferential in possible scholarships but not admissions process according to the article - 25/08/2011 10:26:25 PM 701 Views
What's your point? - 26/08/2011 12:54:41 AM 651 Views
There are colleges that don't allow homosexuals - or men, or women for that matter. - 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM 768 Views
Alright then, socially unacceptable. - 26/08/2011 01:00:16 AM 790 Views
Ummm, did you read the article? - 25/08/2011 08:40:46 PM 841 Views
Ah, but you are not reading it either - 25/08/2011 08:53:39 PM 813 Views
But that's just a scholarship. - 25/08/2011 09:34:23 PM 797 Views
it is a scholarship program not a admissions program - 25/08/2011 09:12:47 PM 790 Views
I don't really have a problem with this - 25/08/2011 09:03:55 PM 842 Views
I am not arguing that they shouldn't be allowed to do it - 25/08/2011 09:29:54 PM 692 Views
Fair Enough - 25/08/2011 09:41:25 PM 741 Views
their stated motive was to increase diversity - 25/08/2011 10:09:17 PM 851 Views
One of your lines struck me. - 25/08/2011 10:12:32 PM 850 Views
that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result - 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM 676 Views
That's an interesting point... - 25/08/2011 10:37:37 PM 760 Views
Re: that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result - 25/08/2011 10:55:29 PM 790 Views
It's also worth noting ... - 25/08/2011 11:00:35 PM 663 Views
Wow what a strawman - 25/08/2011 10:23:45 PM 860 Views
yes to bad none of that address the point I was making which would make your argument a strawman - 25/08/2011 10:40:01 PM 660 Views
No I do not believe they are needed, nor do I believe they should be desired - 25/08/2011 10:47:51 PM 824 Views
so you don't disagree with me or you do? - 25/08/2011 11:47:05 PM 793 Views
Ridiculous. Everyone knows conservatives are incapable of creativity. - 25/08/2011 11:12:10 PM 656 Views
are they going to make students prove they are GLBT? - 25/08/2011 11:36:58 PM 708 Views
I think it's less a failing of the "left"... - 26/08/2011 03:25:42 AM 784 Views
I agree there is a lot of fuzzy logic on the right as well - 26/08/2011 02:41:03 PM 719 Views
*nod* I don't deny that it's a problem - 26/08/2011 04:26:56 PM 830 Views
a question for you... - 26/08/2011 08:08:10 PM 939 Views

Reply to Message