Active Users:345 Time:02/05/2024 12:56:08 AM
This is a private university, not a state university *NM* Roland00 Send a noteboard - 25/08/2011 10:29:15 PM
But if they said they were doing it in the name of diversity I would think they were nuts. As I said to Issac, it isn't the scholarship I object to it is the stated rationale.

Oh and yes plenty of liberals not mention independents and no few conservatives criticize BYU for their policies. I know I do but it so far it hasn't illustrated a point I was trying to make so I havn't mentioned it.
Reply to message
A fine example of the fuzzy logic of the left - 25/08/2011 06:30:36 PM 958 Views
Personally I still favor demographic blind subsidies as the best route to meritocracy. - 25/08/2011 08:18:20 PM 547 Views
it works for gender as well - 25/08/2011 09:02:58 PM 558 Views
Sure; insert your demographic here. - 26/08/2011 12:51:48 AM 606 Views
Preferential in possible scholarships but not admissions process according to the article - 25/08/2011 10:26:25 PM 459 Views
What's your point? - 26/08/2011 12:54:41 AM 440 Views
There are colleges that don't allow homosexuals - or men, or women for that matter. - 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM 550 Views
Alright then, socially unacceptable. - 26/08/2011 01:00:16 AM 581 Views
Ummm, did you read the article? - 25/08/2011 08:40:46 PM 603 Views
Ah, but you are not reading it either - 25/08/2011 08:53:39 PM 629 Views
But that's just a scholarship. - 25/08/2011 09:34:23 PM 587 Views
so you would OK if the only offered it to straight students? *NM* - 25/08/2011 09:50:44 PM 211 Views
You do realize that there are indeed universities refusing admission to gay students? - 25/08/2011 10:02:41 PM 452 Views
I would have no problem with a LGBT only school as long as it didn't take state money - 25/08/2011 10:27:48 PM 512 Views
This is a private university, not a state university *NM* - 25/08/2011 10:29:15 PM 245 Views
it is a scholarship program not a admissions program - 25/08/2011 09:12:47 PM 569 Views
I don't really have a problem with this - 25/08/2011 09:03:55 PM 645 Views
I am not arguing that they shouldn't be allowed to do it - 25/08/2011 09:29:54 PM 474 Views
Fair Enough - 25/08/2011 09:41:25 PM 514 Views
their stated motive was to increase diversity - 25/08/2011 10:09:17 PM 643 Views
One of your lines struck me. - 25/08/2011 10:12:32 PM 614 Views
that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result - 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM 462 Views
That's an interesting point... - 25/08/2011 10:37:37 PM 544 Views
Re: that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result - 25/08/2011 10:55:29 PM 564 Views
It's also worth noting ... - 25/08/2011 11:00:35 PM 447 Views
Wow what a strawman - 25/08/2011 10:23:45 PM 634 Views
yes to bad none of that address the point I was making which would make your argument a strawman - 25/08/2011 10:40:01 PM 422 Views
No I do not believe they are needed, nor do I believe they should be desired - 25/08/2011 10:47:51 PM 612 Views
so you don't disagree with me or you do? - 25/08/2011 11:47:05 PM 560 Views
Ridiculous. Everyone knows conservatives are incapable of creativity. - 25/08/2011 11:12:10 PM 436 Views
are they going to make students prove they are GLBT? - 25/08/2011 11:36:58 PM 505 Views
I think it's less a failing of the "left"... - 26/08/2011 03:25:42 AM 560 Views
I agree there is a lot of fuzzy logic on the right as well - 26/08/2011 02:41:03 PM 501 Views
*nod* I don't deny that it's a problem - 26/08/2011 04:26:56 PM 615 Views
a question for you... - 26/08/2011 08:08:10 PM 654 Views

Reply to Message