.....but I would use the standard of "no doubt" instead of "beyond a reasonable doubt". This means.....DNA, physical evidence, getting caught in the act, video, multiple independent eye-witnesses, etc.
That is why we word the verdict that way. Maybe I am just a coma victim in a hospital some place imagining the whole trial and events leading up to it, in which case the imaginary defendant is not guilty of any crimes against an imaginary victim. Maybe I am a mentally challenged jelly fish creature on a distant planet mistaking an entertainment program for reality. Those are irrefutable doubts, but far from reasonable ones, and should therefore not prevent anyones conviction. David Icke thinks extradimensional lizard people run the world, but his doubt of world leaders very humanity is unreasonable, and so not generally taken seriously.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 22/09/2011 at 10:05:25 PM
i'm proud to live in a country where you can be executed based on circumstantial evidence...
22/09/2011 04:06:07 PM
- 1512 Views
And yet the Supreme Court didn't stop it. You're a lawyer right?
22/09/2011 04:19:05 PM
- 878 Views
Well, that right there was an ignorant thing to say.
22/09/2011 04:32:49 PM
- 942 Views
But they get all the media attention
22/09/2011 04:45:03 PM
- 818 Views
Cameron Todd Willingham is white, and his story is a national one since Perry is running for Pres
23/09/2011 03:41:52 PM
- 686 Views
those numbers are less schocking when you consider that blacks commet a lot more murders *NM*
22/09/2011 05:43:51 PM
- 352 Views
And this is a typically illogical argument.
22/09/2011 11:11:48 PM
- 859 Views
You're kidding, right?
23/09/2011 02:55:44 PM
- 823 Views
Re: You're kidding, right?
23/09/2011 07:36:38 PM
- 836 Views
Juror bias. *NM*
23/09/2011 08:35:10 PM
- 321 Views
Your evidence for that? *NM*
23/09/2011 11:33:58 PM
- 329 Views
Twenty-one years of life in the American South.
24/09/2011 12:40:10 AM
- 777 Views
Of course I'm interested
24/09/2011 04:03:51 AM
- 720 Views
From me being too involved with the subject material. I apologize.
24/09/2011 11:16:06 AM
- 696 Views
While I largely agree with your argument, I agree more with Cannoli on the NAACP.
23/09/2011 07:46:06 PM
- 761 Views
Huh.
22/09/2011 04:47:20 PM
- 883 Views
That jumped out at me too.
22/09/2011 04:50:52 PM
- 807 Views
What really confuses me
22/09/2011 04:58:32 PM
- 758 Views
That's a good question and I really wish it would be addressed.
22/09/2011 05:05:40 PM
- 842 Views
Re: That's a good question and I really wish it would be addressed.
22/09/2011 05:21:59 PM
- 899 Views
If the original trial is shown to be flawed that's supposed to require a new trial.
22/09/2011 08:25:51 PM
- 749 Views
Well...
22/09/2011 05:18:54 PM
- 915 Views
So if I understand you correctly...
22/09/2011 05:23:00 PM
- 854 Views
Yes, that is correct. And proving witness coercion is likely to be difficult if not impossible. *NM*
22/09/2011 05:30:37 PM
- 298 Views
it is only confusing because the evidence isn't really that shaky
22/09/2011 08:54:21 PM
- 806 Views
If I understand the Supreme Court correctly, the reason they denied the stay of execution was
22/09/2011 08:25:14 PM
- 838 Views
I completely support the Death Penalty without question.....
22/09/2011 08:27:54 PM
- 740 Views
Unreasonable doubt is impossible to eliminate.
22/09/2011 09:54:43 PM
- 823 Views
Doubt can be eliminated.....any question about Dalmer?
23/09/2011 01:00:52 PM
- 871 Views
Maybe he was framed by an enemy, government conspiracy or aliens.
23/09/2011 01:54:21 PM
- 760 Views
Jigga what?
*NM*
23/09/2011 03:36:07 PM
- 427 Views

"I do not know if I was then a man dreaming I was a butterfly or am now a butterfly..."
23/09/2011 06:50:34 PM
- 742 Views
Circumstantial evidence is not, I believe, a bar to conviction.
22/09/2011 09:43:56 PM
- 712 Views
Regarding the salvation thing, that is an argument FOR the death penalty, in my mind.
22/09/2011 11:37:16 PM
- 782 Views
That motive is seflish and thus fatal.
23/09/2011 01:17:00 AM
- 720 Views
Bullshit
25/09/2011 03:53:05 AM
- 953 Views
Where do YOU get the idea that imperfect contrition is good enough?
25/09/2011 02:29:18 PM
- 1242 Views
Thank God you're not an evangelist.
23/09/2011 02:59:06 PM
- 755 Views
And I pity the souls you have ministered to. They're in for a rude shock at their judgement
25/09/2011 04:01:05 AM
- 743 Views
lol roman catholicism *NM*
25/09/2011 04:39:55 AM
- 302 Views
Not just Roman Catholics, y'know, everyone who thinks God was not BSing about judgement.
25/09/2011 09:47:12 PM
- 802 Views
lol hellfire and brimstone *NM*
26/09/2011 12:12:28 AM
- 302 Views
I suppose in a consequences free world everything is a source of amusement.
26/09/2011 12:33:14 AM
- 945 Views
You really don't understand irony, do you? Particularly as it applies to your post about this case.
22/09/2011 11:26:49 PM
- 838 Views
.
23/09/2011 08:21:38 AM
- 784 Views
A list of anecdotal wrongs does not prove anything. If convictions can be wrong, so can exonerations *NM*
25/09/2011 04:03:26 AM
- 304 Views
sorry if i don't have time to link to every
thing i've read on the subject
23/09/2011 02:54:50 PM
- 902 Views

Well I would think you would have picked an article that offers some iota of proof of his innocence.
25/09/2011 04:14:45 AM
- 832 Views
Well, I wouldn't call eyewitness accounts circumstancial evidence.
23/09/2011 11:45:48 PM
- 760 Views
Nor would I, but I've heard that lawyers say, "an eye witness is the worst witness you can have."
25/09/2011 03:23:53 PM
- 758 Views