Active Users:441 Time:18/09/2025 08:25:46 PM
You're really not going to make sense of this if you keep mashing everything together. Legolas Send a noteboard - 27/07/2012 08:59:35 PM
The IOC is one thing. The Greek OC is another thing. They both have their priorities, their history, and their reputation to think about, and based on that they take decisions that may or may not align. This would have been an entirely different story if the IOC - the organization that can actually be blamed for the things you list in that paragraph - had been the one to pronounce the ban. But it wasn't. The Greek OC took this decision - plenty of OCs in other countries wouldn't have, that's for sure, and the IOC's not stupid enough that they'd have done it themselves. No doubt part of the Greek OC's motivation was their view of the Olympic spirit and racism not belonging on the Games; and no doubt another part was simply that they wanted to protect Greece's reputation, which right now is in a dubious state both in general and more specifically in sports (having two of their biggest Athens 2004 heroes stripped of their medals for doping was painful to say the least, and Athens 2004 is rapidly becoming proverbial for how disastrous Olympics can be when you do them wrong).

Sorry but this PC run amok and this young lady should not have all her hard work sacrificed on the altar of false tolerance. The whole “I tolerate anything but intolerance argument is one of the dumbest arguments I have seen intelligent people make.

I actually agree with you, but as long as selection or non-selection is up to the national OCs, I think this decision was inevitable under the circumstances. Which is one of the reasons why I don't think it should be up to the national OCs.
I guess you can make the argument that the Greeks have the right to ban anyone they choose but by the same token I have the right to point out that they are small minded morons how have no tolerance for people who don't toe the line on political opinion. It is a two edged sword you know.

Yes, but if they hadn't banned her they'd have had far more people thinking bad of them.
This message last edited by Legolas on 27/07/2012 at 08:59:54 PM
Reply to message
Am I the only one who thinks Voula Papachristou should not have been kicked out of the Olympics? - 25/07/2012 10:55:19 PM 1327 Views
Being on a country's Olympic team is a privilege, not a right - 25/07/2012 11:00:24 PM 818 Views
So banning blacks would be cool if it was legal in that country? - 25/07/2012 11:08:52 PM 972 Views
If that's how the country wants to run itself - 25/07/2012 11:13:04 PM 845 Views
The IOC can ban nations from participating for that sort of stunt. - 25/07/2012 11:33:23 PM 995 Views
So that excuses thought control? - 25/07/2012 11:49:58 PM 898 Views
If Hitler could let Jesse Owens run... - 25/07/2012 11:07:19 PM 1041 Views
Yes. Political power should not be used to enforce morals. - 25/07/2012 11:53:19 PM 777 Views
The national Olympic Committees aren't the government. - 26/07/2012 12:02:43 AM 763 Views
Even worse. - 26/07/2012 12:08:05 AM 805 Views
Erm - 26/07/2012 12:29:32 AM 842 Views
I fail to see how the whole team would be thrown out. - 26/07/2012 12:41:16 AM 839 Views
Because the IOC throws them out if the national government interferes in the national committe. *NM* - 26/07/2012 12:43:39 AM 448 Views
Well, that's absurd. - 26/07/2012 01:09:41 AM 918 Views
As with most things, I doubt the practice matches the theory - 26/07/2012 10:45:55 AM 817 Views
Africans != illegals - 25/07/2012 11:19:32 PM 874 Views
Specious reasoning. - 26/07/2012 12:07:08 AM 740 Views
Who are you to decide that? - 26/07/2012 12:16:45 AM 904 Views
I'm not the one deciding. - 26/07/2012 12:36:17 AM 741 Views
Essentially you're saying "there are lots of racists in Europe". - 26/07/2012 08:28:26 AM 859 Views
That's an oversimplification. - 29/07/2012 03:13:14 AM 810 Views
You stated it as a fact. - 26/07/2012 07:49:58 PM 798 Views
I think any organisation should have the right to choose who represents them - 25/07/2012 11:20:36 PM 816 Views
Well, but that's not the end of it. - 26/07/2012 12:12:09 AM 878 Views
It is for me - 26/07/2012 12:26:25 AM 789 Views
So...conformity ahead? *NM* - 26/07/2012 12:40:03 AM 385 Views
Is that all that happened? - 25/07/2012 11:28:17 PM 757 Views
That and some pro-Golden Dawn statements. - 26/07/2012 12:14:25 AM 942 Views
For me it is more than enough - 26/07/2012 12:32:35 AM 727 Views
It's not what happened to her that I typically waver on. - 27/07/2012 03:08:45 PM 765 Views
It's not a matter of freedom of expression - 26/07/2012 09:49:59 PM 952 Views
This. *NM* - 26/07/2012 10:26:37 PM 405 Views
I oppose censorship even if it is not comng from the government - 26/07/2012 10:16:30 PM 785 Views
How is it censorship? - 27/07/2012 02:33:30 AM 889 Views
try looking up the word censorship and ask yourself would their actions supress speech - 27/07/2012 02:59:11 AM 1017 Views
I know the definition thank you. How exactly was her communication suppressed? - 27/07/2012 05:54:39 PM 912 Views
you are right public punishment of political expression could never been seen as suppression - 27/07/2012 06:20:15 PM 1034 Views
Well - 27/07/2012 07:20:27 PM 791 Views
Where did she ever imply she wanted them to be bitten? *NM* - 27/07/2012 08:03:05 PM 463 Views
Hello earth.... "food from home". - 27/07/2012 08:26:15 PM 766 Views
OK I repeat my question: Where did she she WANTED them to be bit? - 30/07/2012 09:07:01 PM 1083 Views
Um, she referred to them as food? - 27/07/2012 08:38:22 PM 822 Views
No what is silly is inferring that she hoped they would be bitten *NM* - 30/07/2012 09:09:18 PM 520 Views
No what is silly is inferring that she hoped they would be bitten *NM* - 30/07/2012 09:09:27 PM 428 Views
I'm with you on this - I don't think she wanted them to be bitten. - 27/07/2012 09:02:05 PM 842 Views
It was insensitive at best - 30/07/2012 09:25:06 PM 1300 Views
One problem. - 27/07/2012 04:54:52 AM 792 Views
Exactly - 27/07/2012 12:05:14 PM 801 Views
where do you people get these backasswards idea of what censorship is? PCmart? - 27/07/2012 02:01:29 PM 859 Views
We can have this conversation w/o you being mean. - 27/07/2012 02:57:02 PM 805 Views
I never claimed I was against repercussions and people here are denying it is censorship - 27/07/2012 04:18:54 PM 909 Views
Re: I never claimed I was against repercussions and people here are denying it is censorship - 27/07/2012 05:01:37 PM 819 Views
OK did I miss read what you said? - 27/07/2012 06:41:51 PM 958 Views
No, but the disagreement is important. - 27/07/2012 07:09:11 PM 800 Views
Re: I never claimed I was against repercussions and people here are denying it is censorship - 27/07/2012 06:23:17 PM 741 Views
sorry I forgot the Olympic spirit was about banning athletes for dumb jokes they apologized for - 27/07/2012 08:30:08 PM 730 Views
You're really not going to make sense of this if you keep mashing everything together. - 27/07/2012 08:59:35 PM 761 Views
I know you said it but do you actually believe it? - 27/07/2012 01:56:35 PM 771 Views
It's a good question, but yes, I do. - 27/07/2012 02:42:28 PM 824 Views
Are going to ban everyone and everyone country who says something about anyone else? - 27/07/2012 04:47:51 PM 738 Views
Yes, that is clearly exactly what I said. - 27/07/2012 05:10:37 PM 780 Views
i have a feeling you are being influenced by that pic they run with all the articles about her? - 27/07/2012 02:14:13 PM 791 Views
Surely you don't think... - 27/07/2012 02:57:47 PM 706 Views
Heh. - 27/07/2012 05:53:07 PM 947 Views
Typo? There are limits to our credulity... or to mine, anyway. - 27/07/2012 06:27:44 PM 790 Views
Looks like Voula Papachristou agrees with Tom - 27/07/2012 07:09:30 PM 818 Views
Quite understandable. But so's the Greek OC's decision. - 27/07/2012 07:11:31 PM 830 Views
And now a Swiss footabller has gone as well - 30/07/2012 08:22:45 PM 837 Views
That's just poor sportsmanship. *NM* - 30/07/2012 08:53:53 PM 526 Views
And an Australian athlete has been sent home now - 04/08/2012 10:12:12 AM 660 Views

Reply to Message